The Unintended Logical Consequences of Obama's Transgender Bathroom Directive

Last updated on: May 14, 2016 at 7:29 am by Josh Daffern

The Unintended Logical Consequences of Obama's Transgender Bathroom Directive 2016-05-14T07:29:11-06:00 Josh Daffern

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

www.wikipedia.com

This week the Obama administration created a furor in a letter to schools and universities clarifying the rights of transgender students and the use of public bathrooms. Now obviously for conservatives this brings up a whole host of moral and theological issues, which other bloggers have well documented. What I’d like to try and tackle are the logical fallacies and unintended consequences of the transgender bathroom directive.

In society today, we have few sacred documents. Contracts can be broken, a signature does not hold the weight of law, bankruptcy can help you avoid the debt you’ve amassed. Yet two documents have remained sacred: the birth certificate and death certificate. We can definitively say when someone was born and when someone dies. The information on those certificates has been regarded as irrefutable and immovable until last week.

With the letter from the Justice Department interpreting the law when it comes to transgender bathroom policies, it begins to erode the societal trust that we put in a birth certificate. Suddenly items (like gender) are open to interpretation. If a person’s internal gender identity changes from the one assigned to that person at birth, then the birth certificate is wrong. Your internal identification trumps all. This is the apex of moral relativism and has been the argument behind the transgender movement for years.

Now with the official White House blessing, the erosion of something as sacred as our birth certificate is accelerating. And here are the unintended consequences: there are many other vital records recorded on the birth certificate, which are now open to internal interpretation.

For instance, your date and time of birth are recorded on your birth certificate. But what if you begin to believe that your internal age is different than the age assigned to you? What if you’re 13 years old and want to purchase alcohol? Shouldn’t your internal age identification trump the age arbitrarily assigned to you on a piece of paper? What if you wish to have sex with someone below the age of consent? As long as their internal age is above the age of consent, you get the picture. What if you want to start collecting social security early? Simply advance your internal age identification and start collecting from the government. They wouldn’t discriminate against you because of something as arbitrary as the age on your birth certificate, would they?

Your race is also listed on a birth certificate, but what if that is arbitrarily assigned as well? Rachel Dolezal used this exact argument as a white woman to self-identify as black, even heading up a local chapter of the NAACP. She was publicly shamed for her attempt to circumvent her race as listed on her birth certificate. Yet if a birth certificate is open to interpretation, then she should be able to self-identify as anyone she wants to. When students are applying for college scholarships, they should have the right to self-identify as whatever race gets them the most scholarships, not the one arbitrarily assigned to them by their parents on their birth certificate.

Speaking of parents, they are also listed on the birth certificate. But what if a child is having a fight with their parents and begins to self-identify as someone else’s child? Sure that child can go through the lengthy court process to emancipate themselves, but shouldn’t switching parents be as simple as self-identifying with someone else? Why should children be forced to live and obey their parents simply because a piece of paper arbitrarily listed them as the biological parents?

These are just a few of the logical consequences of what may happen now that we’ve opened the door to interpret something as universally sacred as a birth certificate.

Thoughts?

Previous Post

May 9, 2016

6 Things I Learned From Going to Jail

Next Post

May 18, 2016 The Biggest Warning Church Leaders Should Take From This Presidential Election

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Family Matters Ministry in the Trenches Morning Brew MTVpastor New Wineskins Top Menu Truth from Life Uncategorized Watch Sermons

Select a Month June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What city's walls fell after the Israelites marched around them?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Jericho Bethel Jerusalem Ai