Only Half the Matter

Last updated on: March 18, 2016 at 1:04 pm by Gregory Eran Gronbacher

Only Half the Matter 2016-03-18T13:04:03-04:00 Gregory Eran Gronbacher

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

By Gregory

Many of us have read the work of the New Atheists or encountered those influenced by them. I’d imagine many of us have replied to their assertions with a phrase similar to, “I don’t believe in that sort of God either.” The phrase indicating that we don’t ascribe to the immature, unrealistic visions of Divinity that the New Atheists usually attack. Admittedly, such gods are soft targets.

Yet that phrase represents only half the matter – only half the conversation. What needs to follow is the earnest dialog concerning what kind of God do you affirm?

Such is hard work.

In my previous post I outlined why I can’t accept visions of a Divine Santa-God. By this, I mean almost juvenile concepts of God that feature God as best friend, personal attendant, wish-granter, and projection of ego and personal judgment in the world. The God who talks to you each morning and strokes your ego, fuels your OCD, and helps you control others. Such a Divinity more closely resembles Santa-Claus than the God of the scriptures, and even more importantly, the God of reality.

Saying one doesn’t believe in such a saccharine deity is only half the matter – the other half is beginning the work of elucidating the sort of Divinity you do affirm.

What is your God like? How realistic is such a vision? Can such a God bring about transformation? Is such a God worthy of worship? Where does such a God come from? How do you know your vision has any merit?

Humility is a fundamental theological virtue. None of us has seen God. We don’t have pure, unmitigated experiences of the Divine. When we speak about God, we are always speculating, conjecturing, even posturing.

Our ideas of God come from our parents, our religious communities, our culture, our educational experiences, our reading, and our own life experiences. Our experience and thinking of God is always mediated through these things.

I want a God that makes sense and doesn’t require constant mental gymnastics.

I don’t want to have to make excuses for God. I don’t want to have to appeal to “how he works in mysterious ways (which is bullshit wrapped in wishful thinking). I don’t want to be left wondering why God seemingly let us down, didn’t show up, or allowed something to happen that I wouldn’t let occur to my worst enemies.

I want a God that aligns with a full view of scripture. I want a God that doesn’t conflict with science or our better judgments about reality.

I want a God that isn’t pie-in-the-sky, bat shit crazy, juvenile projections of namby-pamby soft-self – you get the idea.

I want a God who is still standing after considerations of the Holocaust, cancer in five year olds, miscarriages, disappointments, accidents, earth-quakes, random killings, lay-offs, and broken hearts.

I know that such a God does not reside in the mainstream theology of most Evangelical or even mainstream Protestant or Catholic thought. I don’t usually find such a God in Orthodox Judaism or Eastern Orthodoxy either. Most comfortable Reform Jewish communities don’t promote realistic a deity either. Not at least in the surface theology and typical droll, lifeless, middle-class liturgies that afflict most parishes, congregations, and communities.

I’ve learned that the God I’m after – and who is after me – is closer to the God of Tillich, Armstrong, Heschel, Buber, Hart, Kaplan – it’s certainly not the God of the atheists, or even of most theists – it’s the God of the anatheists, the process theologians, the honest thinkers; those who have wrestled with God and found the typical, traditional expressions and theories wanting.

It’s the God many of us are afraid to encounter – because it means giving up our spiritual childhood.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

March 18, 2016

Awakenings - Standing at Sinai - Part III

Next Post

March 18, 2016 God - A Personal Decision

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Bible Biblical Interpretation Change Christianity Culture Emerging Judaism God Innovation Jewish Moral Theology Jewish Observance Jewish Practice Jewish sexual ethics Jewish Social Justice Jewish Spirituality Jewish Theology Judaism Orthodoxy Rabbinic Judaism Reform Judaism Reform Observance Scripture Theological Change Theology of God Torah Uncategorized

Select a Month November 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

True or False: According to 1 John, God is love, and whoever abides in love abides in God.

Select your answer to see how you score.

TRUE FALSE