Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Oikonomia

Home
Business, Finance and Religion
Retailers and the ‘Religion of Consumption’

Retailers and the ‘Religion of Consumption’

Last updated on: October 15, 2015 at 11:06 am by Acton Institute

Retailers and the ‘Religion of Consumption’ 2015-10-15T11:06:00-04:00 Acton Institute

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

By Jordan Ballor

cart There’s an intriguing piece in the NYT from last month by Hiroko Tabuchi that explores some of the challenges facing traditional retailers, “Stores Suffer From a Shift of Behavior in Buyers.” (HT: Sarah Pulliam Bailey)

Department stores like Macy’s and Kohl’s seem to be losing out on the rebound in consumer spending, writes Tabuchi. “Department stores made up one of just two categories tracked by the Commerce Department where spending declined, the latest in a choppy performance from them this year. Spending at electronics and appliance stores also fell 1.2 percent in July.”

One major explanation offered by Tabuchi’s sources is that this is part of a larger paradigm shift in American consumer attitude. “The religion of consumption has proven to be unfulfilling,” says Richard E. Jaffe, a retailing analyst, “The ‘pile it high and watch it fly’ mentality at department stores no longer works.”

Research has been touted in various outlets that spending money on “experiences” rather than “things” is more fulfilling. This observation makes some intuitive sense, of course, in that human beings are not merely material consumers but are also designed for human relationship. Where experiences help to nurture and strengthen such relational ties, it is easy to see why they might be more fulfilling than the relatively impersonal exchanges that characterize the extended commercial order.

In other ways, however, this contrast between “experiences” and “things” cuts too simply. Kabuchi closes with a quote from Rajiv Lal, professor of retailing at Harvard Business School. “With affluence, people have so much stuff in their closet,” Lal says. “And if they don’t see anything in stores they fancy, they’ll seek out experiences. It’s experience versus the mundane.” Perhaps in America many of us have simply grown so affluent that our material needs are largely met and so our disposable income can reasonably be expended on things higher on Maslow’s hierarchy of needs.

I think there’s something more going on here, though. Tabuchi notes that people aren’t necessarily spending less; they’re spending differently and in different places. The shift may be less simply “experiences” over “things” than, at least in some cases, “internet” over “brick and mortar.”

Along with a partial (not total) shift from analog to digital, there are other shifts: away from big toward small, away from distant to local. Big corporations aren’t going away, but there is also a larger sociological trend away from “big” institutions, including big business. Large department store chains are likely to suffer as many traditional suburban malls suffer. But as Joel Kotkin rightly notes, things are more complex: “It’s clear the mall is transforming itself to meet the needs of a changing society but is hardly in its death throes.”

Moreover, the idea that a “religion of consumption” might only apply to material goods, and not sensual experiences, is a pretty truncated and flawed understanding of hedonistic materialism. People can just as easily “consume” experiences as they can things, with little significant moral and spiritual difference.

If the “experience” over “things” explanation captured the key causal factors, you could expect big department stores, along with malls and the suburbs, to simply wither away. Kotkin concludes, however, that malls and retailers find success through transforming, in part by increasingly selling the shopping “experience” and their stores as “destinations.” As my wife certainly knows, shopping can be an experience, and one that builds relationships…perhaps not so much with the retailers as with her friends.

Thus these traditional retailers may be facing a more complex set of factors, not so easily captured in an “experiences” vs. “things” distinction, that, without responsive transformation, would represent larger threats to their sustainability over the long term.

Originally published at the Acton PowerBlog

Photo credit: Rick Harris

Previous Post

October 13, 2015

Immigrants, Refugees, and the Conversionary Tale of Jean Valjean

Next Post

October 19, 2015 6 Quotes: Angus Deaton on Poverty

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Art Charity Church Common Grace Culture Curriculum Economics Education Family Justice Order Theology Uncategorized Vocation Wisdom Wonder Work

Select a Month January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

True or False: Peter preached the first sermon after Pentecost, leading to 3,000 conversions.

Select your answer to see how you score.

FALSE TRUE