Why Pro-Lifers Should Vote Blue: The Catch

Last updated on: April 22, 2020 at 5:26 pm by Gabriel Blanchard

Why Pro-Lifers Should Vote Blue: The Catch 2020-04-22T17:26:50-04:00 Gabriel Blanchard

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Intro; The Misters President; The Unsafety Net

So far we’ve taken a look at some different ways of approaching pro-life voting, some data about how Democratic administrations and policies lead to an actual decrease in abortion rates, and some reasons why that correlation seems to be the case. All that, taken together, leads me to the conclusion that voting blue is more pro-life than voting red, even if we (quite artificially) restrict our definition of “pro-life” to the unborn. In fact we should do no such thing: the current crisis has made it clear not only that universal access to health care is an urgent need, but that many people who style themselves pro-life are thoroughly scornful of the lives of the elderly and the disadvantaged. Moreover, both war and the death penalty are life issues, and while the Democratic Party is bad on both, the GOP is consistently worse.

But I said from the beginning that there was a catch, and it is time to discuss it. The catch is that the DNC has made pro-choice law a plank of its platform; and, as pragmatic as I’ve argued we ought to be, that does matter.

A system of law that declines to recognize certain categories of people as human is in serious trouble. Dehumanizing people on grounds of ethnicity or class or citizenship, or whatever else, is common in any system; but when such dehumanization is enshrined in law, that dehumanization has a tendency to accelerate and calcify. Cultures influence laws, to be sure, but laws also influence cultures—you don’t have to be an Integralist to recognize that. Even while arguing that Christians, and pro-lifers in general, would do better to vote for Democrats rather than Republicans, I don’t in the least want to discourage people from attempting to reform the Democratic Party on the specifically legal question of recognizing the unborn as people.

I’m more prepared to put law on the backburner for a few reasons, some of which I’ve already discussed. One reason I haven’t discussed so far is concern for the legal status and autonomy of women: I do think preserving a life is more important than preserving bodily autonomy, but it’s still important to protect bodily autonomy both culturally and legally, and laws against abortion have been and continue to be applied (or even deliberately formulated) in ways that endanger women’s independence. (This especially applies to women of color; personally, I don’t think it’s a coïncidence that this young Alabama woman outrageously charged with manslaughter for being shot and losing her baby in 2018 was black.) The pro-life movement as a whole has not grappled seriously with the concernes raised by many feminists, both pro-choice and pro-life, preferring to dismiss these issues as mere ideology. This bad-faith refusal to engage both makes pro-choice rhetoric about autonomy more credible, and exacerbates real misogyny among pro-life people.

I can’t truthfully claim to have a good solution here. And of course, our political system was not designed to fit neatly into Catholic Social Teaching, nor was either party. For that matter, while I hold to a pro-life ethic, I am less than impressed with the pro-life movement en masse; it helped elect one of the most dangerous, corrupt, incompetent presidents we’ve ever had, one who clearly has no problem killing people, letting sick people die for profit, and ripping families apart. I think there is a “best course of action under the circumstances,” and I’ve done my best to outline what I think it is and why I think so; but I won’t pretend to have dogmatic confidence in my conclusions—only prudential confidence. Or, more briefly: I hope and pray that I’m right about this.

politics

pro-life

Previous Post

April 17, 2020

Insomnia

Next Post

April 30, 2020 Why Pro-Lifers Should Vote Blue: Postscript

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category abuse antifascism art bad Catholic celibacy chastity Church crucifixion culture war eros forgiveness gay gender homophobia ikons language liturgy peace poems politics Pope Francis prayer pro-life race recommendations reform repentance review sacraments saints satire scandal schism scripture sex suffering theology Uncategorized violence

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What is the repeated phrase at the end of Psalm 136?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Let everything praise him Praise the Lord His love endures forever Blessed be the Lord