Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

The Northampton Seminar

Is Abbas right?

Last updated on: September 23, 2016 at 3:24 pm   by Gerald McDermott

Is Abbas right? 2016-09-23T15:24:02-04:00 Gerald McDermott

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The Wall Street Journal reports this morning that Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas told the United Nations yesterday that he is going to present a Security Council resolution declaring Israel’s settlements on the West Bank illegal.

This is part of a his larger claim that Israel’s continued occupation of the West Bank is a violation of international law—specifically UN Resolution 242.

Is it?

According to this resolution, Israeli withdrawal was to take place in the context of mutual recognition of the right to exist and territorial adjustments to achieve secure boundaries.  Withdrawal was ordered from “territories,” not “the territories.”  Both Arthur Goldberg and Lord Carrington, the primary authors of this resolution, have said that the word “the” was purposely omitted because it was not intended for Israel to give back all of her territories, since they recognized that some were needed for secure boundaries.

Despite the fact that most Arab states have refused to recognize Israel’s right to exist (a condition of Resolution 242), Israel has implemented the principles of the Resolution three times.  When Egypt terminated its claims of belligerency in 1979, Israel returned the Sinai.  When Jordan signed a peace agreement, Israel returned land claimed by Jordan.  Then in September 2005 Israel unilaterally withdrew from Gaza, only to be met with new attacks on her civilians launched from that territory.

The charge of illegal occupation must therefore be rejected.  Israel has made repeated efforts to comply with UN stipulations for the territories, while her Arab neighbors have not.

When the Palestinians appeared to accept Israel’s right to exist during the Oslo negotiations, Israel turned over control of major West Bank cities to the Palestinian Authority (PA).  But when the PA showed support for terrorist attacks on Israeli citizens in 2000, Israel resumed control of those cities.  In that same year Israel offered to return 92% of the West Bank, which some dismiss as ungenerous because, they claim, Israel never owned the land in the first place.

Yet Jews have lived in ancient Samaria (the West Bank) for over three thousand years. Jordan unilaterally renounced all claims to this area in 1988 and released legal ownership to Israel at that time.  Many anti-Zionists suggest Jews should remove all settlements from the West Bank, leaving it entirely for Palestinians.  That would be as unreasonable as insisting that no Arabs can live in Judaea or the Galilee.  Yet Jews are happy to live with two million Arab Israeli citizens in Judaea and Galilee.  Besides, what other country has been required to give up land that it won in a defensive war?  Do Germans displaced from Koenigsberg clamor and agitate for that German city to be returned to them by the victorious Russians?

Critics of “the occupation” also claim the settlements in the West Bank violate Article 49 of the Fourth Geneva Convention.  This is ironic because this Convention was adopted to prevent crimes like the Nazi deportation of Jews to death camps.  The Article prohibits “individual or mass transfers, as well as deportations of protected persons from occupied territory to the territory of the Occupying Power or that of any other country, occupied or not.” But no Israelis are being deported against their will—they are moving voluntarily; nor is any Palestinian Arab being deported or transferred.  And legal settlements, which are on only 3% of the West Bank, were bought by agreement with Arabs.

Besides, the Article refers to a “High Contracting Party” with a sovereign claim to territory.  The West Bank is not the territory of a signatory power, but, as Eugene Rostow stated in an article in 1990, “an unallocated part of the British Mandate.”  The “green line” that determines important boundaries of the West Bank was simply the cease-fire line at the end of the 1948-49 war between Arabs and the new Jewish state.  The Armistice Agreement of 1949 stated that the demarcation lines were “not to be construed in any sense” as “political or territorial boundaries.”  True boundaries would be made only with “the ultimate peaceful settlement of the Palestine problem.”  In the intervening years Jordan moved into the West Bank without any international approval or official recognition, and then withdrew after attacking Israel in 1967 and being defeated.

It would be helpful to get a sense of proportion by recalling a few facts.  In the San Remo Treaty of 1920, the victors of the First World War created a territory called “Palestine,” comprised now by what are called Jordan, Israel, the West Bank, and Gaza.  This was one percent of the former Ottoman Empire, 99% of which was transferred eventually to self-governing states with mostly Arab and Turkish populations.  In 1922 the League of Nations in the Palestine Mandate stipulated “close Jewish settlement” on the land west of the Jordan River, which includes what we call the West Bank. That same year the UK created the new Arab country of Jordan, which meant that Britain gave three-fourths of the Mandate to Arabs and one-fourth to Jews.  The West Bank was part of that one-fourth.  The Mandate has never been abrogated and endures today.

Uncategorized

Previous Post



September 20, 2016

An extraordinary Palestinian

Next Post



September 26, 2016 Why there won't be peace in Israel for a long time


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month March 2023 November 2022 October 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 November 2021 October 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 July 2020 June 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 August 2019 July 2019 May 2019 April 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who killed his own brother out of jealousy and became the first murderer in the Bible?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Ishmael Cain Esau Jacob

Related posts from The Northampton Seminar

Evangelical

Jesus and Jewish law

The Northampton Seminar

Evangelical

Interview on what difference Jesus' Jewishness makes and...

The Northampton Seminar

Evangelical

News from Israel--the election and Messianic Jews

The Northampton Seminar

Evangelical

The third rail in conservative churches

The Northampton Seminar

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Evangelical

The REST of Your Life: A Creative Wrestles...

This week I had a conversation with a good friend from church....

How the author of the world's best hymn...

I've been working with John Newton for a while now. This makes...

Psalm 130 | Lectio Divina

Long before this Lectio Divina, Psalm 130 - the song - started...

What About the Trees? Another Living Parable

After I finished writing the last article about falling leaves as a...

Why Classical Education Is a Conversation, Not a...

Come and Read: Joy in Classical Education When I was a little...

What Happened at Cornell?

Cornell University has received a great deal of negative publicity and intense...

view all Evangelical blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube