David Gushee’s embrace of gay marriage

Last updated on: January 8, 2015 at 11:55 am by Gerald McDermott

David Gushee’s embrace of gay marriage 2015-01-08T11:55:20-04:00 Gerald McDermott

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Much is being made of evangelical ethicist David Gushee’s announcement that he now thinks same-sex practice can be as Christian as married heterosexual sex. Jonathan Merritt celebrates it at Religious News Service, where Gushee is said to lament, “I am truly sorry that it took me so long to come into full solidarity with the Church’s own most oppressed group.”

Really? The Church’s most oppressed group?

I don’t mean to dismiss the real suffering of gays and lesbians, who undoubtedly suffer because of their disordered desires. It has wreaked havoc emotionally and physically, and many, perhaps most, have suffered rejection from family and friends because of it.

But in terms of numbers, they are fewer than the millions of babies aborted each year all over the world. Abortion caused many, perhaps most, of them pain as their lives were being snuffed out. And many of us would say the aborted are members of Christ’s church.

And what about the millions of Christians who are suffering for their faith today–hiding and running from ISIS, the North Korean regime, Boko Haram, and numerous radical Muslim groups and governments? Some are being tortured, others killed in hideous ways.

I was struck by the lack of biblical argument by Gushee in articles I read. But that was probably the fault of the articles, I surmised, not Gushee.

Yet then I read Robert Gagnon’s commentary on Gushee’s announcement. Gagnon is perhaps the most learned scholar in the world on the Bible and same sex practice. His book, The Bible and Homosexual Practice, is the go-to book on the subject, even for scholarly supporters of gay marriage.

Gagnon reports that several times he suggested to Gushee by private email that Gushee read short articles which Gagnon had written on biblical passages that are critical to Gushee’s position. Gagnon says Gushee seems not to have read them, explaining that he did not have time to read everything in a variety of languages. But Gagnon was not asking for that.

Gushee continues to say that the apostle was writing only about exploitative relationships, not same-sex physical relations in general. This is a familiar interpretation made by revisionists that is unsupportable. In Romans 1, for example, Paul says “women exchanged natural relations for those that are contrary to nature, and the men likewise gave up natural relations with women and were consumed with passion for one another” (1.26-26).

The emphasis is on the act of same-sex relations, not the motivations for it. There is no mention of age or psychological dynamics. Only the act, and the act is called para phusin, contrary to nature.

Bottom line: there is nothing new here. Gushee has not discovered something no one else has seen. He is repeating old mantras of previous revisionists, whose arguments have not succeeded in New Testament scholarship.

Perhaps the fact that his sister is a lesbian has something to do with his public change of position–which I had suspected he had made some years ago privately, based on his book with Glen Stassen.

As Walter Wink (a proponent of gay marriage) wrote in effect some years ago in the Christian Century, “We revisionists must be intellectually honest. We cannot make an exegetical case for same-sex practice. The texts do not allow it. We must make a theological case instead.”

Why a theological and not exegetical case? Because the Bible is clearly against same-sex practice, in both Testaments. Only ignorance or inattention can claim otherwise.

“I am truly sorry that it took me so long to come into full solidarity with the Church’s own most oppressed group.” – See more at: http://jonathanmerritt.religionnews.com/2014/10/24/david-gushee-lgbt-homosexuality-matters/#sthash.iNi6RX4k.dpuf

Uncategorized

Previous Post

October 30, 2014

No, grammar doesn't cause sexism

Next Post

November 1, 2014 ISIS Snuffs Out Ancient Christianity

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month March 2023 November 2022 October 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 November 2021 October 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 July 2020 June 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 August 2019 July 2019 May 2019 April 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz