Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

mudbloodcatholic

FASH 106: Glitterbomb

Last updated on: February 15, 2021 at 8:50 pm   by Gabriel Blanchard

FASH 106: Glitterbomb 2021-02-15T20:50:43-04:00 Gabriel Blanchard

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Caution: violent imagery and language.

Let’s review. We’ve discussed important misconceptions about fascism, sketched the ideology that drives it, and talked about some ways that fascists appeal to Catholic sensibilities. We’ve also dug into fascist ideas about race, and touched on the “white genocide” conspiracy theory. I hope it’s clear to any Catholic reader that fascism is deeply hostile to human dignity as such and to the gospel.

Ye are all the children of God by faith in Christ Jesus. For as many of you as have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ. There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus. And if ye be Christ’s, then are ye Abraham’s seed, and heirs according to the promise. —Galatians 3.26-29

But how does fascism operate? Despite its consistent ultranationalist mood, its methods are very diverse. Mussolini took power by force, but Hitler was elected. Fascist praxis is entirely pragmatic and situational. In particular, fascists are happy to adopt a lot of rhetoric from the Left; the very name “National Socialist” was a deliberate ruse (as the Night of the Long Knives would indicate, if their avowed hatred for Communists and trade unions didn’t). Still, there are some tactics that, as far as I can tell, are common to most fascist movements. Four important ones come to mind: noise, bad faith “dialogue,” bombast, and jingoism. Let’s look at them one by one.

Strategy #1: Noise

Fascist ideas collapse under very little examination; noise is therefore their ally. Noise here means sheer, disorienting volume of communication—the crazier the better. Because the idea is not to triumph over opponents through force of argument, but simply to take up the most media “real estate.” Being ridiculous is no drawback here, because it invites journalists to cover you, whether for the sake of laughing at you or in an attempt to debunk the nonsense, and the more they do that, the more eyeballs you get. And when we hear something over and over and over and over and over and over, it invites our brains to just give up and go with it.

Donald Trump, whether by genius or blind instinct, is a master of this technique. He constantly says and does things that are so over-the-top and unacceptable that journalists are practically forced to discuss it, and he reaps the attention that his antics earn him. Trump was able to force through a lot of his outrageous decisions partly because the American people were exhausted by the avalanche of insanity pouring from the White House on a daily, even hourly basis. There was too little energy left to mount an effective resistance. It’s like a glitterbomb: dramatic, entertaining, and impossible to get off of you.

The media have, to all appearances, learned nothing from the 2016 election. If Trump runs again in 2024, it will be in exactly the same way, and probably with exactly the same result; the only change will be that he no longer has a Twitter account, which actually could make a difference—no platform is more perfectly adapted to spreading noise than Twitter. Don’t count on it, though: new platforms spring up like toadstools every day.

Strategy #2: Bad Faith “Dialogue”

This is a two-part defensive strategy. Step one is using code. The things fascists say and imply about non-white peoples, the disabled, and other out-groups rightly horrify normal people, if they just say them. Hence, in public forums, they code their beliefs in euphemisms and dog-whistles. They won’t open with “Mexicans don’t deserve human rights”; they’ll open by talking about “illegals,” “cartels,” and so on, and leave it to the audience to color in the lines they’ve drawn. Leftists1 recognize dog whistles, though, and point them out—which initiates step two.

Step two is the free speech argument. This instantly tugs on American heartstrings. We love us some First Amendment! Now, what leftists are (usually) doing here is (a) highlighting dishonest rhetoric, and (b) calling on platforms and institutions to enforce bans on hate speech. Neither of these things violate the First Amendment; social media platforms, colleges, and the like are not branches of the government. Even if they were, the right to free speech does not protect incitement to violence, which is intrinsic to fascism. But fascists will always frame these issues as left-wing censorship and people being afraid of ideas. The fact that ideas like “Certain people are subhuman” are inherently dangerous is disguised with noise.

This tactic works really well on classical Liberals, because they almost always operate on the assumption that everyone is presenting their ideas in good faith. That’s the first rule of the game they’re playing. But fascists are playing a different game entirely, in which honesty isn’t important.

Strategy #3: Bombast

One of the salient characteristics of fascist rhetoric is the way it relies on conflict. Fear of the other, and the defensive hostility that fear engenders, are fascism’s bread and butter. A lot of people mistakenly assume that fascists will therefore openly stoke racial and political hatreds, but they’re usually smarter than that. They need the audience to be on their side, so they use the bad faith “dialogue” tactic first. Once they’ve won over the crowd, or enough of it, only then do they begin whipping them into a frenzy. They will always fan the flames of anxiety and rage, never quell them; they will never say that fear or hatred of an out-group is irrational. At a certain point, any division—real or perceived—between fascist leadership and their enemies is enough to set loyalists on fire.

Once again, Trump is a master at this. Whatever else we say about the assault on the Capitol last month, the rioters certainly believed they were doing what Trump wanted. The point, though, is to notice how instantaneously they turned on former figureheads, like the police or Mike Pence. The fact that there was a rift between these figureheads and Trump didn’t make them pause to think or question. It only enraged them. That is the function of bombast: to not only bypass, but actively shut down the frontal cortex.

Strategy #4: Jingoism

Here, we come to the closest thing fascism has to an actual idea. Now, patriotism, i.e. love of one’s country, is fine. Even nationalism is fine, to the extent that it means love of one’s people and culture. Jingoism goes further. Jingoism is “My country, right or wrong”; which, as Chesterton drily pointed out, is exactly like saying “My mother drunk or sober.” Where the patriot loves his country, the jingoist insists—not just as a sentimental flourish, but in all seriousness—that his country is better than other countries. That it has fewer flaws, or none; that it has rights over and above what other countries have. “Teach American exceptionalism” is an incredibly vague and silly phrase on one level, but on another, we know exactly what it would mean in practice.

The GOP, playing to the nationalist wing of its base, has gone in hard on jingoism. It has long been more ostentatiously patriotic than the Democrats; not, I think, because Democrats are unpatriotic, but because American patriotism tends to emphasize individualism, nostalgia for the fifties and the eighties, and (in certain moods) war and conquest. Emotionally, those sit a lot more comfortably with Republican talking points than Democratic ones. Helping the disadvantaged and tolerating the unfamiliar conflict with individualism and nostalgia.

This results in a base of people who are extra susceptible to fascist rhetoric. Remember the mythology, the emphasis on heritage, the fear and contempt for the out-group, that animate it. Best of all, once enough of the populace are drunk on jingoist propaganda, those who disagree are not merely political opponents, but traitors.


1Obligatory not-all-leftists statement goes here. Some leftists fall for dog-whistles too, or identify things as dog-whistles that are perfectly innocent.

antifascism

culture war

politics

Previous Post



February 12, 2021

FASH 105: "The Great Replacement"

Next Post



February 16, 2021 Review: "No Longer Strangers" by Gregory Coles


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category abuse antifascism art bad Catholic celibacy chastity Church crucifixion culture war eros forgiveness gay gender homophobia ikons language liturgy peace poems politics Pope Francis prayer pro-life race recommendations reform repentance review sacraments saints satire scandal schism scripture sex suffering theology Uncategorized violence

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What was the currency for the temple tax?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Shekel Mina Denarius Talent

Related posts from Mudblood Catholic

Family

With My Body, I Thee Worship: Part One

Mudblood Catholic

Family

Review: "Tenderness"

Mudblood Catholic

Family

Peace on Earth—War on Twitter

Mudblood Catholic

Family

Sempiternam Requiem

Mudblood Catholic

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Catholic

Letters on Living the Faith by C.S. Lewis

Most of us met C.S. Lewis as a public intellectual. Mere Christianity....

When Halloween Unmasks Married Hearts

Written by Dr. David K. Ewen from Eternal Truth Bible College Behind...

Jesus Was Not an Aristotelian

Aristotle. He’s been called the father of logic, the father of the...

Methodist Central Hall and Westminster Abbey

Situated on the same square is Methodist Central Hall and Westminster Abbey. ...

57th Dove Awards Honor Dolly Parton, Crown New...

On gospel music’s biggest night, the 57th annual GMA Dove Awards honored...

The First Eucharistic Controversy: Christ’s Real Presence

For Catholics, the Eucharist is the source and summit of the Christian...

view all Catholic blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube