{"id":1674,"date":"2016-12-29T17:30:28","date_gmt":"2016-12-29T21:30:28","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/admin.patheos.com\/blogs\/oikonomia\/?p=1674"},"modified":"2016-12-29T17:31:52","modified_gmt":"2016-12-29T21:31:52","slug":"politics-character-competition","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/oikonomia\/2016\/12\/politics-character-competition\/","title":{"rendered":"Politics, Character, and Competition"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<\/head>
By Jordan Ballor<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n
The renowned economist F. A. Hayek once observed that \u201cthe curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design.\u201d Many Americans and other observers are waking up today and perhaps, like me, they are thinking that politics has something to teach us about how little we know as well. In fact, economics has something to teach us about what we might get from a political process that is designed in a particular way.<\/p>\n
The two major parties in America nominated candidates who were historically unpopular. But the parties got there in two very different ways. The GOP nominee Donald Trump was an unlikely candidate from the beginning. He faced a deep and varied field in the primary. And against what basically every poll and pundit predicted, Trump won. And won. And won \u2026 until he eventually gained the nomination.<\/p>\n
Hillary Clinton, by contrast, was the presumptive Democratic Party nominee from the start. Bernie Sanders ran an impassioned and vigorous primary challenge against her. But her contest with Sanders was widely thought to be a warm-up, a sparring match, where Clinton could get her campaign going and the winning juices flowing. And just to make sure that the she could be assured the nomination, the Democratic Party had a superdelegate system in place that would mitigate, and even to some extent nullify, the primary voting results.<\/p>\n
Clinton was protected and insulated from the competition of a real primary challenge in a way that Trump was not. As the general election returns were coming in last night, one political commentator described Clinton as \u201cthe Jeb Bush of the Democratic Party.\u201d If the GOP had a superdelegate system in place, the likelihood of a Trump nomination would have been greatly reduced. Perhaps we would have seen a Jeb Bush nomination, or at least some other more establishment candidate.<\/p>\n
By insulating Clinton from an existential primary challenge, the Democratic Party thought they were setting their candidate up for a win in the general election. But what actually happened is that an unpopular and historically weak candidate was protected from real competition, and in a historically nasty general election these flaws were exposed. By opening up a nominating process that had a great deal of diversity and competition, the GOP thought they would find a fitting and thoroughly vetted nominee. What they got was a candidate who the experts thought couldn\u2019t win, until he couldn\u2019t lose.<\/p>\n
There are all kinds of lessons to be learned from what happened and from this exhausting election season. The post-mortems have already begun and will continue for some time. But at least some of those necessary lessons have to do with how little we actually know about the political system we have designed and what it has practically been set up to accomplish.<\/p>\n
\u201cGreat men are almost always bad men,\u201d the British historian Lord Acton claimed. We do not have a political system in America today that fosters healthy competition, moral character, or true statesmen. Instead, we have a system that breeds distrust, envy, and division. From a republic that depended upon the health and vitality of families, churches, and various other forms of association, we have become a polity that encourages \u201cgreat men\u201d to rise up, make us grand promise, and perhaps even worse, attempt to begin to deliver on some of these through political means.<\/p>\n
Somehow America has to find a way forward. Hopefully we can do so with fewer illusions about what we really are able to design and with better ideas about what is actually necessary for a free and virtuous society.<\/p>\n
Originally published at Acton Commentary<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n
Photo credit: ep_jhu<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n<\/body><\/html>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
By Jordan Ballor The renowned economist F. A. Hayek once observed that \u201cthe curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design.\u201d Many Americans and other observers are waking up today and perhaps, like me, they are thinking that politics has something to […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1787,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[66,68],"tags":[1308,1300,1306,1309,1307,969,161,212,1126,234,607,1305],"class_list":["post-1674","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-justice","category-order","tag-assocation","tag-bernie-sanders","tag-clinton","tag-corruption","tag-election","tag-hayek","tag-knowledge","tag-lord-acton","tag-obama","tag-politics","tag-power","tag-trump"],"yoast_head":"\nPolitics, Character, and Competition<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"By Jordan Ballor The renowned economist F. A. Hayek once observed that \u201cthe curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"noindex, follow\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Politics, Character, and Competition\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"By Jordan Ballor The renowned economist F. A. Hayek once observed that \u201cthe curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/oikonomia\/2016\/12\/politics-character-competition\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Oikonomia\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2016-12-29T21:30:28+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-12-29T21:31:52+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"http:\/\/wp.production.patheos.com\/blogs\/oikonomia\/files\/2016\/12\/flags-capitol-politics.