Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

The Northampton Seminar

A history of Israel – Part 1

Last updated on: May 24, 2017 at 12:29 pm   by Gerald McDermott

A history of Israel – Part 1 2017-05-24T12:29:29-04:00 Gerald McDermott

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

jerusalem-1065008_640This is the first post in a series on the history of Israel.

Why now?  For two reasons.  The most immediate is the new attention to Israeli-Palestinian negotiations, which President Trump wants to restart.

The other reason is that anti-Israel sentiment has heightened in recent years.   More and more today’s Israel and its Zionist history are said to be oppressive and racist.  Since the appeal is primarily to present practice that is rooted in history, to history we will turn.

I will start with a recent essay by two Israeli scholars who explore the relation between the Bible’s story of the occupation of Canaan under Joshua, and modern Zionism.  Then beginning tomorrow I  will take us through a new book by David Brog, Reclaiming Israel’s History: Roots, Rights, and the Struggle for Peace (Regency).

Here are highlights from the essay by Yonina Dor and Naomi De-Malach, two Bible and literature scholars who teach at a College of Education in Israel.  The title is “Teaching Bible Stories Critically: ‘They Did Not Spare a Soul’–The Book of Joshua in an Israeli Secular Education Environment,” in Athalya Brenner and Gale Yee, eds., Joshua and Judges (Fortress, 2013), 39-68.

  1. The book of Joshua was once thought to be relevant to Zionism, but its plain meaning is now hard to accept.  For it suggests at one level that an entire population was wiped out–man, woman, and child–because it was occupying land which God had promised to Jews and those gentiles who had joined themselves to Israel.
  2. Just as Talmudic rabbis justified the violence of Joshua, contemporary Israeli commentators on Joshua justify the violence wreaked on non-Jews “as required by the situation”  (42).
  3. David Ben-Gurion placed the book of Joshua at the center of Zionism, saying Joshua was the true founder of the Jewish nation (42).
  4. The killings and expulsions carried out during the War of Independence (1948-49) drew their inspiration from the book of Joshua (43).
  5. The current scholarly consensus is that there is little historical basis for the story of Joshua, that instead there was very gradual infiltration of Canaan, and that the stories of Rahab at Jericho and the Gibeonite ruse suggest a history of compromise with the inhabitants.  But the story of mass killing was written later, perhaps after the Exile, to motivate Jews not to mix with their idolatrous neighbors (46-47, 55-56).

The authors claim that the gruesome story of Joshua was an inspiration for Zionists.  But they (the authors) never say what form that inspiration took.  Most importantly, they never claim that Zionists had the intent of wiping out whole populations of Arabs, or that they wanted to expel all Arabs from the land.  If there were some extremist Zionists with these goals, as there are such extremists in all histories of peoples returning to their lands, the authors never distinguish such extremists from those Zionists who wanted to live in peace alongside Arabs.  As we will see, the true history of Zionism is dominated by the latter.  We shall also see that Ben Gurion was among them.

Here is an analogy: there were Patriots during our own Revolution who attacked and sometimes killed fellow colonists (non-combatants) who did not support the break from England.  Today we condemn these “extremist” Patriots, and distinguish them from the majority of patriots who did not like the “Loyalists” but supported a live-and-let-live policy toward them.  To say that all Zionists supported the killing and removal of all Arabs–in the absence of historical evidence–is like saying that all American patriots wanted to kill the one-third of their fellow colonists who were Loyalists.

Uncategorized

Previous Post



May 19, 2017

Protestants and Natural Law

Next Post



May 25, 2017 Palestinians: a nation without a state


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month March 2023 November 2022 October 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 November 2021 October 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 July 2020 June 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 August 2019 July 2019 May 2019 April 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was the oldest man recorded in Genesis?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Noah Enoch Methuselah Jared

Related posts from The Northampton Seminar

Evangelical

Jesus and Jewish law

The Northampton Seminar

Evangelical

Interview on what difference Jesus' Jewishness makes and...

The Northampton Seminar

Evangelical

News from Israel--the election and Messianic Jews

The Northampton Seminar

Evangelical

The third rail in conservative churches

The Northampton Seminar

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Evangelical

The REST of Your Life: A Creative Wrestles...

This week I had a conversation with a good friend from church....

How the author of the world's best hymn...

I've been working with John Newton for a while now. This makes...

Psalm 130 | Lectio Divina

Long before this Lectio Divina, Psalm 130 - the song - started...

What About the Trees? Another Living Parable

After I finished writing the last article about falling leaves as a...

Why Classical Education Is a Conversation, Not a...

Come and Read: Joy in Classical Education When I was a little...

What Happened at Cornell?

Cornell University has received a great deal of negative publicity and intense...

view all Evangelical blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube