Guest Post: David Salisbury says Vocabulary is a Privilege

Last updated on: May 27, 2011 at 10:16 am by Guest Contributor

Guest Post: David Salisbury says Vocabulary is a Privilege 2011-05-27T10:16:16-04:00 Guest Contributor

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Find other posts related to this topic on the link round-up post!

Vocabulary is a privilege. Because those in the Pagan sphere have such diversified sets of language, we get the privilege of using language that suits our needs and the needs of our work when we need to. There aren’t many faith traditions that get to interchange the language they used to describe themselves. In fact, the Christian clergy I know often lament the lack of freedom they have in describing their faith denominations. This is often mandated by their overarching church.

Since Pagans, Polytheists, etc don’t have a centralized governing body, its no surprise that schism around descriptive language is increasing. This doesn’t have to be a bag thing of course. In referring to the story of Drew Jacobs of Temple of the River, its clear to see that evaluating his faith description has helped his organization gain a new substance and sense of growth that would have probably come much closer otherwise. Perhaps breaking away from umbrella terms is good for us? It could very well be one of those instances of “growing up” that our communities do throughout the years.

Still, umbrella terms like Paganism remain a privilege that I use so often in my work. In my interfaith work, it is often more reasonable to describe myself as Pagan rather than a “nondual Goddess-centric polytheist”. If I did that, my entire conversation would be wrapped up in trying to explain what that mains to me and why I chose to use that term to describe myself. Rather, when I say I’m Pagan I normally get an “oh ok” and then we can move on into whatever interfaith work we’re engaging in. Some may call this bartering with the integrity of language. I call it building bridges for work I consider more important than etymology and theological classification.

I can foresee a time when many of us will choose to not identify with the word “Pagan” in favor of something more custom-fit to the practitioner. I believe this will form slowly as our numbers grow. If “Paganism” is indeed on an upward swing still, then it will be interesting to see how we sort ourselves out.

Until then, I will remain with myself as a “nondual Goddess-centric polytheist”. To the world, I will remain a Pagan.

Previous Post

May 26, 2011

Does "Paganism" Bring You Down? - UPDATED

Next Post

May 27, 2011 Guest Post: Marcel says Polytheist has fewer Preconceived Notions

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category alexandrian asatru astrology ATW Audio books btw ceremonial magick chaos classics community conversion cosmology dianic discordian druid dvd eclectic equinox ethics family feri festivals film Fully Inclusive Events gardnerian gender issues glbt heathen hellenismos history humor initiation interfaith magick meditation Military movies music mysticism myth networking news Open Thread Pagan Pagan 101 Paganism passings polytheism Polytheistic Religion polytheology praxis Reading List religio romana review ritual sabbats santeria service solstice symbols tools values wicca witchcraft

Select a Month July 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does "Pentecost" mean?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Twelfth Twentieth First Fiftieth