Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

The Northampton Seminar

Are Muslim and Christian histories morally equivalent?

Last updated on: February 7, 2015 at 4:17 pm   by Gerald McDermott

Are Muslim and Christian histories morally equivalent? 2015-02-07T16:17:55-04:00 Gerald McDermott

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

President Obama seems to think so.

At the National Prayer Breakfast a few days ago he said, “Unless we get on our high horse and think that this is unique to some other place, remember that during the Crusades and Inquisition, people committed terrible deeds in the name of Christ. In our home country, slavery and Jim Crow all too often was justified in the name of Christ.”

Was he right?

Well, the founders of the two religions were quite different when it came to committing “terrible deeds.”

Muhammad was a religious leader who also served as soldier and magistrate. His biographer Ibn Ishaq says he fought in twenty-seven battles. He ordered the death of forty-three opponents, including several opponents who criticized him in verse. After a Jewish tribe was found to be planning with the Meccans a rear attack on the Muslims, Muhammad’s men attacked the Jews. When the tribe surrendered, between 600 and 900 men were beheaded, and the women and children were sold as slaves.  Muhammad apparently signed off on these beheadings and sales into slavery.

In contrast, Jesus refused to lead an army or head a party to resist those who were trying to destroy him. He told Peter not to fight his arrest.

Of course Obama was talking about followers of Jesus and Muhammad, not the founders themselves.  Yet even if we focus on followers, there is a difference in chronology.  Today there are no Christian groups beheading and crucifying and enslaving thousands.  In fact, there are no Christian groups doing any of these things.  That is a huge difference.

And Christians today universally denounce slavery, killing unbelievers just because they are unbelievers, crucifying anyone, and racial segregation.  Yet there are large Muslim groups that endorse almost all, perhaps all, of these things.  Not that all Muslims do, of course.  But far too many groups of Muslims, and far too many Muslims.

That is a second difference.

Obama might say that Christianity has had the advantage of going through the Enlightenment, and Islam has not.

Precisely.  The Enlightenment has helped Christianity to condemn the Inquisition and the worst aspects of the Crusades (they were not entirely bad, for they were in large part defensive wars to help rescue Eastern Christians who were pleading for deliverance of their lands after conquest by Muslims).

Even apart from the Enlightenment, Christianity’s own prophetic and moral teachings have fostered self-correction all along.  Its first theologian Paul denounced racial segregation (“in Christ there is neither Jew nor Greek”) and suggested to Philemon that slavery is unworthy of a disciple of Jesus.  Christian leaders denounced slavery, racial discrimination, and murder throughout the history of the faith.

The fact remains that Christianity has gone through a huge self-correction on these things, and Islam has not.  One is hopefully beginning in Islam, but it is a slow beginning.  That is a third difference.

We must recognize that there are millions of moderate Muslims who want a Reformation in Islam.  They denounce beheadings, slavery, crucifixion, forced child marriages, death for changing religions, etc.

But there are millions of Muslims who support these things.  That is a fourth difference.

Bottom line, our president was suggesting a moral equivalence that does not exist.

Uncategorized

Previous Post



February 6, 2015

Why transgender does not make sense

Next Post



February 8, 2015 Surprising and helpful reflections from a chaste Catholic lesbian


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month March 2023 November 2022 October 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 November 2021 October 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 July 2020 June 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 August 2019 July 2019 May 2019 April 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What is Jesus' most famous sermon called?

Select your answer to see how you score.

The Sermon on the Mount The Last Supper The Beatitudes The Parable of the Sower

Related posts from The Northampton Seminar

Evangelical

Jesus and Jewish law

The Northampton Seminar

Evangelical

Interview on what difference Jesus' Jewishness makes and...

The Northampton Seminar

Evangelical

News from Israel--the election and Messianic Jews

The Northampton Seminar

Evangelical

The third rail in conservative churches

The Northampton Seminar

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Evangelical

The REST of Your Life: A Creative Wrestles...

This week I had a conversation with a good friend from church....

How the author of the world's best hymn...

I've been working with John Newton for a while now. This makes...

Psalm 130 | Lectio Divina

Long before this Lectio Divina, Psalm 130 - the song - started...

What About the Trees? Another Living Parable

After I finished writing the last article about falling leaves as a...

Why Classical Education Is a Conversation, Not a...

Come and Read: Joy in Classical Education When I was a little...

What Happened at Cornell?

Cornell University has received a great deal of negative publicity and intense...

view all Evangelical blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube