The men not the menu

Last updated on: July 19, 2016 at 6:47 am by Gerald McDermott

The men not the menu 2016-07-19T06:47:12-04:00 Gerald McDermott

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Friends, this is the last of my series on Jesus and food laws. (If you are late to this series, scroll down to July 12, where it started.) I trust you have seen that Mark 7.19b is critical to a millennia-long debate over the relationship between Judaism and Christianity, and whether Jesus and Paul were starting a new religion called Christianity that is a radical departure from the Judaism of their day. This discussion also gets at the role of the Law in the Christian life.

Today we will look at the Acts 10-11 passage about Peter’s vision of the sheet coming down with unclean animals. Many have asked, Doesn’t this prove that God told Peter to eat unclean foods? That kosher and the Law were therefore defunct?

I want to show you that we are told four times in this story that what was at issue was the men, not the menu. God was indeed teaching something new to Peter, but it was about table fellowship, not the food on the table. Peter had been instructed by a rigorist school of Pharisees (not all Pharisees had the same views), perhaps like those who followed Shammai, that Jews were never to eat with gentiles, for the latter were unclean and would make the Jews unclean. This was taught by these Pharisees but this rule itself was not taught by Torah.

We all remember that God showed Peter a sheet with unclean animals on it, God told Peter to kill and eat them, and Peter protested that he had “never eaten anything that is profane or unclean” (10.14).

As I have said several times in the last few days, note that this was years after Jesus talked about “all foods being cleansed” (Mk 7.19b) and yet Peter was still refraining from certain foods. Was Peter a slow learner? Did he ignore what Jesus had said? Or did Peter realize that Jesus was not doing away with kosher laws but instead talking about Gentiles?

Let’s get back to the story. Once Peter and his entourage arrived in Caesarea at Cornelius’ house, Peter, who had done a lot of thinking on the several-day journey to Caesarea, said that he now realized the meaning of the vision was fellowship not food: “You yourselves know that it is unlawful for a Jew to associate with or visit a gentile; but God has shown me that I should not call anyone profane or unclean” (10.28). The uncleanness is about people, not foods. This is the first mention.

Here is the second: Later in the conversation Peter refers to the meaning of the vision again. “I truly understand that God hows no partiality, but in every nation anyone who fears him and does what is right is acceptable to him” (10.34-35). Again it is about people not foods.

Third: When Peter went up to Jerusalem to report on these extraordinary events, those who were apparently also of the rigorist Pharisaic party (but now following Yeshua) asked him why he joined in fellowship with gentiles: Why did you go to uncircumcised men and eat with them?” (11.2)

Fourth: Peter’s response to their challenge shows yet again that the issue was men not the menu: “The Spirit told me to go with them and not to make a distinction between them and us” (11.12).

There is no sign in this long story that Peter ever ate unkosher food.

Peter learned a lesson about fellowship with gentiles, who were different but equal now in the Body of Messiah. There is no lesson here about the end of the legal parts of Torah, or the end of kosher for Jews, or the rejection of Torah as a guide for Jews.

Bottom line for this series. Jesus was doing a new thing, but it was not starting a new religion that departed radically from the Judaism of his day. It was not a rejection of Torah or its food laws. Jesus put Torah in a whole new light, and showed that his obedience to it saves, and that no Jew’s imperfect obedience to it could ever save. But Torah stays, reinterpreted as the Torah of the messiah.

This is what Paul meant in Galatians 6.2 by “the law of Christ”: the Torah of the messiah.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

July 18, 2016

More on Galatians

Next Post

July 20, 2016 The problem and the solution

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month March 2023 November 2022 October 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 November 2021 October 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 July 2020 June 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 August 2019 July 2019 May 2019 April 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz