Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

nakedpastor

Flying Overweight

Last updated on: April 20, 2009 at 1:34 pm   by David Hayward

Flying Overweight 2009-04-20T13:34:19-04:00 David Hayward

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

thumb463x_freud3I wasn’t shocked, but I was a little bewildered by the news this morning that United Airlines is going to charge overweight people double for their tickets. Here’s the guideline:

Under the rules outlined by United, passengers who are unable to fit into a single seat in the ticketed cabin; are unable to properly buckle the seatbelt using a single seatbelt extender; and/or are unable to put the seat’s armrests down when seated will be denied boarding unless they purchase an extra seat.

Apparently Americans have grown approximately 25 pounds since the 1960’s. Seat designs of today are basically the same as the 60’s. Many argue that the problem isn’t the size of the passenger but the size of the seat. I agree. Even though I’m pretty much where I “should” be weight-wise, I am over six feet tall and I never have enough room on a plane. My knees inevitably are shoved into the seat in front of me even before it is reclined! I have to spread my legs and sprawl into the space of my neighbors. Even my 35 inch arms have difficulty finding a place to rest. We are bigger. We are taller. We can discuss all the medical ethics involved because obesity increases health care and medical expenses, etc. But I want to talk about something else.

Our idea of what a body should look like is changing. This is not news. Look at artistic nudes down through the centuries and the body shapes are amazingly diverse. Even culturally, what is regarded as a beautiful body varies greatly. We know what the west believes is a beautiful body. Just look at the covers of our magazines or the stars of our movies. But it is more than just appearances. Now, health is associated with weight. So now, not only is what we consider beautiful pleasant to the eye, but necessary for health.

Let’s take, for example, Angelina Jolie. I choose her not because I personally think she is the hottest, but because apparently she is the conglomeration of all that is believed to be visibly perfect in a woman. She is considered by some of my friends, male and female, to be the pinnacle of what feminine beauty looks like. Then, let’s say that her figure is what the pinnacle of feminine health looks like. If a woman worked out as hard as she does for hours a day with a personal trainer and ate as she does, etc., then a woman would attain to roughly that kind of physical health and beauty. So now you have what is considered beautiful, plus what is considered healthy, and the two meld together. Soon, based on what I perceive is happening in such incidents as United Airline’s announcement, health and therefore ultimately beauty will be legislated.

We are becoming more and more tyrannical. It is the tyranny of health and beauty. It is the tyranny of consensus. It is the tyranny of popular. It is the tyranny of homogeneity. It is the tyranny of opinion substantiated by science. Science proves that a healthy body looks like so, and what happens to be so is what is already considered by popular opinion to be beautiful. Overweight people will be increasingly marginalized, ridiculed and finally persecuted. Same with those considered ugly. The whole Susan Boyle incident should embarrass us back to some kind of philosophical restructuring of our values, should it not? An ugly person with a voice? A miracle! She’s a freak, not only because she’s ugly, but because she’s ugly AND she can sing!

There must be communities that live contrary to this tyranny. We must protest against this by encouraging, nurturing and applauding diversity in every facet of human life and expression.

The painting is Lucian Freud’s “Benefits Supervisor Sleeping” that sold last year for $33 million… the highest fetched for any living artist.

Check out my tees HERE. I’m growing my inventory all the time. And check out my art HERE.

art

thought

angelina_jolie

art

beauty

david_hayward

haywardart

health

lucien_freud

nakedpastor

overweight

painting

Previous Post



April 20, 2009

cartoon: caution... children at play sign

Next Post



April 21, 2009 cartoon: fire alarm


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category art cartoons cartoons 2 freebie music one minute message podcast Sophia teaching technology thought

Select a Month February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 March 2006 February 2006


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

True or False: Peter raised Tabitha (Dorcas) from the dead in Lydda.

Select your answer to see how you score.

TRUE FALSE

Related posts from nakedpastor

Progressive Christian

nakedpastor's goodbye video to patheos

nakedpastor

Progressive Christian

Jesus hearts nakedpastor so much he is helping...

nakedpastor

Progressive Christian

important announcement: nakedpastor is moving!

nakedpastor

Progressive Christian

Uganda sending gays to jail: who are the...

nakedpastor

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Progressive Christian

Why Christians Have a Sacred Duty to Vote:...

The Bible offers strong support for the sacred duty to vote. Here...

What Being a Modern-Day Apostle Means to Me

In my last column, I discussed the ins and outs of modern-day...

Did Ancient China Once Worship the God of...

Across human history, a common thread weaves through the origins of the...

Love Your Neighbor – Including Earth-Kin: Lev. 19,...

God’s command to love your neighbor means acting in an ethical and...

Lead a Church Study of “Jesus and Lao...

Guest writer Jack Thomas (The Irreverent Reverend) reflects on leading his church...

Principles for Understanding the Apostolic Ministry Today

Whenever people discover that my formal ministry title is "apostle," as in...

view all Progressive Christian blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube