Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

The Northampton Seminar

The Fall-out of the Sexual Revolution

Last updated on: January 8, 2015 at 11:55 am   by Guest Contributor

The Fall-out of the Sexual Revolution 2015-01-08T11:55:14-04:00 Guest Contributor

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Robert Benne

It is educated people (our elites) who press forward the sexual revolution. They are ones who produce the entertainment and do the advertising. They are creators and supporters of internet pornography. They are the ones—many in academia—who themselves live fairly conventional lives but would not be caught dead defending the institution of marriage. The negative effects of their actions or lack thereof are borne by those below them on the social class ladder, leading one commentator to characterize their action as “class warfare.”

As a society we seem bent on sexualizing everything. Nearly every movie or TV series for adults features a good deal of sexual insinuations, talk, and action. Advertising uses sex to sell: one fast-food chain sells gargantuan hamburgers by pandering to the vices of gluttony and lust. Women’s chic clothing is provocative; even small girls are dressed up as sirens. Football games are adorned by scantily clad “cheerleaders” whose gyrations are pretty transparent. Erectile dysfunction ads run during family time on TV. College kids engage in “hooking up,” wherein the point is to have as much sex as possible without any personal commitment or memory. Above all, the internet is awash with pornography, available anonymously to anyone who wishes to view it. No perversity or degradation goes un-videoed.

All this is the fruit of the sexual liberation movement that moves like a tsunami in America life. The guiding principle is that everyone ought to be free to—and have the right to—express their sexual desires in any fashion whatever as long as there is consent. When consent is absent, however, judgment and punishment rain down on the hapless perpetrator without mercy or end. Lives can be ruined for those who are forced into non-consensual sex (child pornography and sexual assault) or who perpetrate it or are charged falsely with it.

Everything hangs on that crucial element of consent. But when the culture exhorts and excites everyone to engage in sex, it seems grossly naïve to believe that many people—mostly men—will not act upon their desires without regard to that weak reed of consent. Relying on consent in the face of such magnified desire is like the Dutch boy holding his finger in a hole in the dike in the midst of a flood.

A wiser society channeled sexual desire into constructive ends.  It connected sex with commitment. It did not optimistically believe that sex unfettered by institutional guidance was harmless.   Indeed, one of the main purposes of marriage was to protect society from sexual disorder and violence. Marriage, of course, was the social institution par excellence that incorporated sex into a permanent faithful union between a man and a woman.   Both woman and man gave up their sexual wanderings for the sake of an exclusive kind of love. It was in that context that children were best born and reared. The institution was shored up by law and by a religious culture that elevated marriage—and the sex within it—to a Sacrament or a Holy Covenant. Marriage and the natural family became the building blocks of a good society.

But the marriage culture has been badly damaged by the sexual revolution. Ironically, however, it has not been as damaging to the college-educated classes as it has been to poorer classes and minorities. Educated people generally marry before they have children. They usually stay married and aim at a wholesome family life, supported by a decent income. They have resources—human and material—to cushion any mishaps.

Poor and working class people, no longer shored up by the institution and culture of marriage, often lead precisely the disordered and sometimes violent lives that the older defenders of marriage feared. They tend not to marry but have children anyway, often passed around to various persons who are move in and out of unstable family life. Young mothers often wind up alone, faced with daunting responsibilities. Unsurprisingly, the children of such families have sharply diminished life chances.

However, it is educated people (our elites) who press forward the sexual revolution. They are ones who produce the entertainment and do the advertising. They are creators and supporters of internet pornography. They are the ones—many in academia—who themselves live fairly conventional lives but would not be caught dead defending the institution of marriage. The negative effects of their actions or lack thereof are borne by those below them on the social class ladder, leading one commentator to characterize their action as “class warfare.”

Fittingly, colleges and universities are caught in the tension between unfettered desire and the need for consent, leading the federal government, of all people, to propose—or impose?—a whole battery of rules to govern sexual relations on campus. Women, who were supposed to be the same sort of sexual beings as men, are being surrounded by a chastity belt of rules that demand consent so primly that the whole system makes the Victorian age look permissive. The male who violates them—or is charged with violating them—is considered guilty until proven innocent.

Let’s hope the older marriage culture—now of a more equalitarian hew—will again arise to rescue a decaying culture. Sex really does need the guidance of a wholesome ethic. Consent is certainly necessary but not enough.

 

 

 

 

 

Uncategorized

Previous Post



December 6, 2014

Why Millennials Long for Liturgy

Next Post



December 10, 2014 Seven Things I Wish My Pastor Knew About My Homosexuality


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month March 2023 November 2022 October 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 November 2021 October 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 July 2020 June 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 August 2019 July 2019 May 2019 April 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who tricked Jacob into marrying Leah instead of Rachel?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Joseph Reuben Laban Esau

Related posts from The Northampton Seminar

Evangelical

Jesus and Jewish law

The Northampton Seminar

Evangelical

Interview on what difference Jesus' Jewishness makes and...

The Northampton Seminar

Evangelical

News from Israel--the election and Messianic Jews

The Northampton Seminar

Evangelical

The third rail in conservative churches

The Northampton Seminar

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Evangelical

Creation as Secondary to Judgment

Creating is a most human act. A good canonical (classical) education will...

The REST of Your Life: A Creative Wrestles...

This week I had a conversation with a good friend from church....

How the author of the world's best hymn...

I've been working with John Newton for a while now. This makes...

Psalm 130 | Lectio Divina

Long before this Lectio Divina, Psalm 130 - the song - started...

What About the Trees? Another Living Parable

After I finished writing the last article about falling leaves as a...

Why Classical Education Is a Conversation, Not a...

Come and Read: Joy in Classical Education When I was a little...

view all Evangelical blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube