How a Decadent Culture Makes Me Think Like Sorokin

Last updated on: February 13, 2015 at 11:28 am by Guest Contributor

How a Decadent Culture Makes Me Think Like Sorokin 2015-02-13T11:28:59-04:00 Guest Contributor

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Robert Benne

Our newspaper carried for many years a celebrated local columnist who identified himself as a “semi-hysterical” reporter. He used an amusing ploy when some minor disaster overtook him, such as his dog eating his newly written column. Then, he said, he was shocked into writing like Ernest Hemingway. He proceeded to write in macho sentences, short and crisp, for the rest of the column.

I experience something similar when I become inordinately discouraged by the decadence of American culture. I begin to think like Pitirim A. Sorokin (1889-1968). Sorokin, now much out of favor among sociologists, was already beginning to fade when I entered graduate school in the late 50s. He was a fascinating figure. Born in Russia and steeped in Russian Orthodoxy, Sorokin spent time in jail because of his resistance to the Czar. He was a functionary in the Kerensky regime, but that of course was temporary. After the revolution he studied sociology, law, and penology, and begin writing books in those areas. He sharply criticized the new Communist regime and was faced with the choices of imprisonment, execution, or exile. He took exile. He emigrated to the United States, taught sociology at the University of Minnesota, and then founded the Department of Sociology at Harvard. Giving up his earlier commitment to “empirical” sociology, he developed what one could call a normative sociology, one which was informed by his own philosophical and religious commitments. Combative and sarcastic, Sorokin engaged in some celebrated academic conflicts. His rival sociologist at Harvard, Talcott Parsons, finally had him removed from his position as head of the department in 1955. He continued writing until his death in 1968, focusing on the necessary role of altruism in any wholesome social life.

We students read his The Crisis of Our Age (1941) in which he developed his then famous theory of cultural cycles. He argued that cultures moved from ideational cultures in which transcendent truth claims and moral norms were the organizing principles of social life, to idealistic cultures, in which there was a creative blend of the ideational and the sensate, to sensate cultures, which were focused on sensory perceptions and experiences. This latter stage rejected transcendent values and moved toward decadence and chaos, within which would be born a new ideational culture. The transitions between cycles are characterized by violent upheavals. Sorokin thought the period of World War II was such an upheaval, one which marked the end of a sensate cycle and presaged the dawning of a new ideational phase.

Needless to say, the West has not experienced a new birth of religious commitment, but one could argue that such is happening in the growth of Christianity in Africa and the resurgence of Islam. But that is not where I want to pick up Sorokin’s thinking. Rather, I think he was definitely on to something profound when he argued that pre-modern cultures were guided by what they considered to be transcendent norms. Israel believed the Law was a holy revelation from God and organized her life around that transcendent point of reference. Christianity reverenced the Law but also believed in the revelation of Christ as the supreme point of reference. Christ was the focal point in which God’s dimension poured into ours, not only revealing the will of God to us mortals but also performing saving acts. The Catholic Church organized a whole “Christ Above Culture” model of social life, which in due time became Christendom.

It is arguable that Western history has been decisively shaped by the normative notions of Christendom. We have lived off the capital that was initiated by the ideational revelation of the Christ event, developed and tended by the Catholic Church. From the Renaissance, Reformation, and Enlightenment onward for several centuries we had what Sorokin called an “idealistic” culture—a creative blend of the ideational and the sensate. But now the residue of even the idealistic culture is fast receding and we are moving deeply into a sensate culture.

More specifically, sensate culture emphasizes sensory experience as the guiding principle of human life. The adjectives Sorokin uses are—“sensational, passionate, pathetic, sensual, incessantly new, radically oriented toward the empirical world, materialistic.” He has major discussions of sensate art, philosophy, ethics, law, and family. Though he wrote around the time of the World War II, many of his insights can be applied to the contemporary world.

Take popular music, for example. Exposure to popular music makes me start thinking like Sorokin. I continue to be repulsed by its heavy vitalism. Cars with huge sound systems pulsate so powerfully the sound waves can be felt blocks away. Students put tiny speakers into their ears but you can still hear the reverberations. The music is loud and energetic, heavily sexual. Hip-hop and rap emphasize heavy rhythm with a faintly threatening effect. Their lyrics are raw and vulgar. The last thing one could say about their form and content is that they are beautiful. It is difficult to believe that young people weaned on such music will ever be able to appreciate more subtle and delicate forms. One could formulate a theorem that as our sound equipment has gotten better and better, popular music has gotten worse and worse.

Certainly the popular music that I grew up with is attractive to me not so much because of its quality but because of its nostalgic associations. Most of it was flotsam and jetsam, rightly consigned to oblivion. But some of it had higher aesthetic qualities, say the vocal performances of Frank Sinatra, the jazz of Brubeck or Stan Kenton, or some of the Broadway pieces of that time. The best of the popular music had a measure of delicacy, romance, and subtlety about it. Lyrics were clever, sometimes even sophisticated. The music was attractive, maybe even lovely.

One of the marks of a sensate culture is its unwillingness to make qualitative judgments about such things as music or art beyond their technical characteristics and/or performance. Since music and art are to be judged by the sensations they excite in the brains of the listener or viewer, such qualitative judgments are impossible to make. Beauty is indeed in the ears and eyes of the receiver of the signals.

In a recent conversation with a music professor who had just taken to teaching popular music in his classes, I asked if there were not some sort of hierarchy in music. I wondered whether he was teaching students to appreciate what I believe to be higher forms of music—that of Beethoven, Mozart, Bach. It has always seemed to me that such music has a beauty and seriousness that rise far beyond what popular music can convey. At its best it opens the door to transcendent beauty; it brings forth ecstasy in the hearer. The great conductor Georg Solti once said that the best proof for the existence of God was the appearance of Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart in human history. By that remark I take he meant that Mozart’s music was so stunningly beautiful that it transported you to spiritual realm. It gives the hearer an encounter with transcendence.

My professor colleague would have none of my argument. A high-brow himself, he would only allow that the piano compositions of Bach had more technical complexity than most popular music. I could report similar conversations with those in the art history department, where beauty is no longer a useable word. Thus, it seems to me that the elite world has followed the popular world in reducing everything to the sensory perceptions of the hearer or viewer. Only we call this post-modernism. In this world there is no transcendent point of reference to make judgments about truth, beauty, or goodness.

Speaking of goodness, many developments in the contemporary moral world make me think like Sorokin. Let’s take, for example, the radical ethical utilitarianism of Peter Singer, who holds an endowed chair at that old Presbyterian institution, Princeton University. While many of his arguments still horrify those who hear or read them, we are inching closer to a Singerian world.

Singer argues that all living beings have similar sensory perceptions and therefore there is really no qualitative difference between humans and animals. A terribly deformed human baby has less claim to life than a fully functioning pig because the latter can experience far more pleasure than the former. Likewise, human parents should have a year’s time to consider whether they really want an imperfect baby they may have brought forth. They should be able to refuse the life of that baby because it would be too much of a burden—too much pain—for them or for the baby. Singer has also put forward arguments for bestiality as long as it does not inflict pain on the unsuspecting animal. He believes that the taboo against bestiality is one of the last vestiges of the Judeo-Christian insistence on a hierarchy of being in which humans are not to engage in sex with lower beings. He would like to see it struck down.

The animal rights movement—at least in its more radical fringes—exhibits not only the elevation of the right for animals to enjoy pleasure over pain, but the reduction of humans to the level of animals. An adjunct philosophy professor I once hired for my department was a militant atheist and animal rights proponent. She raised pure-bred horses as an avocation. After an unlikely conversion to Christianity, she told me that one of the things she noticed after her conversion was that she could more easily “put down” an ailing animal. It no longer was like putting an equal being to death.

Sorokin would predict this leveling as an upshot of sensate culture, which wants to rid itself of religious notions of human nature and destiny. Judaism and Christianity both affirm that humans are created in the image of God, and therefore of incomparable worth. This affirmation, of course, is not verifiable on empirical grounds, or on utilitarian grounds. Rather, it is grounded in the will of God that is revealed in the Holy Scriptures. This worth may even be affirmed in idealistic Enlightenment notions of the high respect for the rational agent, but that is but an echo of its earlier ideational formulation. Judaism and Christianity both have strong deontological elements that claim intrinsic value for all human beings and intrinsic rightness for actions which conform to the will of God.

Such deontological affirmations are under severe pressure from the utilitarian movement of sensate culture in Western cultures. Whether it is the new openness to experimenting with human embryos in stem cell research, the “production” of babies by surrogacy, the reduction of marriage from a covenanted, life-long, “one-flesh” union to a contractual agreement between whatever partners, the moral de-regulation of sex, the resolute separation of law from religiously-based morality, or the effort to expunge religious values from the public sphere, all seem to indicate a flight from the transcendent norms—ideationally based—that have guided Western culture for so long. A growing segment of society, the “engaged progressives,” as the University of Virginia Family Cultures Study calls them, is characterized by its firm rejection of transcendent norms.

Sorokin was certain that the chaos and decadence of the sensate phase would soon give way to a new birth of ideational culture. I am not so sure. We could putter along this way for a long time, pursuing the “Kleinigkeiten” of sensate existence at the expense of real aspiration or adventure. But the human spirit is irrepressible and there will be rebellions against such a reduction of humanity. Some of those rebellions could be nasty indeed, as are the Islamic reactions against the sensate elements of Western culture. On the other hand, the vigor of some religious subcultures in America is far from depleted. They carry a strong conviction that God’s guidance surpasses that of the promptings of the senses, and, if they live up to their convictions, may provide wholesome models for a decaying civilization.

Robert Benne, Jordan-Trexler Professor of Religion Emeritus, Research Associate, and Founder of the Robert Benne Center for Religion and Society at Roanoke College, Salem, Virginia

Uncategorized

Previous Post

February 10, 2015

New research shows kids with gay parents fare worse

Next Post

February 20, 2015 New offer from first-ever Christian Zionism conference

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month March 2023 November 2022 October 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 November 2021 October 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 July 2020 June 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 August 2019 July 2019 May 2019 April 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz