Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Catholic
With My Body, I Thee Worship: Part One

With My Body, I Thee Worship: Part One

Last updated on: December 18, 2021 at 12:24 am by Gabriel Blanchard

With My Body, I Thee Worship: Part One 2021-12-18T00:24:57-04:00 Gabriel Blanchard

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Peter, Gate My Sheep

Last week, the Diocese of Marquette brought out a new policy on the pastoral care of gay and trans people. It made something of a splash on Twitter, partly because it’s extraordinarily restrictive, especially for the latter. Some dioceses don’t allow trans people to serve in Catholic schools or ministries, but this is the first time I’ve heard of a bishop directing his priests to refuse baptism to someone for being trans:

A person who publicly identifies as a different gender than his or her biological sex or has attempted “gender transitioning” may not be Baptized, Confirmed, or received into full communion in the Church, unless the person has repented. Repentance does not require reversing the physical changes to the body that the person has undergone. The experience of incongruence in one’s sexual identity is not sinful if it does not arise from the person’s free will … However, deliberate, freely chosen and manifest behaviors to redefine one’s sex do constitute … an obstacle.

Considering that baptism is, on the Catholic view, normally necessary to go to heaven,1 this kind of policy is a big deal! But to talk about it, we need to talk about the Catholic theology of gender, which is …

The Catholic Theology of Gender

… not completely clear, to be honest?

This isn’t to say the Church has said nothing about gender throughout her history. That’s obviously false—her teachings about sex and marriage presuppose the existence of male and female. As, if you think about it for a moment, does the idea of being transgender: if the sex of the body weren’t important to someone, it couldn’t make them uncomfortable. But I shouldn’t get sidetracked. I have, unsystematically, been trying to find an official Catholic stance on the metaphysics of gender for a few years now, and come up empty-handed. No council or encyclical has (to my knowledge) defined Church teaching on the subject; the Catechism maybe alludes to it, in just one paragraph; I’ve read Theology of the Body, and St. John Paul II never even explicitly discusses homosexuality, let alone trans identities.

I have found plenty of statements like the Marquette document, past and present. However, I’m not clear on the exact authority documents like this possess. Something like, say, the Pope directing a revision to the Catechism is obviously highly authoritative; one bishop stating an opinion, or even publishing a set of pastoral guidelines, is in a much greyer area.2 If what we’re talking about here is a theological opinion—something based on dogma, but not dogma—then withholding the sacraments, particularly baptism, is a really extreme measure against something that might not even be a sin in the first place.

The Unicorn in the Room

I wouldn’t feel right about proceeding with this series without making a few clear statements about myself first, though.

First of all, I’m not an ideal spokesman for the trans community. I do identify as non-binary, so I’m sort of “technically trans,” if you like? But:

My gender dysphoria is (a) pretty mild and (b) often fluctuates, so I don’t have any plans to transition medically—or even socially, beyond trying out he/they pronouns for a while. All that makes my experience pretty different from that of most trans people.
A lot of trans people would, to put it mildly, disagree with my acceptance of Catholic teaching about sexual morality, and be suspicious of my ideas about gender accordingly.
If the Church does define her theology of gender, I’m committed to accepting that, whatever it is. That kinda puts me on the hook to accept things I might dislike, but which are far costlier for most other trans people than they are for me.
I’m only one guy. I haven’t even read a ton of stuff by trans people or about gender theory. (Basically I’ve watched a lot of ContraPoints videos.) I think I do a reasonably good job of distinguishing between stuff I’m well-informed about and stuff where I’m unsure; but even with those caveats, I should not be your only source of information about this stuff!

Second, what the shit, I’m non-binary!? What does that even mean?

Now, not everyone uses the term in exactly the same way. For me, it means that while I don’t want to be a woman, there are certain things about my body I do wish were different. And I’m not going to go into full details, because it’s private. No one owes strangers a description of any of their funky bits, actual or ideal.3 I’m also not ready to say what I myself think about my identity, philosophically. I’ve heard a few different explanations of what gender metaphysically is, and while some of them hung together okay, none of them seemed obviously, definitely right.

“Gender Ideology”

Hang on. How is “There are two sexes, and your gender is the sex of your body” not obviously and definitely right? Am I about to start saying your gender is whatever you decide it is? Even as accepting and pastoral a Pope as Francis has warned about the dangers of gender ideology, and I’ve gone on and on about how opponents of his like Burke and Viganò should just shut up and accept his teaching. Is this “ultramontanism for thee, liberalism for me”? “The Vatican is infallible when it says stuff I like, and when it says stuff I don’t like, it’s being unclear”?

No. As I said above, if and when the Church dogmatically defines gender, I’m on board, full stop. I accept the Church’s authority to teach as divine. But I am going to ask, “Has the Church actually defined X?” before uncritically accepting X. And I’m not going to accept that casual remarks made in passing, or pastoral guidelines designed by and for a single diocese, meet that standard.

So back to the initial question from two paragraphs ago. Isn’t “God created us male and female, deal with it” just obviously true? The answer is, in fact, no; and the reason why isn’t gender ideology, or being “trapped in the wrong body,” or anything like that. The reason, surprisingly, lies in the body itself.

We need to talk about Money.

Go here for Part Two.

1The word “normally” is doing a lot of work here. The Church does believe that God is perfectly capable of saving people without baptism; it is the ordinary means, the way food is the ordinary means of staying alive. You can stay alive without food (e.g. with an IV drip), and likewise God can save people without baptism. But it’s still true to say “If you refuse to eat, that will make you die,” and baptism is (according to the Church) still spiritually necessary in the same sense.

2I don’t mean that the ordinary Magisterium has no force; among other things, I’d be approaching this document a lot more delicately if I were under this bishop’s authority. But the mere fact that a bishop says something, even in the discharge of his pastoral office, doesn’t mean he is necessarily correct. The bishops of England in 1534 nearly all signed the Act of Supremacy, for instance.

3To the people saying “I don’t want a description of your ‘funky bits’ anyway!”, that’s great. I sincerely hope that means that, when you find out someone is trans, you don’t start asking them questions like “Have you had THE SURGERY?”

Previous Post

December 10, 2021

Review: "Tenderness"

Next Post

December 18, 2021 With My Body, I Thee Worship: Part Two

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category abuse antifascism art bad Catholic celibacy chastity Church crucifixion culture war eros forgiveness gay gender homophobia ikons language liturgy peace poems politics Pope Francis prayer pro-life race recommendations reform repentance review sacraments saints satire scandal schism scripture sex suffering theology Uncategorized violence

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

True or False: Jacob deceived his father Isaac by pretending to be Esau to receive the blessing.

Select your answer to see how you score.

TRUE FALSE