Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Open Table Judaism

Wisdom & Story

Last updated on: March 18, 2016 at 12:23 pm   by Gregory Eran Gronbacher

Wisdom & Story 2016-03-18T12:23:21-04:00 Gregory Eran Gronbacher

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

By Gregory

Wisdom

People receive and shape their worldview in relationship to others, in community, and in a given culture.

Culture is the outgrowth of humanity’s social nature and is the totality of customs, practices, values, and communal structures that shape a people’s daily life. Culture’s function, in the general sense, is to promote wisdom – knowledge of how to live a full life. Religion tends to be the promoter/keeper of most forms of higher wisdom in any given culture and religion relies on myth to achieve this task.

The human person is a story-telling, metaphor-loving, symbol-making being for whom myth encapsulates information regarding primal, existential meaning. The human person relates on a psychological-spiritual level to stories, narratives, icons, and parables. Therefore, the language of spirituality is that of myth, metaphor, and symbol. All myths are about the transformation of consciousness. A myth speaks to something profound and true about our humanity; it shows us how to live more richly, more humanely, and intensely.

An example of how myth shapes culture can be seen at the height of the Roman Empire. To think as a Roman was by definition to filter the world through a mythical narrative that described how original chaos was brought to order, peace and prosperity under the paternal rule of a benevolent set of Divinities. Roman religion applied that narrative to the cosmos; Roman philosophy applied it to the relation between mind and body, and so on. Roman Legions applied it to the Western world. The difficulty, of course, came when the world started throwing things at the Roman world that couldn’t be made to fit the narrative.

Religions that developed in the ancient world naturally contain mythic accounts as part of their historical-moral story-telling. Ancient peoples were not literal thinkers as are we moderns. Post-enlightenment society shifted toward a more literal, factual means of writing and telling history. The ancients mingled story-telling with their history, recording accounts often in supernatural, fictional, and metaphorical-symbolic terms.

IMPORTANT NOTE – to claim a story as myth does not mean the story isn’t true. Myth in its proper sense means something akin to meta-story – a grand narrative that provides orientation, a sense of place, even an identity. To argue, for example, that the accounts of Jesus’ resurrection are mythic is not to comment on whether they actually happened – rather, it’s to argue that these are pivotal, core accounts that likely have many layers of meaning and symbolism.

Another example – the ancient Jews created and promoted the Exodus myth. The central meaning of the story is the formation of the Hebrew tribes into a unified, liberated people now free to create its own culture. This core narrative of meaning is embedded in a story that includes slavery in Egypt, plagues, and the parting of the Red (or Reed) Sea. The fact that the historical, scientific, linguistic, and archeological record doesn’t support these facts is beside the point – the emergence of a free people is the core truth contained within the highly symbolic story.

Amythia

Western culture has been animated by the Judeo-Christian myths – rooted in a personal-creator God. Over the past 200 years, these myths have substantially eroded due to repeated damage at the hands of various forms of human knowledge.

Increasing numbers of educated Westerners are unwilling to engage in the exhausting mental gymnastics necessary to maintain the Judeo-Christian vision. The reality of the random suffering of innocent people throughout the world stands in contradiction to the assertion of a loving, intervening Deity. Additionally, the cosmological elements of the myth have been undermined by the advances of modern science, and the moral vision of the myth undermined by evolving understandings of human nature, human sexuality, and psychology.

The Western Judeo-Christian worldview has fragmented for a variety of reasons. Many in the West now operate from a worldview that cannot accept the literal truth of the Lazarus account – as well as other core insights of Judeo-Christianity.

The unraveling of the dominant mythos of Western culture means that we are now unhinged from our centuries-old sources/filters of meaning. Western culture is experiencing amythia – the lack of a unified, living myth that is shared by enough individuals to hold sway over the culture and serve as a foundation for a shared cosmology and morality. Contemporary Western culture is now characterized by an increasing anarchy of meanings – and sometimes no meaning at all. All this undermines the ability to achieve a unified vision of meaning and thus a sense of a common good.

Moving Forward

There are no simple antidotes to our current crisis of amythia. Any solutions are difficult to apply and will take decades to deploy and measure for efficacy. We can no longer be religious in the same way as our ancestors. The world has been irrevocably transformed and so have our patterns of thought – by science, development, and human experience itself. We will inevitably think of the world in which we live, and our human place within it, in terms quite different from those presented by previous renditions of the Western religious traditions.

It seems to me that there are at least three basic approaches our culture can take to Judeo-Christianity and its myths.

First, we can simply reject them and embrace atheism, or some other non-Abrahamic religious-mythic outlook. Polls and surveys show that growing numbers of people are doing just this. The rise of New Atheism, the popularity of Eastern philosophies and nature-based spirituality, and the growing numbers of people claiming no religious affiliation is the result of opting for this path.

Second, we can accept the basic Judeo-Christian worldview and find ways to address the cognitive dissonance that seems to arise between its traditional vision and the emerging, more naturalist one of science and modernity. Adopting this approach means accepting that the Lazarus story is likely true, and that it can happen again. It means living with the tensions of sometimes conflicting truth claims from theology, science, history, and even human experience.

Third, we can try to find ways of engaging iron-aged myths with updated thinking, while realizing the need to reinterpret the traditional understanding of Judeo-Christianity. This approach would require the ability to recognize myth for what it is, move beyond the literal concerns, and then, with updated knowledge, engage the myth allowing it to inform and engage us. Adopting this approach means accepting the challenge of arduous reinterpretation that shifts the Judeo-Christian vision in credible directions, but without causing irreparable harm to the entire edifice during the move.

Which approach appeals to you and why?

Uncategorized

Previous Post



March 18, 2016

Nature & Spirituality

Next Post



March 18, 2016 A Prayer of Interconnectedness


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Bible Biblical Interpretation Change Christianity Culture Emerging Judaism God Innovation Jewish Moral Theology Jewish Observance Jewish Practice Jewish sexual ethics Jewish Social Justice Jewish Spirituality Jewish Theology Judaism Orthodoxy Rabbinic Judaism Reform Judaism Reform Observance Scripture Theological Change Theology of God Torah Uncategorized

Select a Month November 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

I rebuilt the walls in just 52 days despite opposition from Sanballat and Tobiah. Who am I?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Nehemiah Joshua Zerubbabel Ezra

Related posts from Open Table Judaism

Jewish

The Gift of Light in the Year of...

Open Table Judaism

Jewish

Quiet Turmoil

Open Table Judaism

Jewish

The Sanctuary of Home

Open Table Judaism

Jewish

Out in the Wilderness

Open Table Judaism

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Jewish

Building a Little Ark in a Frightening World

This past Shabbat, we read about Noah. I love this story. The...

Yom Kippur : Is There Always Room for...

Making Room for Forgiveness  Every year as Yom Kippur approaches, I find...

This Rosh Hashanah: Can I Find New Meaning?

A Sunrise, a New Year, and a Question On our way to...

Killing Amalek: The Torah’s Most Misunderstood Commandment

Few passages of the Torah have provoked more confusion, polemic, and misuse...

The Art of Beginning Again

  I have never trusted a first draft. I don’t mean that...

Back to School, Back to Reality—and a New...

A New School Year Begins… Back to Reality A new school year...

view all Jewish blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube