Liturgy and Eucharist – Part XVII (and final)

Last updated on: May 6, 2017 at 5:36 pm by Gerald McDermott

Liturgy and Eucharist – Part XVII (and final) 2017-05-06T17:36:27-04:00 Gerald McDermott

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I once had a Ivy League PhD colleague, trained in New Testament, who refused to talk about “early Christianity.” Instead, for this scholar, there was only a multiplicity of early Christianities. This colleague seemed to regard talk of early church consensus as naive–ignorant of all the variant views and practices of the first-century followers of Jesus.

This colleague was trained by scholars who refused to speak of early orthodoxy, or if they used the word, it referred to “the winners” who used power to push aside those disagreed.

Of course these scholars had some reason for their approaches. There was indeed considerable variation in practice and belief, and over time those who established “orthodoxy” became dominant over those judged to be heretical.

Funny thing, though. These colleagues who disdained talk of consensus or orthodoxy often came to prefer one view of Jesus and argued for its coherence and historical legitimacy. In other words, they established their own sense of orthodoxy and heresy, though it was usually the flip side of what has come to be regarded as historical orthodoxy by most historical theologians today.

My former colleague reminds me of Bradshaw. He (Bradshaw) is impatient with those who speak of any liturgical consensus in the first four centuries, and wants to keep reminding us of enormous diversity. And of course he shows us proof of considerable diversity. We can indeed learn from him that Dix was wrong on some conclusions he drew. There was no single line of development, nor was there an original rite that persisted from day one through the next centuries.

Yet Dix was not as naive as some critics have charged. Dix himself admitted that there were “big gaps in our knowledge” of liturgy all the way up through the third century. He wrote of “remarkable differences” among the “great historic families of liturgies.” He conceded that his “shape of the liturgy” did not emerge clearly until the later fourth century, even if the basic elements were there most of the time from the very beginning.

But if I were to assign books to students who wanted to learn theology of liturgy and sacrament, I would most definitely include Dix. For in Dix there is vision of the beauty of holiness. He writes with passion and a certain lyrical quality. In this day when so many Christians are wanting to catch a glimpse of the beauty of liturgy and sacrament as billions of Christians have experienced them through the ages, Dix provides it in an unparalleled way for Anglicans. To my mind, only the Orthodox Schmemann (For the Life of the World) and Catholic Ratzinger (The Spirit of the Liturgy) rival Dix for rhetorical power and vision.

Bradshaw is good for the history of liturgy and sacrament, showing us its many parts and how some were preferred over others in the fourth century. But in Dix the Anglican reader finds in unique fashion the compelling meaning of the Eucharist:

As Ignatius put it, when the whole church prays and offers the Eucharist, it is recalling before God the offering of Christ.
As Dix puts it, the Eucharist is the irruption into time of the heavenly Christ actualizing an eternal redemption. It is anamnesis, which is not merely mental remembrance of past history but bringing the past into the present, lifting partakers up to heaven in sacramental time where our High Priest is now appearing with his blood on our behalf.
But it is even more than simply his blood that Christ is offering. As Jesus said, anamnesis is bringing to our vision not only his death but him (Lk 22:19), because he is being perpetually accepted by the Father on our behalf.
For the early church, the Body of Christ is not only itself literally in heaven but also the sacrament. Neither is a mere metaphor. It is the coming of the church to the Father in Christ by the Spirit, and so the church entering into the Kingdom here and now, entering into its eternal being.

Dix charts the history of how the church has lost this eschatological meaning of the Eucharist, where the church as a body enters into the eternal act of worship by the Son of the Father. He shows how the church, beginning in the fourth century and then especially in the medieval and Reformation periods, turned the Eucharist into an act of individual piety watching what is performed at the front by the priest, which has become a merely mental remembrance of an historical act in the first century.

For both the beauty of his vision–which seems to this reader to capture the vision of the New Testament and the Fathers–and his history of the loss of this vision, Dix is essential for Anglicans. He can also be a great help to all Christians who seek to understand what modern Christianity has lost in liturgy and sacraments.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

May 4, 2017

Liturgy and Eucharist - Part XVI

Next Post

May 13, 2017 What dogs teach us about God - Part 1

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month March 2023 November 2022 October 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 November 2021 October 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 July 2020 June 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 August 2019 July 2019 May 2019 April 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz