So is ISIS a species of Islam or not?

Last updated on: January 8, 2015 at 11:55 am by Gerald McDermott

So is ISIS a species of Islam or not? 2015-01-08T11:55:24-04:00 Gerald McDermott

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The New York Times reported yesterday that several American Islamic associations refuse to refer to ISIS—which stands for Islamic State in Iraq and Syria–as Islamic.

President Obama is now widely quoted as saying last month that “ISIL is not Islamic.”

Even Al Qaeda has taken recently to denouncing ISIS for seizing innocent aid workers. Unstated implication—“they are not truly Islamic.”

One of the most common rationales for these denunciations is that Islam is a religion of peace. Last month UK PM David Cameron said, “Islam is a religion of peace.” His predecessor Tony Blair said “there is no doubt about [Islam’s] true and peaceful nature.” President Obama has said as much.

But is this true? That Islam is a religion of peace?

If we go to the Qur’an we do indeed find statements of a pacific nature. “Fight in the way of God against those who fight against you, but begin not hostilities. Lo! God loveth not aggressors . . . . There is no compulsion in religion. . . . If anyone slew a person—unless it be for murder or for spreading mischief in the land—It would be as if he slew the whole people” (2:190; 2:256; 5;32).

At the same time, the Qur’an commands its readers to “slay the Pagans wherever you find them” (9.5), and to “behead the unbelievers [the Meccans who do not accept Islam] and cut off their fingertips” (8:12).

According to traditional Muslim commentary, the Pagans had betrayed a treaty with Muhammad, and the Meccans were on their way home from Palestine with a caravan. But readers without this commentary could interpret these commands as applicable to any non-Muslims at any time. The text of the Qur’an itself does not make the context clear.

But then doesn’t the Bible also contain exhortations to violence?

It does. God told the prophet Samuel to order the destruction of all the Amalekites, “both man and woman, child and infant” (1 Sam 15:3).

Yet there are important differences between Islam and Christianity on violence, when it comes to the texts and the founders.

First, the texts. In the Bible the reader sees that the call to kill is in a story of something that happened thousands of years ago. Readers don’t get the impression they are told to kill now. In fact, when they come to the New Testament, authority to kill is given to the state (Romans 13) not the church.

But in the Qur’an there are very few developed stories, and the commands to kill are interspersed throughout the text, most of the time on their own, apart from stories, with no sense of context.

So it is much easier for a reader of the Qur’an to get the impression that he should take this command–to slay the unbeliever–to heart today. This is why it is easier for terrorists who read the Qur’an to think they are doing God’s will than for would-be terrorists who read the Bible. It may also be at least one important reason why—while most Muslims are not terrorists—most terrorists are Muslims.

While traditionalist Islam for centuries condemned the Kharijites, a sect of Muslims that encouraged seeking martyrdom by attacking supposed heretics and unbelievers, in the last century the Muslim Brotherhood has encouraged suicide bombing and other kinds of militant jihad by using these and other texts in the Qur’an for support.

A second difference is the matter of founders. Muhammad, the founder of what has come to be known as Islam, was not only a religious leader but also a military commander. He served as soldier and magistrate. His biographer Ibn Ishaq says he fought in twenty-seven battles. He ordered the death of forty-three opponents, including several opponents who criticized him in verse. After a Jewish tribe was found to be planning with the Meccans a rear attack on the Muslims, Muhammad’s men attacked the Jews. When the tribe surrendered, between 600 and 900 men were beheaded, and the women and children were sold as slaves. Muhammad apparently signed off on these beheadings and sales.

In contrast, Jesus refused to lead an army or head a party to resist those who were trying to destroy him. He told Peter not to fight his arrest.

Two more relevant points. “Islam” means not “peace” but “surrender.” And “peace” for the Islamic tradition does not mean the cessation of war but the final result when all the world shall have submitted to the Prophet.

All this is not to say, however, that most Muslims are terrorists or support terrorism. Most want to raise their children in peace and provide a good future for them. Many, like UCLA law professor Khaled Abou El Fadl, condemn terrorism. El Fadl calls for a “pluralistic, tolerant, and nonviolent Islam.” He receives death threats for criticizing those he calls “puritans” and their narrow reading of the Qur’an—privileging the jihad verses over those that call for mercy and moderation.

So is ISIS an Islamic group? Well, think of the Inquisition. It perpetrated dastardly deeds, including torture and murder, upon those who did not conform to its version of true religion. Its leaders were self-described Christians, and probably did what they did for a mixture of reasons, both self-interested and theological. We would say that they were bad Christians, implementing a terrible version of Christianity. But most of us would concede it was a noxious kind of . . . Christianity.

So too, I think, for ISIS. It is animated by people who think they are obeying Allah, following what they think the Qur’an and Hadith (books of the words and deeds of Muhammad) say. Most Muslims say it is not true Islam—just as Christians say the Inquisition was not true Christianity.

But if the Inquisition was a bad form of Christianity, then ISIS is a bad kind of . . . Islam.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

October 3, 2014

Surrogacy with happy endings--and what they hide

Next Post

October 4, 2014 Camille Paglia: The Modern Campus Cannot Comprehend Evil

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month March 2023 November 2022 October 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 November 2021 October 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 July 2020 June 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 August 2019 July 2019 May 2019 April 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz