Does Trump threaten academic freedom?

Last updated on: November 12, 2016 at 5:41 pm by Gerald McDermott

Does Trump threaten academic freedom? 2016-11-12T17:41:17-04:00 Gerald McDermott

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The American Association of University Professors (AAUP) thinks so. They cite his remarks on minorities, immigrants and women that have a “chilling effect on the rights” of students and professors “to speak out”; his call for an “ideological screening test” for immigrants; his desire to nominate a Supreme Court Justice like Antonin Scalia who might jeopardize university faculty unions; and his denial of climate change and “the validity of science itself.”

Michael McClymond, professor of theology at St. Louis University, is not so sure. He wonders why the AAUP has been silent about threats to academic freedom that already exist, such as “the call for university ‘safe spaces’ and the rejection of ‘platforming’ (i.e., allowance of space to speak) for those holding and expressing controversial opinions.”

Here is his letter to the Director of the AAUP:

Professor Fichtenbaum:

I just received your AAUP mail, which included the following in the opening paragraph:

“It would be foolish, however, to deny that most college and university faculty members did not support the election of Donald Trump. Many no doubt fear that his election threatens some of the core institutions of our democracy and may be the greatest threat to academic freedom since the McCarthy period.”

I am afraid that I cannot go along with either of your premises in sending this email.

Firstly, unless you have access to data indicating how university faculty members voted in the presidential election, then it seems to me that you really don’t know and can’t presume to know how faculty members might have voted. (For the record, I did not vote for Donald Trump as president.) Isn’t the premise of your email an uninformed personal opinion? And why should you send out this mass email with nothing more to back it than an uninformed personal opinion? Neither you nor I know for certain how people might have cast their votes in the privacy of the ballot box.

Secondly, and perhaps more substantively, it should be clear by now that there have been recent, major challenges to academic freedom and free expression in the university in recent years that long preceded the election of Donald Trump, just this week. I am referring to the call for university “safe spaces” and the rejection of “platforming” (i.e., allowance of space to speak) for those holding and expressing controversial opinions.

My PhD alma mater–the University of Chicago–has recently affirmed their unconditional commitment to free speech in the American university context. This outstanding university responded to challenges to free speech arising out of so-called political correctness, and not to the vulgar bluster of President-Elect Trump, which seems unlikely to affect academic free-speech policies in the near or long term. (How much does Trump reallycare about the universities anyway? And how could he possibly restrict or regulate them as US president?)

Your email message thus seems to me to place its emphasis in precisely the wrong place. It largely ignores the genuine challenges to free speech in the universities that have emerged in recent years–and which the University of Chicago specifically sought to address–while going off to “fence at dragons” by envisioning some sort of repressive future enactment restricting free speech under President-Elect Trump.

Would it not make more sense for AAUP simply to reaffirm its free speech policy, rather to engage in post-election handwringing and anxious anticipation of future consequences that may never materialize? Why not focus on the free speech issue that exists right now, rather than the any that might or might not exist in the future?

Appreciatively,

Michael J. McClymond

Professor of Modern Christianity

Department of Theological Studies

Saint Louis University

Uncategorized

Previous Post

November 12, 2016

What is liturgy?

Next Post

November 13, 2016 The Pope does not understand China

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month March 2023 November 2022 October 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 November 2021 October 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 July 2020 June 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 August 2019 July 2019 May 2019 April 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz