{"id":46722,"date":"2024-06-23T11:30:21","date_gmt":"2024-06-23T18:30:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/monkeymind\/?p=46722"},"modified":"2024-06-25T21:44:20","modified_gmt":"2024-06-26T04:44:20","slug":"unitarian-universalisms-not-exactly-creeds","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/monkeymind\/2024\/06\/unitarian-universalisms-not-exactly-creeds.html","title":{"rendered":"Unitarian Universalism’s Not Exactly Creeds"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<\/head>
<\/a><\/p>\n
Big things going on in Unitarian Universalist world.<\/p>\n
And I find it time for some reflection.<\/p>\n
The UUA I belonged to as a working minister between when received my first call to a parish in 1991 and 2016 when I officially retired, was framed by a document called the \u201cPrinciples and Purposes.\u201d<\/p>\n
We, the member congregations of the Unitarian Universalist Association, covenant to affirm and promote<\/em><\/p>\n
-
\nThe inherent worth and dignity of every person;<\/em><\/li>\nJustice, equity and compassion in human relations;<\/em><\/li>\nAcceptance of one another and encouragement to spiritual growth in our congregations;<\/em><\/li>\nA free and responsible search for truth and meaning;<\/em><\/li>\nThe right of conscience and the use of the democratic process within our congregations and in society at large;<\/em><\/li>\nThe goal of world community with peace, liberty, and justice for all;<\/em><\/li>\n
-
Respect for the interdependent web of all existence of which we are a part.<\/em><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
The living tradition which we share draws from many sources:<\/em><\/p>\n-
\nDirect experience of that transcending mystery and wonder, affirmed in all cultures, which moves us to a renewal of the spirit and an openness to the forces which create and uphold life;<\/em><\/li>\nWords and deeds of prophetic women and men which challenge us to confront powers and structures of evil with justice, compassion, and the transforming power of love;<\/em><\/li>\nWisdom from the world\u2019s religions which inspires us in our ethical and spiritual life;<\/em><\/li>\nJewish and Christian teachings which call us to respond to God\u2019s love by loving our neighbors as ourselves;<\/em><\/li>\nHumanist teachings which counsel us to heed the guidance of reason and the results of science, and warn us against idolatries of the mind and spirit.<\/em><\/li>\n
-
Spiritual teachings of earth-centered traditions which celebrate the sacred circle of life and instruct us to live in harmony with the rhythms of nature.<\/em><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
Grateful for the religious pluralism which enriches and ennobles our faith, we are inspired to deepen our understanding and expand our vision. As free congregations we enter into this covenant, promising to one another our mutual trust and support.<\/em><\/p>\n
This statement was enshrined as article 2 of the denomination\u2019s bylaws. It was repeatedly asserted that this document \u201cis not a creed.\u201d Rather it was meant to be a snapshot of the general consensus view of the disparate spiritual and even anti-spiritual folk who chose voluntarily to gather as members of this band, itself the blending of two historic American Christian denominations, the American Unitarian Association and the Universalist Church of America. It also was meant to provide a broad sense of what Unitarian Universalists were about in this world.<\/p>\n
In practice, of course, it became a quasi-creed as soon as it was officially voted on in 1985. And as such was subject to constant critical examination, with various people adding in their personal qualifications, and sometimes dissent, and occasional ridicule. Over the years I witnessed proof texting and recitations of how someone was in violation of the P&Ps and what that meant with a lot of heat. Usually something bad. Just like with my orthodox Christian friends and their official and presumed forever creeds.<\/p>\n
Among the differences between our article 2 and creeds was how it was supposed to be reviewed periodically. Whatever, the intention. We didn\u2019t very much. And with one modification, the addition of a source, and one failed attempt to spiritualize the language of the 7th principle, it stood basically the same for some thirty-nine years, fully encompassing my twenty-five years as a UU minister.<\/p>\nIts elasticity and two of the principles taken together formed the lattice work for my own work. I was one among a band who referred to themselves as \u201cfirst and seventh principle\u201d preachers. The first principle asserting the worth of all people, the second providing a context of radical interdependence. As a Mahayana Buddhist<\/a> profoundly sympathetic to the western religious tradition, the Enlightenment, and much of the modernist project, it worked. I had my various personal caveats. But it worked.<\/p>\n
I wove my ministerial life guided by it and I believe I served many hearts better than not.<\/p>\n
Quibbles. In the last, quibbles.<\/p>\n
Love after all. That\u2019s the bottom line. And it\u2019s a wonderful bottom line.<\/p>\n
The UUAs article 2 is dead.<\/p>\n
The UUAs article 2 is voted and alive.<\/p>\n
May it live as long as it serves the hearts and needs of the community.<\/p>\n
-