Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Oikonomia

Home
Business, Finance and Religion
What Christians Can Learn from Adam Smith’s ‘Paradox of Value’

What Christians Can Learn from Adam Smith’s ‘Paradox of Value’

Last updated on: November 23, 2016 at 12:26 am by Acton Institute

What Christians Can Learn from Adam Smith’s ‘Paradox of Value’ 2016-11-23T00:26:10-04:00 Acton Institute

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

By Joseph Sunde

In a new video from TED Ed, Akshita Agarwal provides a quick lesson on Adam Smith’s “paradox of value” and the differences between “value in use” and “value in exchange.”

For Christians, there’s a crucial lesson here about the best way to meet human needs in the economic order, whether through trade policy, reducing price controls, or any number of other areas. Discerning “economic value” is a tricky thing, and free economies are a handy tools for working through these things in peaceful and productive ways.

But as Agarwal concludes, it also has implications for our everyday stewardship:

Utility applies not just to buying things, but to all our decisions, and the intuitive way to maximize it and avoid diminishing returns is to vary the way we spend our time and resources. After our basic needs are met, we’d theoretically decide to invest in choices only to the point they’re useful or enjoyable.

Of course, how effectively any of us manage to maximize utility in real life is another matter. But it helps to remember that the ultimate source of value comes from us: the needs we share, the things we enjoy, and the choices we make.

On this, the “ultimate source of value” is not so humanistic as Agarwal frames it here, but in a Christian context, such a statement does illuminate the capacity God has given us as image bearers and co-creators. The important thing is that we don’t forget the actual beginning and end of that service.

Again, there is much we can learn from earthbound approaches to maximizing “utility” and “happiness,” but our economic imaginations are meant to stretch much wider and higher than this, resisting idols of hedonism and utility and pressing on toward truth and goodness and beauty.

Ours is an economic witness that meets material needs and lifts up the “least of these” through work and trade and innovation, but our origins and ends are not made of stuff of the earth.

Our approach to “value” and the pursuit thereof is bound to fall short if it fails to harmonize the material and the transcendent. At its core, our economic witness is only as powerful as its foundation in faithfulness to a decision-maker of a different sort — propelled by the power of the Spirit and oriented toward the glory of God in all things.

Originally published at the Acton PowerBlog

Previous Post

November 15, 2016

Technology Seen and Unseen

Next Post

November 30, 2016 Are Christianity and Communism Mutually Exclusive?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Art Charity Church Common Grace Culture Curriculum Economics Education Family Justice Order Theology Uncategorized Vocation Wisdom Wonder Work

Select a Month January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What holiday celebrates Jesus’ birth?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Easter Ascension Day Christmas Good Friday