Why It’s a Mistake to Cast the Pharisees as the “Klingons” of the New Testament

Last updated on: March 4, 2019 at 7:35 am by Josh Daffern

Why It’s a Mistake to Cast the Pharisees as the “Klingons” of the New Testament 2019-03-04T07:35:49-06:00 Josh Daffern

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Arthur Humeau

Growing up in church, the Pharisees have always been the bad guys of the New Testament, and it’s easy to assume that they were these evil, manipulative, diabolical agents of doom hell-bent on corrupting the world. They opposed Jesus so they must be evil, right? They were like the Klingons in the Star Trek universe, agents of evil with no redeeming qualities. And Christians would never be like Pharisees today, would we? I mean, we’re not evil! But when we began to humanize them, we can began to see an uncomfortable amount of ourselves in them, and if we’ve struggled with anything as evangelicals, it’s been our tendency to be a little Pharisaical in our approach to Christianity. So, let’s find out a little more about our favorite villains in the New Testament.

The origin of the Pharisees starts around 160 BC, which is 160 years before Jesus of Nazareth was born. Rome had not risen yet to conquer the world, but Alexander the Great of Greece had conquered the Western world and after his death his empire got carved up into four kingdoms. Israel was situated between two of them and they became pawns in the greater geopolitics of the day. During that time there was a famous Jewish revolt led by the Maccabees that briefly gave Israel independence from the world powers. That didn’t last long, and within a few years they were back under the thumb of foreign powers. That’s when the two parties we see in New Testament (Pharisees and Sadducees) began to arise.

The Sadducees were centered in Jerusalem, they controlled the temple, and they had a more liberal interpretation of Jewish law. Basically, if Moses didn’t expressly forbid something, then it was okay to do. Moses never expressly forbade cooperating with the Greeks or Egyptians or later the Romans, so they were willing partners with them. Many accused them of selling out, of comprising their Scriptures to justify their hold on power, of becoming too liberal. But the Sadducees kept their power and kept control of the temple.

The opposition rose from some champions of the people, from the working class, from the good ole small town conservative values that drove the majority of the Jews. This was the party of the Pharisees. They held a strong line against compromise and collaboration with the foreign powers. They saw through the blatant power and money grab of the Sadducees and wanted to stand up for the conservative values of the people and adherence to the Scriptures.

The Pharisees had a different approach to the Law, expanding it, commenting on it, applying it to current social situations and modernizing it for the people. Over time, this oral tradition, the interpretation by the Pharisees, became just as authoritative as the Law itself, and that’s where they ran into conflict with Jesus, not because Jesus was breaking the Old Testament Law, but because he was departing from their interpretation of it.

Instead of the temple in Jerusalem, the Pharisees organized the people in synagogues, smaller houses of worship all throughout the country where people could gather together and read Scripture together. When Jesus announced himself as the fulfillment of the Old Testament prophecies, he did so not in the temple but in a synagogue.

At the end of the day, they weren’t all bad guys. They started very well intentioned. They were champions of the people, they tried to bring the people back to obedience to the Scriptures, they tried to resist the growing secularization of their country by the Roman Empire. I think we might have identified with many of them and liked many of them.

So what’s the point in this history lesson? When we read of Jesus’ conflict with the Pharisees (especially in the Gospel of Matthew), we need to ensure that those Pharisaical tendencies don’t infect our hearts and our churches today.

Previous Post

March 1, 2019

3 Ways "Temple" Thinking Still Infects the Church Today

Next Post

March 6, 2019 If You Were at the Party at Matthew's House, Would You Be Inside Partying or Outside Judging?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Family Matters Ministry in the Trenches Morning Brew MTVpastor New Wineskins Top Menu Truth from Life Uncategorized Watch Sermons

Select a Month June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was the scribe and priest that led a second group back to Jerusalem?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Ezra Mordecai Zerubbabel Nehemiah