Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Orthodixie

Home
Eastern Orthodox
REVIEW: The Person of the Christ

REVIEW: The Person of the Christ

Last updated on: October 20, 2008 at 5:29 pm by Fr. Joseph Huneycutt

REVIEW: The Person of the Christ 2008-10-20T17:29:00-05:00 Fr. Joseph Huneycutt

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The Person of the Christ:
The Early Context of the Savior
by Daniel Fanous

When putting together a large and complex puzzle, one must begin by defining the margins. It’s often tempting to lump together whole sections that obviously fit, yet without being moored by foundational definitions these portions may often be set aside and forgotten. In the end, lacking time and zeal, a puzzle that remains unfinished is, without a doubt, even more puzzling. For many, the Old Testament’s relation to, and revelation of, the Christ may be just as daunting. As with a difficult puzzle, it helps to have a friend.

Enter a beautiful puzzle titled The Person of the Christ: The Early Context of the Savior, a book which the author, Dan Fanous, dedicates:

To my friend

Who is this friend, you may ask. No puzzle here, dear reader, the answer is clear: it is you. You are invited to meet this Person within his own culture, his own place and time.

“If there is a Truth, if Truth is absolute, then humanity knows no purpose except to know that Truth. Men have sought this Truth from the beginning of time, some have found it, most have not. Yet, it remains the one thing needful, the sole underlying reality of our lives. To know this Truth, and not self-conceived notions of truth, we must turn our minds, hearts, and eyes to a time in which the Truth was revealed” (p.1).

“Some two thousand years ago, a Man lived and died. A Man most blessed, a Man most glorious. Mysterious, He shall be called, known only as the One. The One lived among a chosen people, the elect” (p.1).

“If the One is of the ‘chosen people,’ if His life is theirs, then it is only through His people that we may dare to approach His mystery. It is through their customs, their hopes, their lives that we may come to know the One. We shall see that they are our people, and their hopes are ours” (p.3).

In setting out on this journey, Fanous encourages us to put away all preconceived notions so as to meet the Man, the One, within His own context, saying: “It is not my purpose to give you an exhaustive history for I am no historian, but rather I endeavor to provide for you an accurate story in which a world is shaped” (p.7).

Thus, beginning with Abraham, we work our way forward through an earthly kingdom, the split of a kingdom into North and South, and the messianic expectations found within an exploration of the Davidic line.

Delving into daunting but fundamental subjects such as the Shekhinah of God and messianic attributes of prophet, priest, and king, Fanous keeps the historical details flowing, making sure to remind us of where we have been lest we get lost and lack direction, not knowing where we are going. Readers, from Old Testament scholars to those ill-versed in history, will appreciate his simplifying and collating the facts leading up to the advent of the Messiah.

Key to the value of this book is the filling in of the puzzle pieces concerning words and concepts often mentioned in Scripture, yet which many readers fail to comprehend. For instance, concerning Samaria and the Samaritans, Fanous gives a concise and helpful history of their differences with the “chosen people” going back to the division of the kingdom, which eventually result in definite distinctions between the “holy” and the “unholy,” Jews and Samaritans (p.28).

Then there’s all those glossed over sections of canonical Scripture (deemed boring by the likes of Martin Luther), such as Maccabees. These are covered with ease by Fanous; they combine to form a section of the puzzle that, lacking proper placement, would distort the whole, leaving it incomplete.

One of the most helpful features of The Person of the Christ is the connection of pieces concerning the Saducees, and the Pharisees. No matter how full your current understanding of these groups, Fanous’s assembly is complete, perceptive and clear. Rather than linger, however, the author does this in a manner that keeps leading, over and over again, to the One.

“Let not our hearts’ be weary, for this is one and the same journey to the One. For the One meditated on Torah, the One lived Torah, the One was Torah. How shall we proceed, how is it that we are to understand this Law, and by necessity those who expound this Law? For I propose that there is a mystical dimension to Torah, a dimension that is forbidden to us, forbidden till the very moment we understand it in the light of the One” (p.69).

First, the Sadducees —

“It was not a simple matter of the scribes dividing into two schools: one of the Sadducees who were an exclusive priestly aristocracy, and the other of the Pharisees who are lay constituent interpreters of Torah” (p.71).

Key to understanding this distinction is a quote by Jacob Neusner:

“The Pharisees claimed that Scripture and the traditionally oral interpretation were one. To the Sadducees such a claim of unity was spurious and masked innovation” (p.73).

Fanous then goes on to tell of how the Pharisees may have become a distinct faction during the period of the Maccabees “in a response to the laxity towards Torah by the secularized high priests who were the political leaders of the nation” (p.78).

Thus it is that:

“… the fundamental distinction of their teachings, not of sola Torah as the Sadducees, but rather the ‘tradition of the elders,’ a discerning of the spirit in the ‘letter of the Law,’ so that it may be applied in each and every action of life” (p.81).

[Notice the parallels with Patristic Tradition.]

Not only did the Pharisees believe, unlike the Sadducees, in the resurrection of body and soul, they also held that those who did good would live again and those who’d done evil would be “detained in an everlasting prison.” Fanous points out that this understanding is due to their emphasis on the entirety of the Scripture and the “tradition of the elders” (p.82).

Thus, it would seem clear; the teachings of the One were compatible with the teachings of the Pharisees. Furthermore, being invited to the home of a Pharisee — on a Sabbath, no less (Luke 14) — indicated friendly terms. Fanous goes one step further, indicating that they may have first shared Sabbath worship together (p.85):

“This is not surprising, for the teachings of the Pharisees were not at odds with the fundamental teachings of the One” (p.86).

For me, one of the more fascinating revelations in this book concerns the Sanhedrin. From the outset of Chapter 4, one can see much more than a mere piece of the puzzle. When it is explained that the Sanhedrin was a group of seventy plus a leader, “an assembly for the direction of the people, so that the people may come to know the God that was known by their fathers” (p.99), it is difficult not to let the mind stray ahead to the ordering and sending of The Seventy in the New Testament (Luke 10). Fanous explains that, regardless of when the word Sanhedrin came into use, or what it means, “… the result is the designation for a group of men who were chosen to lead the people to ultimately know the God of Abraham …” (p.100).

Shadows of the Church fall greater still on passages such as this one:

“The Sanhedrin then becomes an assembly of elders … which in the early first century A.D., was primarily of two parties, the Sadducees and the Pharisees, the former of which ruled through the authority of the high priest. However, as to how or for how long a member was to remain in the Sanhedrin, we are unsure. All that is known is that to be a member one must be ‘holy,’ a legitimate Israelite, and that the process of admission involved the laying on of hands” (p.102).

Now, on to the One —

“The One can not simply be known, rather we must ascend in order to know Him, and He must descend. This path we do not tread alone, for many have come before us, each partaking as far as they were able. Each ascending to the Presence of God, so that they might know Him. For to know Him is not a matter of searching and studying texts, but rather seeking the One who lies within the text. It is only through this encounter with the One within the texts that we will know Him” (p.111).

From here, Fanous proceeds to the holy name, the Tetragrammaton (YHWH) —

“How is it then that we may come to know this God of the fathers? For the ancients to know a being, one was required to have knowledge of its name. A being, be it an object or a subject, a thing or a person, could not be known entirely till its name was known. We shall meet with this matter later, but for now suffice to say that knowledge of a name is the entrance into the knowledge of that which is indicated by the name. From this we see that God could not be known, till His Name was known. What then is His Name?” (p.114).

Fanous leads us, following Moses, to the Presence of God, the Shekhinah, in the burning bush, and the revelation of the ‘I Am who I Am’ … (p.115).

And yet, it is not that simple, there are more pieces to this part of the puzzle and the author both cautions and encourages us:

“As we tread the path of revelation, the movement that was ordained by God in the scriptures, we must digress for only a short time to explore the matter of the method. Bear with me, for this method is invaluable in tracing the revelation of God through the scriptures …” (p.116).

“We are led in this movement of revelation to the One, for it is the One who shall reveal to us, in fullness, He Who Is. For only by the Infinite may we perceive the Infinite, for through His ‘Light we see Light’” (p.137).

“How is it that I said that we may only see the Light of the Infinite through the Light of the One? Have we not spoken of the One as a man? If the One is a mere man, then how can the finite reveal the Infinite? We speak words of great trepidation and awe. For our words no longer echo logic, for that which is Divine must be reconciled with that which is human. The Infinite must dwell among that which is finite. I speak of the Shekhinah. Let us hurry, for the time of the mystery is near” (p.137).

I shall not unveil all of the author’s words in this revelatory section; yet, a selection of puzzle pieces is provided here:

“Whether an intermediary or the objective essence of God, there is consensus within rabbinic literature that the Shekhinah descends to dwell among men: imparting Divinity to humanity. This descent, whether it be as a unique identity or not, finds movement within God, that is, it is the full Divinity that is acting. According to the Talmudic writings, the Shekhinah descends to the Garden of Eden, it descends to prevent the building of the tower of Babel, to judge Sodom and Egypt, to part the Red Sea. The Shekhinah descends upon Mount Sinai to reveal the glory of God, it is the presence within the pillar of cloud of fire; it dwells in the sanctuary, and in the Ark of the Covenant. Subsequently, men are not left alone, but rather being the ‘chosen people,’ God dwells among them in His Shekhinah. God thus is near to His people” (p.141).

I must say no more about this, lest I prematurely solve the puzzle before you, other than to say that the place of the Shekhinah in relation to the One is both obvious and surprising.

From there, Fanous moves to the final section of the book on the Messiah: “To the majority of the modern followers of the One, the [Messiah] is a simple being, He was expected, He came, He conquered” (p.149).

But, Fanous cautions —

“The [Messiah] must be understood backwards, but He must be lived forwards. To understand the [Messiah], we must look at the development of the messianic concept, thus we must seek out its root and follow its development, for in this development lies the knowledge that dictates our faith in the future messianic age. To meet the One, we must understand this past that forever indicates the future” (p.153).

Therein, in a nutshell, is the reason for this wonderful exposition, The Person of the Christ, written by Dan Fanous for his friend. To tell more would be as unbecoming as a man merely recounting his own puzzle assembly; for the beauty of a puzzle is personal. Also, this is not a puzzle that a friend finishes and proudly frames, displaying for all to see. Rather, friends of the One will want to pull this one down again and again to disassemble, digest, and reassemble. I believe, if I may, you’ll also want to share The Person of the Christ with your friends.

The Person of the Christ is available — HERE.

More – here.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

October 20, 2008

Ecumenical Patriarch Speaks at the Vatican

Next Post

October 22, 2008 Lessons from a Turkish market

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month November 2016 October 2016 August 2016 May 2016 April 2016 January 2016 September 2015 August 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does the Red Horse in Revelations symbolize?

Select your answer to see how you score.

War Death Famine Deception