Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

The Northampton Seminar

Vanderbilt provost encourages students calling for Swain’s ouster

Last updated on: November 17, 2015 at 7:52 am   by Gerald McDermott

Vanderbilt provost encourages students calling for Swain’s ouster 2015-11-17T07:52:58-04:00 Gerald McDermott

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Yesterday the provost of Vanderbilt wrote a letter to the student body about the growing controversy over Professor Carol Swain, the conservative African-American who teaches politics at Vanderbilt Law School and has dared to criticize Islam and gay marriage.  In retaliation a petition calling for her ouster has gathered more than 1500 signatures.

The provost wrote, “Freedom to share ideas . . . is not the freedom to take actions that discriminate against or threaten others.”  She did not qualify her words.  As a result, readers could get the impression that Swain’s words were “actions”  that are guilty of discrimination, and therefore that the crybullies are justified to call for her suspension.

Let’s think about what provost Susan Wente is saying.  Is it wrong to say or write things that discriminate?  Or threaten others?

All true discourse discriminates between what is true and false, good and evil.  Without discrimination in thinking, there is no good judgment.

This provost’s statement is what truly threatens.  Issued without precision, it threatens speech and freedom.  For it suggests that any public declaration that distinguishes between good religion and bad religion, healthy social practice and unhealthy social practice, should not be tolerated.  This is the antithesis of what a good university stands for—freedom to share ideas that threaten previous thinking.  Or that threaten the status quo.

Of course all of us should be against threatening the physical person of others.

But what if our ideas threaten the thinking and feelings of others?  All important intellectual exchange threatens the thinking and feelings of others, especially if that thinking is new and different.

A university that stands by that provost’s statement is embracing fear and mediocrity, and has instantly disqualified itself from the roster of world-class institutions of free learning.

Thankfully, Daniel Greenfield at Front Page has got the number of these student protestors.  Here are some selections from his valuable article, “Angry White Leftists Target a Black Conservative Woman.”

“The petition to force a conservative black woman to undergo diversity training comes from Nick Goldbach, a white hipster student and self-described ‘urban enthusiast’ who claims that working as a waiter at a ‘sustainable’ luxury urban resort in Connecticut taught him about ‘common humanity.'”

“Emmie, who isn’t even at Vanderbilt, has accused Dr. Swain of creating an ‘unsafe environment for students who face enough danger off campus.’ What danger does a 61-year-old African-American PhD pose to Vanderbilt students? Does she beat them up in hallways? Does she secretly tempt them with gluten? Does she menace them with sharp objects while they sip Organic Kale Tonic from Whole Foods?”

“When Dr. Swain responded to their insulting racist petition by saying that ‘[o]nly an idiot would think a 61-year-old black woman who has spent most of her life in academia would benefit from sensitivity training,’ she was accused of ableism.”

“The professor had committed the ultimate hate crime. She had been insensitive to idiots.”

“Alyssa Janco, another white Vanderbilt student targeting Dr. Swain, barks, ‘Professor Swain is free to believe and say whatever she’d like; but freedom of speech does not equate to freedom from consequences.’ That exact argument has been used by every totalitarian regime in the world. It is telling that the left has embraced the argument that it once rejected simply because it is in power now.”

Uncategorized

Previous Post



November 16, 2015

Help defend Carol Swain

Next Post



November 18, 2015 Anti-Zionists misread the Bible


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month March 2023 November 2022 October 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 November 2021 October 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 July 2020 June 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 August 2019 July 2019 May 2019 April 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

How many books are in the New Testament?

Select your answer to see how you score.

27 24 39 21

Related posts from The Northampton Seminar

Evangelical

Jesus and Jewish law

The Northampton Seminar

Evangelical

Interview on what difference Jesus' Jewishness makes and...

The Northampton Seminar

Evangelical

News from Israel--the election and Messianic Jews

The Northampton Seminar

Evangelical

The third rail in conservative churches

The Northampton Seminar

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Evangelical

The REST of Your Life: A Creative Wrestles...

This week I had a conversation with a good friend from church....

How the author of the world's best hymn...

I've been working with John Newton for a while now. This makes...

Psalm 130 | Lectio Divina

Long before this Lectio Divina, Psalm 130 - the song - started...

What About the Trees? Another Living Parable

After I finished writing the last article about falling leaves as a...

Why Classical Education Is a Conversation, Not a...

Come and Read: Joy in Classical Education When I was a little...

What Happened at Cornell?

Cornell University has received a great deal of negative publicity and intense...

view all Evangelical blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube