Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

The Northampton Seminar

All the King’s men are falling down

Last updated on: June 13, 2015 at 6:57 am   by Gerald McDermott

All the King’s men are falling down 2015-06-13T06:57:32-04:00 Gerald McDermott

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

So now even David Neff, recently editor of Christianity Today, says gay marriage can be Christian.  He was cheering Tony Campolo’s announcement that Christians should recognize that supposed truth.

Some of us have known that Campolo has been thinking this way for years, and that he was providing in his books  hints about his post-biblical, unorthodox position for a good long time.

Neff is a friend and colleague.  I am frankly surprised but not shocked.  David held the line in his years at CT, where CT often gave reasoned arguments for the only position good reason and exegesis can support–that gay practice is disordered and clearly proscribed by Scripture and the Christian moral tradition.

But now other leaders in the erstwhile “evangelical” world are having second thoughts.  The New York Times breathlessly reports that Biola professors agreed that “in the Bible, God did not destroy Sodom and Gomorrah because of sodomy, but because the residents were guilty of arrogance and greed.”

Did Biola professors at this meeting with Matthew Vines really agree that the judgment of Sodom had nothing to do with what is called sodomy?  The grey lady of New York is not known for reporting orthodoxy accurately.

But even if they did not all agree, the now-lionized-by-the-evangelical-left-and-the-cultural-elite Matthew Vines thinks so, as do some  scholars (the best scholars do not).  (By the way, Vines’ book is a good example of superficial and downright wrong treatment of biblical scholarship on this issue, as Timothy George has recently reported.)

Is that true, then, about Sodom?

Not at all.

The newly enlightened claim that Sodom’s sin was against hospitality not sex because, in part, the Hebrew word yāda, which traditionalists have interpreted as “know” in the biblical sense, occurs 943 times in the Hebrew Bible but has a sexual meaning in only ten of those instances.   (The men of Sodom urged Lot to “bring [his guests] out, that we may know them.”)

Yet six of these ten instances are in Genesis, and one of these is used of Lot’s daughter who had not “known” a man (just three verses after Sodom’s men said they wanted to “know” Lot’s visitors).  While it is true that later Old Testament passages do not refer to sex sin in Sodom, intertestamental Jewish literature did (Jubilees 16.5-6 and the 12 Patriarchs, both written in the 2nd century before Christ, when Jews were alarmed by Hellenistic acceptance of homoeroticism) and Jude’s clear reference (7) to the same suggests that New Testament authors understood Sodom’s sin in this way.

Vines and others in the newly enlightened evangelicals also dismiss Leviticus 18.22 and 20.13 (where man-on-man sex is said to be  tô`ēbâ or “abominable”) because they are found alongside other passages that are concerned with ritual (such as the prohibition of sex during menstruation) not moral purity. Yet the vast majority of Leviticus 18 and 20 (89 of 94 verses) deal not with ritual purity but moral issues. They command respect for parents and the elderly, concern for the poor, honesty in court, and love for neighbor (including the alien). They condemn child sacrifice, bestiality, adultery, incest, idolatry, theft, deceit, slander, revenge, sorcery, cursing parents, and dishonest business practices.  Therefore it is likely that the author or editor of these chapters considered homosexual practice to be a moral concern, not a matter of ritual purity.

Besides, in the long list of prohibited practices in these chapters, only one is singled out as tô`ēbâ or “abominable”: same-sex intercourse.  The ritually “impure” practices in Leviticus (childbirth, seminal emissions, heterosexual intercourse, and menstruation) are not punished but purified by bathing and sacrifice.

Mark Galli, CT’s new editor, is right to say this week that the vast majority of Christians in the world today are still orthodox on this issue.  It seems in our little corner that all the King’s men are falling, but the King actually has his pockets of leaders all over the world who are among the seven thousands (1 Kings 19.18), and hundreds of millions more of faithful parishioners who know that no matter what evangelical leaders say and think, reason and scripture and tradition are agreed that marriage is between a man and a woman.  And that those who think otherwise have been sadly deceived.

Uncategorized

Previous Post



May 13, 2015

Three criticisms of Christian Zionism

Next Post



June 14, 2015 Is God unfair?


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month March 2023 November 2022 October 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 November 2021 October 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 July 2020 June 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 August 2019 July 2019 May 2019 April 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What did Peter see in his vision on the rooftop in Joppa?

Select your answer to see how you score.

An angel with a sword A ladder reaching to heaven A burning bush A large sheet with unclean animals

Related posts from The Northampton Seminar

Evangelical

Jesus and Jewish law

The Northampton Seminar

Evangelical

Interview on what difference Jesus' Jewishness makes and...

The Northampton Seminar

Evangelical

News from Israel--the election and Messianic Jews

The Northampton Seminar

Evangelical

The third rail in conservative churches

The Northampton Seminar

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Evangelical

The REST of Your Life: A Creative Wrestles...

This week I had a conversation with a good friend from church....

How the author of the world's best hymn...

I've been working with John Newton for a while now. This makes...

Psalm 130 | Lectio Divina

Long before this Lectio Divina, Psalm 130 - the song - started...

What About the Trees? Another Living Parable

After I finished writing the last article about falling leaves as a...

Why Classical Education Is a Conversation, Not a...

Come and Read: Joy in Classical Education When I was a little...

What Happened at Cornell?

Cornell University has received a great deal of negative publicity and intense...

view all Evangelical blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube