Andy Stanley vs Albert Mohler: Is Belief in All the Bible a Litmus Test for Salvation?

Last updated on: January 1, 2017 at 3:12 pm by Josh Daffern

Andy Stanley vs Albert Mohler: Is Belief in All the Bible a Litmus Test for Salvation? 2017-01-01T15:12:50-06:00 Josh Daffern

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

wikipedia.com

Stanley makes an argument that to many sounds like heresy, but I believe is a strong and needed pivot for the church today. Stanley made the argument to his church that at the center of our faith is a person (Jesus) and an event (the Resurrection). He affirms the inspiration of Scripture and validates their incredible importance, but he stops short of making belief in the infallibility of Scripture a litmus test for salvation. And I think on that note he’s right on.

I personally remember back in college a Bible professor posing a question that at the time itself seemed like heresy: Are we becoming guilty of bibliolatry? It seems heretical even to pose this question, but Stanley addresses the trend in the evangelical world to make belief in all the Scriptures as co-equal with belief in Jesus when it comes to requirements for salvation.

Evangelicals celebrate the protest of Martin Luther against the Catholic Church and his rightful interpretation of Romans when he declared that salvation was sola fide, through faith alone. The question for evangelicals today is what or who must our faith be in for salvation? Is faith in Christ enough, or must we also believe in the sanctity of the entire Scriptures, Old and New Testaments?

Is the Bible co-equal with Jesus? That’s a fine line to walk. The Scriptures are where we find the stories of Jesus, so it makes sense to put the two on equal footing, but the Bible itself never declares a full belief in the Scriptures as necessary for salvation. Only faith in Jesus will save you. But since all of our recordings of Jesus are found in Scripture, it’s easy to elevate the Bible to co-equal status with Jesus, which the Bible itself never claims to do, and when we do that we put a book in a place reserved only for the Son of God himself: the absolute center of our faith.

So in this fight, I easily pick Andy Stanley. I believe in the sanctity of Scripture. I believe and hold that all Scripture is infallible. The infallibility of Scripture is not the issue here. The issue raised by Stanley was the phenomenon of people walking away from Christianity because they had doubts about some of its stories, and the assumption today is that a full belief in the infallibility of Scripture is a litmus test for salvation. Stanley correctly refutes that argument and actually goes on to present one of the clearest and most convincing arguments for the historical validity of the New Testament writings.

But for Mohler, that’s not enough. He is president of an institution dedicated to (among other things) teaching the Bible, so an attack on any part of that book or its position within Christianity must be met with violent force. But I believe his article misses the point entirely and actually proves Stanley’s point. Stanley’s arguments might sound like heresy to the already convinced, but that’s not his audience. His target audience isn’t Christians, but non-Christians. Andy Stanley, much like the Apostle Paul in Acts 17 at Mars Hill, is engaging with skeptics about the claims of Christianity. He presented a convincing and well researched argument about the only claim of Christianity that is necessary for salvation: belief in Jesus and his resurrection from the dead. As heretical as it might sound (but it is not), belief in the infallibility of all of Scripture is not a litmus test for salvation. Belief in Jesus is all that is required for salvation, and even the Bible says that.

Mohler’s counter-punch to Stanley, as well-written and linguistically high-minded as it is, misses because he’s trying to counter an argument that Stanley isn’t making. Here’s the central issue: What’s at the very center of Christianity? What is necessary for salvation? Is belief in Jesus enough? Or is belief in all the Bible necessary as well? To many, belief in the infallibility of Scripture has become a litmus test for salvation, and that’s the heresy.

Previous Post

September 26, 2016

5 Things I Learned From Researching 500 of the Best Sermons Out There Today

Next Post

October 3, 2016 Does a Person Have to Believe Noah's Ark Really Happened to Be Saved?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Family Matters Ministry in the Trenches Morning Brew MTVpastor New Wineskins Top Menu Truth from Life Uncategorized Watch Sermons

Select a Month June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which prophet often wept over the sins and fate of Jerusalem?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Jeremiah Ezekiel Isaiah Habakkuk