Clapback Comes for the Archbishop, Part One

Last updated on: September 30, 2019 at 4:56 pm by Gabriel Blanchard

Clapback Comes for the Archbishop, Part One 2019-09-30T16:56:21-04:00 Gabriel Blanchard

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Archbishop Charles Chaput’s recent column about Fr James Martin, and the latter’s reply, have been swirling through the online Catholisphere. Unlike their partisans, both are courteous—His Excellency goes out of his way to point out that the personal attacks many people have made against Fr Martin are not only ugly, but fundamentally unchristian, and the latter’s reply receives the former’s criticism with good grace.

I had heard some infuriating things about the Archbishop’s column; for instance, I’d been told he said (in substance) that the Church has been not only well-meaning but effective in making gay people welcome, and that those who don’t feel welcomed are simply prejudiced against her teaching. His column turned out, mercifully, to be a good deal more reasonable than that. I’m not completely happy about it, but, in order to contextualize what I dislike about it, I should discuss my feelings about Fr Martin a little bit first.

In fairness, I must first admit to something of a grudge against him because he is a Jesuit. I haven’t had bad experiences with Jesuits, understand, but I’ve never liked the ethos of contemporary American Jesuits (despite how much I share with it): maybe it’s because I grew up evangelical, and Reformed at that, but the atmosphere of conciliation and pastoral gentleness and soft-pedaling doctrine is something I strongly dislike. And it’s something Fr Martin has a lot of. I’m much more in line with Edmund Pevensie’s bad-news-first outlook from Voyage of the Dawn Treader: “If there’s a wasp in the room I like to be able to see it.” And I do actually enjoy and get a lot out of doctrine, so soft-pedaling it not only makes no appeal to me, it actively repels me. But none of these things entails false doctrine, nor true doctrine being insincerely espoused; and not everyone is me. So while I am free to dislike this style, and while I’m prepared to criticize it when that seems called for (every spiritual style is open to criticism, after all, since we’re imperfect beings), I won’t say that it’s illicit in itself.

But while I’m here criticking, I do have mixed feelings about Fr Martin’s LGBTQ+ ministry.

On the one hand, while he points out that he has said, several times and in plain English, that he doesn’t challenge the Church’s teaching about homosexuality, that phrase is the proverbial wax nose that can be pushed into any posture you like. The chadtrad who wants to believe that Fr Martin is a closet heretic can brush it aside as either another lie or a sneaky way of saying “Well, I’m not going to challenge the Church, but I don’t really subscribe to what she says here—I just put up with her saying it.” That reading isn’t fair, but it’s understandable.

What bothers me more than uncharitable readings from people who wouldn’t trust him anyway, though, is the prospect of a fellow gay person (for quite different reasons) reading such statements in almost the same way. Hoping this is something Fr Martin is saying because, after all, he has to to protect his job, but he doesn’t really believe it, and we don’t have to either. That person is in for a nasty, possibly faith-damaging, shock, if and when that intellectual question comes to a point. And in my experience, intellectual questions have a way of coming to a point. That’s one of the ways in which not being clear and forthright about doctrine can be unkind to people. (1)

Fr Martin’s habitual and (to my knowledge) uncriticizing association with groups like New Ways Ministries—which promotes doctrinal dissent on this very issue, and has a track record of disobedience to boot—only strengthens the impression that, whatever he says, he doesn’t really believe the Church’s teaching. And while no one should be judged solely on the impression they give, it seems either naïve or disingenuous to expect anything else. It’s difficult, for someone like me, to trust someone like that.

The reason my feelings about him are mixed, rather than merely negative, is that what he is trying do in a flawed way, most Catholics are not trying to do at all. His attempt to reach out to LGBTQ+ people isn’t perfect, but frankly, he’s about the only Catholic clergyman I can think of who not only talks about treating us with respect, but has actually bothered to find out what we consider respectful and made any effort at all to meet those considerations. Listening to someone is one of the first and most basic parts of respecting them, and priests generally don’t listen to us. They are too busy telling us what a great job they’re doing respecting us.

Part Two; Excursus

(1) Not that kindness can be satisfied merely by being clear and forthright about doctrine, however badly a lot of traddies want to pretend it can.

Images via Pixabay

Church

gay

scandal

Previous Post

September 18, 2019

Don't Leave Me

Next Post

September 25, 2019 Clapback Comes for the Archbishop, Part Two

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category abuse antifascism art bad Catholic celibacy chastity Church crucifixion culture war eros forgiveness gay gender homophobia ikons language liturgy peace poems politics Pope Francis prayer pro-life race recommendations reform repentance review sacraments saints satire scandal schism scripture sex suffering theology Uncategorized violence

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

True or False: Twelve spies were sent to explore Canaan, and all gave a positive report.

Select your answer to see how you score.

TRUE FALSE