Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

PANTHEON

Home
Pagan
The Justice of True Grit

The Justice of True Grit

Last updated on: February 27, 2011 at 5:02 pm by Kathy Nance

The Justice of True Grit 2011-02-27T17:02:04-04:00 Kathy Nance

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

True Grit is about justice—both human and Divine.

It starts with a call for both Old Testament and American justice on the 1870s frontier. It ends with a neat demonstration of the Law of Return.

The main players in this morality tale are Rooster Cogburn (Jeff Bridges), the lawman who acts as if he is above both kinds of Law. And Mattie Ross (Hailee Steinfeld), the 14-year-old girl who starts by invoking the laws of the United States and ends by enacting not just frontier justice, but the most ancient of retributions. And the Texas Ranger LaBoeuf (Matt Damon), who does the best job of staying true to the laws of the land and his own moral code.

The story is set in Arkansas and the Indian Territory (I assume much of the present-day Oklahoma) in the 1870s. The law and lawyers have arrived, and the young heroine deals confidently with both as the film opens. She arranges to have her father’s remains shipped home, dickers with the undertaker over the embalming fees, and outsmarts a frontier horse trader to get back not only the money her father paid for a string of ponies, but a settlement on the horse his killer stole.

She next goes shopping for a bounty hunter to bring back Tom Chaney (Josh Brolin), the man who killed her father and escaped into Indian Territory. She’s tried the official law—the sheriff—and been told it’s hopeless.

The scene that sets up Cogburn’s character, and usefulness to Mattie, is played for laughs. But it is chilling. As he testifies in court, he lies. He reveals that he’s killed a couple dozen men in the course of his enforcement career, and implies many of the deaths were more a matter of convenience than self-defense. The only thing that separates him from some of the outlaws he pursues is his tin star.

We learn later he rode with Quantrill’s Raiders during the Civil War. Quantrill’s men waged pro-Confederate guerilla warfare on the Missouri-Kansas border. Frank and Jesse James were among its members.

And yet, Mattie the legal scholar, the upright Bible-quoting maid, hires Cogburn. Fifty dollars down, another $50 when he produces Chaney for trial in Arkansas. She will have none of the assistance of LaBoeuf, who’s pursuing Chaney for the reward offered in the state of Texas. Mattie wants a more direct justice. Chaney will hang for her father’s murder. His other crimes mean nothing to her.

Hiring Cogburn is the first act Mattie takes that puts her on the edge of established law. Her decision to ride along instead of following her mother’s request to go home puts her decidedly over it, making her legally a runaway. But she’s chosen to follow the law laid down by her own moral code in seeing that her father is avenged. It’s a Law older than the Bible she quotes, older even than the Old Testament justice of “an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth.”

Perhaps it’s the same law that Cogburn follows, and his U.S. Marshall’s job is just a cover for his meting out what he perceives as justice. His character is certainly complex, and I may be unnecessarily biased by the visceral chill I get in hearing “Quantrill’s Raiders.” They were as sadistic a band as rode in the 19th century. I can’t help but contrast that with the discipline enforced on the Army of Northern Virginia, of which LaBoeuf is a veteran, and wonder if his respect for the law of the land was in part formed by it.

As the film unfolds, we see Cogburn and Mattie forming a bond. We see him use his skills to track Chaney, save Mattie’s and LaBoeuf’s lives, and his own. And yet . . . right after his famous charge against four armed assailants, he loses his beautiful and valuable horse. Losing a horse was a powerful blow both symbolically and literally in the Old West. A horse was transportation and a friend. It could be the difference between life and death—probably why the traditional frontier penalty for stealing someone’s horse was death.

As Cogburn lies pinned beneath his crippled mount, LaBoeuf takes a long and skillful shot that kills the last bandit and saves Cogburn. Within seconds of screen time, he’s knocked savagely on the head by Chaney, who threatens Mattie.

Mattie picks up LaBoeuf’s rifle and shoots Chaney dead. Cold triumph, bloody jubilation, burn cold in her eyes. And within a few seconds of screen time, she’s tumbled backwards into a pit. Before she can be rescued, she turns back into a frightened child and is bitten by a rattler.

Cogburn races to a frontier doctor with her. He rides her little Mustang so ruthlessly it drops from exhaustion. He runs with Mattie in his arms until he is almost at that point himself.

We hear in the voice-over that ends the film that he stayed until she was out of danger, then vanished with LaBoeuf, presumably to collect the Texas reward on Chaney. She loses her arm to the effects of the snakebite.

With Newtonian precision, Mattie’s acts have rebounded. She loses her surrogate father, her arm, her horse, her innocence. And yet, if she’d stuck to her original intent to bring Chaney back for the courts to deal with, she might have been killed. Trying to parse the justice and injustice of that scene is difficult. But so is sticking to our principles.

LaBoeuf did the best job of that—and lost the least. Was that fair? Maybe so, maybe not. I suppose it depends on how we define “fair.” Justice holds scales in one hand, a sword in the other. Both have their uses. The best we can do is weigh our actions carefully and try to stay within the Law.

Previous Post

February 27, 2011

Know Thyself: The King's Speech

Next Post

February 28, 2011 Guest Post: Lamyka on The Androgynous Divine

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category alexandrian asatru astrology ATW Audio books btw ceremonial magick chaos classics community conversion cosmology dianic discordian druid dvd eclectic equinox ethics family feri festivals film Fully Inclusive Events gardnerian gender issues glbt heathen hellenismos history humor initiation interfaith magick meditation Military movies music mysticism myth networking news Open Thread Pagan Pagan 101 Paganism passings polytheism Polytheistic Religion polytheology praxis Reading List religio romana review ritual sabbats santeria service solstice symbols tools values wicca witchcraft

Select a Month July 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who is the most common author of the Psalms?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Solomon Asaph David Moses