Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Open Table Judaism

GOD & MEANING

Last updated on: March 14, 2016 at 7:51 pm   by Gregory Eran Gronbacher

GOD & MEANING 2016-03-14T19:51:15-04:00 Gregory Eran Gronbacher

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

By Gregory

Religion, as the Latin root word implies, is a tying together, a binding – of myths, assertions, values, hopes, and practices – into a more or less coherent tradition that at the end of the day is intended to provide meaning. Meaning refers to a sense of identity, place, and belonging, a foundation from which to begin attempts at answering the “why?” questions in life.

For some religions, but not all (think Buddhism, Taoism, Religious Naturalism, etc.) God is an essential part of the religious equation – a key part. God plays various roles, for some strictly conceptual, for others, conceptual and practical.

Defining God is a slippery task, for the notion of God resists definition. When speaking of the Divine metaphors abound – none of which fully capture or satisfy the fullness of what people are attempting to explain and what many people experience under the category of God.

For some, God is a person, a friend, and a father/mother. Many who claim God as person understand God as a living, relational, vibrant, reality that they feel in personal relationship with. Others tend toward less intimate notions of the Divine – God as force, or power, or ground of being, or ultimate principle, and so on. For many of these individuals, God is a concept that plays a role in their thinking and experiencing of the world, but for whom Divine personal identity is elusive.

God has suffered a bit of a set-back over the past two hundred or so years. There are growing numbers of people for whom God no longer makes sense, for whom God no longer plays a role in a worldview that provides meaning. For atheists, agnostics, and those just no longer interested, God has retreated to the background of their thinking and experience, or has been expunged altogether.

In my opinion, there are good reasons for this retreat. Our individual and collective notions of God are rarely, if ever, static. Various ages have entertained different understandings of Divinity. God for the ninth century BCE Jew, is likely vastly different than God for the second century BCE Greek, which is likely vastly different for the eleventh century CE European Christian, which is likely vastly different for a Christian living in the United States today.

I would argue that God is irrelevant and meaningless for many people today, because our common ideas about God have grown irrelevant and meaningless. (More on this, in future posts.)

On a practical level, given that God is inherently connected to notions of meaning, there is also an inherently personal dimension to the role God plays in a person’s life and thinking. I can’t claim to experience God the same way as you do. Nor can I claim to think exactly the same about the Divine as others do. God, to be meaningful, must be personalized. And this personalization is healthy and necessary. Of course, personalization always runs the risk of idolatry, but without personalization, God remains just a distant concept, and an ambiguous one at that.

An important fact to consider is this – I cannot explain the meaning of someone’s experiences and life to them – only they can do that for themselves. Yes, I can aid by asking probing questions, helping sift through possible scenarios of meaning, but at the end of the day, meaning is personal – only the individual can tell you truthfully what something means to them, for them.

The same is true for God. I can offer my own understanding to aid the understanding of others. I can ask questions, present challenges, and suggest additional approaches. But I cannot define God for another.

And nor should I. And this is the hard part. So many of us have experienced triumphalist, smug, overbearing, tyrannical views on God being shoved down our throats. Further, many of us have experienced God being used a weapon and a justification for other’s attempts to control our thinking and behaving. I cringe any time I hear “God says …” knowing that what likely follows that phrase is ego-projection, manipulation, boundary violation, and self-serving power assertions. Few of us are genuine prophets. And most of us would be far better off not trying to play that role.

There are several ramifications to this truth – one of which is that we should be highly reluctant to interfere with other’s thinking about God. If others want to engage in such conversations, great. If not, then best to mind your own business. And unless another’s views on God is about to lead them to infringe on your personal autonomy or civil liberties, its likely best to simply respect their views unless invited to do otherwise.

We each must discern the meaning of our lives. This is not a solitary task, but ultimately a personal one. The same applies to our thinking about God and the role the Divine plays in the meaning we find in and to our lives. And humility and respect for others means we should tread lightly in such matters.

Uncategorized

Previous Post



March 14, 2016

MORALITY - 100% NATURAL

Next Post



March 14, 2016 RELIGIOUS FUNDAMENTALS


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Bible Biblical Interpretation Change Christianity Culture Emerging Judaism God Innovation Jewish Moral Theology Jewish Observance Jewish Practice Jewish sexual ethics Jewish Social Justice Jewish Spirituality Jewish Theology Judaism Orthodoxy Rabbinic Judaism Reform Judaism Reform Observance Scripture Theological Change Theology of God Torah Uncategorized

Select a Month November 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who were Esther's adversaries in the Persian court?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Sanherib and Nabonidus Haman and his family Sanballat and Tobiah Geshem and Tobiah

Related posts from Open Table Judaism

Jewish

The Gift of Light in the Year of...

Open Table Judaism

Jewish

Quiet Turmoil

Open Table Judaism

Jewish

The Sanctuary of Home

Open Table Judaism

Jewish

Out in the Wilderness

Open Table Judaism

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Jewish

Building a Little Ark in a Frightening World

This past Shabbat, we read about Noah. I love this story. The...

Yom Kippur : Is There Always Room for...

Making Room for Forgiveness  Every year as Yom Kippur approaches, I find...

This Rosh Hashanah: Can I Find New Meaning?

A Sunrise, a New Year, and a Question On our way to...

Killing Amalek: The Torah’s Most Misunderstood Commandment

Few passages of the Torah have provoked more confusion, polemic, and misuse...

The Art of Beginning Again

  I have never trusted a first draft. I don’t mean that...

Back to School, Back to Reality—and a New...

A New School Year Begins… Back to Reality A new school year...

view all Jewish blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube