Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Orthodixie

Home
Eastern Orthodox
The Massacre of Innocents

The Massacre of Innocents

Last updated on: September 8, 2004 at 12:04 pm by Fr. Joseph Huneycutt

The Massacre of Innocents 2004-09-08T12:04:00-05:00 Fr. Joseph Huneycutt

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

September 4, 2004 — THE mass murder of children

revolts the human psyche. Herod sending his henchmen

to massacre the infants of Bethlehem haunts the

Gospels. Nothing in our time was crueler than what

the Germans did to children during the Holocaust.

Slaughtering the innocents violates a universal

human taboo. Or a nearly universal one. Those

Muslims who preach Jihad against the West decided

years ago that killing Jewish or Christian children

is not only acceptable, but pleasing to their god

when done by “martyrs.”

It isn’t politically correct to say this, of course.

We’re supposed to pretend that Islam is a “religion

of peace.” All right, then: It’s time for Muslims to

stand up for the once-noble, nearly lost traditions

of their faith and condemn what Arab and Chechen

terrorists and blasphemers did in the Russian town

of Beslan.

If Muslim religious leaders around the world will

not publicly condemn the taking of children as

hostages and their subsequent slaughter — if those

“men of faith” will not issue a condemnation without

reservations or caveats — then no one need pretend

any longer that all religions are equally sound and

moral.

Islam has been a great and humane faith in the past.

Now far too many of its adherents condone, actively

or passively, the mass murder of school kids.

Instead of condemnations of the Muslim “Jihadis”

responsible for butchering more than 200 women and

children in cold blood, we will hear spiteful

counter-accusations about imaginary atrocities

supposedly committed by Western militaries.

Well, the cold fact is that Western soldiers,

whether Americans, Brits, Russians or Israelis, do

not take hundreds of children hostage, then shoot

them in cold blood while detonating bombs in their

midst. The Muslim world can lie to itself, but we

need lie no longer.

The tragedy in southern Russia occurred thousands of

miles from the United States, but, in essence, that

massacre happened next door. The parents, teachers

and students kept for days without water or food in

a sweltering school building before being butchered

were our children, our sisters, our wives, our

parents.

The mass hostage situation wasn’t about Chechen

rebels (and at least 10 Arabs) opposing the Russian

government. It was a continuation of the universal

struggle between good and evil. And there is no

doubt which side is evil, scorned though the word

may be by our own elite.

How can any human being with a shred of conscience

dismiss what occurred in that school as anything

less than evil?

The attack in Beslan wasn’t about Russia’s brutal

incompetence in Chechnya — as counter-productive as

Moscow’s grim heavy-handedness may have been. It was

about religious bigotry so profound that the

believer can hold a gun to a child’s head, pull the

trigger and term the act “divine justice.”

We will hear complaints that the Russian special

forces should have waited — even after the

terrorists began shooting children. Negotiations are

the heroin of Westerners addicted to self-delusion.

Who among us would have waited when he or she saw

fleeing children cut down by automatic weapons? The

urge to protect children is as primal as any impulse

we ever feel.

Make no mistake: No blame attaches to the Russians

for the massacre at that school. The guilt is

entirely upon the Islamic extremists who have led

the religion they claim to cherish into the realms

of nightmare.

There will be repercussions. Having suffered the

hijacking and destruction of two passenger jets, a

deadly bombing at a Moscow subway station and a

massacre in a primary school all in less than two

weeks, the Kremlin will have learned to rue the day

it imagined that there was anything to gain by

opposing American efforts against terrorists,

whether Osama bin Laden or Saddam Hussein.

As they inevitably do, the terrorists reminded the

world of their heartless barbarism. Even if France

manages to beg the release of its kidnapped

journalists in Iraq, it has begun to sense its

vulnerability. And all Europeans with a vestige of

sense will recognize that the school seizure in

Russia could easily repeat itself in Languedoc or

Umbria, Bavaria or Kent.

An attack on children is an attack on all of

humanity.

No matter what differences Western states discover

to divide them, the terrorists will bring us

together in the end. Their atrocities expose all

wishful thinking for what it is.

A final thought: Did any of those protesters who

came to Manhattan to denounce our liberation of 50

million Muslims stay an extra day to protest the

massacre in Russia? Of course not.

The protesters no more care for dead Russian

children than they care for dead Kurds or for the

hundreds of thousands of Arabs that Saddam Hussein

executed. Or for the ongoing Arab-Muslim slaughter

of blacks in Sudan. Nothing’s a crime to those

protesters unless the deed was committed by America.

The butchery in Russia was a crime against humanity.

In every respect. Was any war ever more necessary or

just than the War on Terror?

And what will terror’s apologists say when the

killers come for their own children?

From a NY Times Article

BY RALPH PETERS

Ralph Peters is the author of “Beyond Terror:

Strategy in a Changing World.”

Uncategorized

Previous Post

September 7, 2004

Help

Next Post

September 9, 2004 Help for Russia

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month November 2016 October 2016 August 2016 May 2016 April 2016 January 2016 September 2015 August 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which book in the New Testament is the shortest?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Philemon 2 John 3 John Jude