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Acton Institute\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Acton Institute\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/oikonomia\/2016\/12\/politics-character-competition\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/oikonomia\/2016\/12\/politics-character-competition\/\",\"name\":\"Politics, Character, and Competition\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/oikonomia\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2016-12-29T21:30:28+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-12-29T21:31:52+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/oikonomia\/#\/schema\/person\/d9303ab53025612363bc63f6dcc02d5f\"},\"description\":\"By Jordan Ballor The renowned economist F. A. Hayek once observed that \u201cthe curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/oikonomia\/2016\/12\/politics-character-competition\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/oikonomia\/2016\/12\/politics-character-competition\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/oikonomia\/2016\/12\/politics-character-competition\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/oikonomia\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Politics, Character, and Competition\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/oikonomia\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/oikonomia\/\",\"name\":\"Oikonomia\",\"description\":\"Resources on Faith, Work, and Economics from the Acton Institute\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/oikonomia\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/oikonomia\/#\/schema\/person\/d9303ab53025612363bc63f6dcc02d5f\",\"name\":\"Acton Institute\",\"description\":\"The Acton Institute for the Study of Religion and Liberty is named after the great English historian, Lord John Acton (1834-1902). Inspired by his work on the relation between liberty and morality, the Acton Institute seeks to articulate a vision of society that is both free and virtuous, the end of which is human flourishing. To that end, the Institute engages in research, publishing, documentary film production, engagement with the media, and organizes seminars aimed at educating religious leaders, business executives, entrepreneurs, university professors, and academic researchers. Acton promotes sound economic thinking and an awareness of the moral underpinnings necessary for a free society.\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/oikonomia\/author\/actoninstitute\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Politics, Character, and Competition","description":"By Jordan Ballor The renowned economist F. A. Hayek once observed that \u201cthe curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know","robots":{"index":"noindex","follow":"follow"},"og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Politics, Character, and Competition","og_description":"By Jordan Ballor The renowned economist F. A. Hayek once observed that \u201cthe curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know","og_url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/oikonomia\/2016\/12\/politics-character-competition\/","og_site_name":"Oikonomia","article_published_time":"2016-12-29T21:30:28+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-12-29T21:31:52+00:00","og_image":[{"url":"http:\/\/wp.production.patheos.com\/blogs\/oikonomia\/files\/2016\/12\/flags-capitol-politics.jpg"}],"author":"Acton Institute","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Acton Institute","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/oikonomia\/2016\/12\/politics-character-competition\/","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/oikonomia\/2016\/12\/politics-character-competition\/","name":"Politics, Character, and Competition","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/oikonomia\/#website"},"datePublished":"2016-12-29T21:30:28+00:00","dateModified":"2016-12-29T21:31:52+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/oikonomia\/#\/schema\/person\/d9303ab53025612363bc63f6dcc02d5f"},"description":"By Jordan Ballor The renowned economist F. A. Hayek once observed that \u201cthe curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/oikonomia\/2016\/12\/politics-character-competition\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/oikonomia\/2016\/12\/politics-character-competition\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/oikonomia\/2016\/12\/politics-character-competition\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/oikonomia\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Politics, Character, and Competition"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/oikonomia\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/oikonomia\/","name":"Oikonomia","description":"Resources on Faith, Work, and Economics from the Acton Institute","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/oikonomia\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/oikonomia\/#\/schema\/person\/d9303ab53025612363bc63f6dcc02d5f","name":"Acton Institute","description":"The Acton Institute for the Study of Religion and Liberty is named after the great English historian, Lord John Acton (1834-1902). Inspired by his work on the relation between liberty and morality, the Acton Institute seeks to articulate a vision of society that is both free and virtuous, the end of which is human flourishing. To that end, the Institute engages in research, publishing, documentary film production, engagement with the media, and organizes seminars aimed at educating religious leaders, business executives, entrepreneurs, university professors, and academic researchers. Acton promotes sound economic thinking and an awareness of the moral underpinnings necessary for a free society.","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/oikonomia\/author\/actoninstitute\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/oikonomia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1674","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/oikonomia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/oikonomia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/oikonomia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1787"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/oikonomia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1674"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/oikonomia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1674\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/oikonomia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1674"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/oikonomia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1674"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/oikonomia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1674"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}