Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Buddhist
Brad Warner’s Other Side of Nothing: A Review

Brad Warner’s Other Side of Nothing: A Review

Last updated on: August 4, 2022 at 11:02 am by James Ford

Brad Warner’s Other Side of Nothing: A Review 2022-08-04T11:02:35-07:00 James Ford

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Other Side of Nothing: The Zen Ethics of Time, Space, and Being

Brad Warner

New World Library, Novato, 2022

A Review

James Ishmael Ford

I was offered a copy of Brad Warner’s new book, the Other Side of Nothing in exchange for a review. I said sure.

Now the pile of what I must be reading has gotten so high I’m in danger of the pile collapsing with who knows what possible devastation following. As it turns out it’s also a larger book than anything else he’s written, at least as I recall. Finally, accepting that I wanted to read it, but had limited time to devote to it, I jumped in and read it in one sitting. I feel a bit too fast. It deserved better. But, I believe I have it well enough down to give an honest and helpful review.

The opening sentence of the book is “You are not reading this book.” I thought, okay. So? And? Well, the “and” of it was to explain to the reader that “There is no ‘you.’” Rather, the whole idea of a self is a fiction. Brad defines this perspective as nondualism. Actually, I find such a bald statement an un-nuanced version of nonduality. But okay. I’ve read several of Brad Warner’s books, he often likes to begin with something startling, and I’ve generally found what he has to say after that helpful. So, I continued.

A couple pages further in he wants us to know “Zen Buddhism is not a religion.” He went on to say how for the most part Zen Buddhists don’t “like to call themselves ‘Zen Buddhists.’” The first assertion is a view, and one held by many. And it’s a view with which I have some serious affinities. But, a truth of the matter is, there are very compelling reasons to say Zen Buddhism is very much a religion. In fact I think it fair to say most people with an informed view of comparative religious studies would categorize Zen Buddhism very much as a religion. And I’m confident his second statement is simply factually incorrect beyond a caveat for cultural linguistic usage. A subset of Western Zen Buddhists might resist the designation. But not most.

At this point if it weren’t a book by Brad Warner, I’d put it down.

However, I persisted.

He goes on to explain the original intent of the book is an exploration of Zen Buddhist ethics. A rich subject. There are only a small handful of such investigation available. As a small aside in my view the earliest English language effort is probably still the best, Robert Aitken’s Mind of Clover: Essays in Zen Buddhist Ethics. Check it out.

But, Warner says he quickly found that an exploration of Zen and Buddhism’s understanding of the structures of reality is critical if we want to understand Zen’s views about ethics. Here, I found myself agreeing and, rather more importantly, interested in his take on the matter. I find I learn things reading Warner.

He quickly outlines a description of Zen Buddhism that a scholar would probably call “modernist.” It resonates with my views. He also offered his assertion:

“Zen Buddhism is not a set of beliefs and dogmas. Rather, it’s a way to learn to clearly see what reality actually is, beyond all dogmas and beliefs.”

Of course there are lots of beliefs and dogmas in Zen and in Buddhism. And, I agree with Warner, Zen Buddhism is also a way to learn how to clearly see what reality actually is. I think noting it is a messy project might have been more helpful. Certainly it would be more accurate. One might say in spite of Zen’s beliefs and dogmas there is a way into genuine depth.

Beliefs and dogmas I find are especially dangerous to someone seeking to encounter for oneself what actually is. Ideas about the deep are quite seductive, especially when they’re most accurate. The temptation with the best of beliefs and dogmas is to find ourselves settling for someone else’s understanding. People do it all the time, sometimes with wildly unlikely beliefs, sometimes with subtle and profound beliefs. Zen people, well, you bet they’re not excluded from missing the invitation because their statements of belief and their dogmas cut closer to true than one often finds in religions.

But he doesn’t spend a whole lot of time there. Instead he quickly moves to the point.

Here Warner offers some insights from the Japanese missionary Shohaku Okumura, who uses a lovely analogy of a music performance to point to how we exist within that real. For me a critical sentence and worthy for anyone hoping for a genuine pointer on their own way into the deep goes, “We cannot say oneness and multiplicity are different and we cannot say they are the same.”

This is the mess of the real. Warner is right you don’t exist. Nor do I. And, at the same time, of course we do, you and I. What is missing in the bald assertion is the contingency of our existence. In the Zen text the Jewel Mirror Samadhi we are told “you are not it, but in truth it is you.” That. I really appreciated Warner’s unpacking of nonduality from a Zen perspective. He especially knows his Dogen.

He then elided into a citation of the modern Advatia Vedanta Hindu teacher Nisargadatta Maharaj, introducing the word illusion. In my Zen training the word illusion was usually avoided. It’s an important Hindu term, but Zen teachers, in my experience, resist it as too easy a place to rest, and a way to miss what we really are. Something a bit messier than illusion with an implied real opposed to the illusion.

It also implied that as we proceeded, we would not be limited to a single angle on the mystery of the real. That we would step away from the beliefs and dogmas of Zen in this investigation. Certainly works for me. If we want to avoid the traps of beliefs and dogmas on the way of intimacy a little comparative mysticism can be enormously helpful.

And. One of the things I like about Brad Warner, which can be missed with his penchant for categorical statements about what Zen Buddhism is. And that’s his persistent assertion he makes mistakes, he misses things, he is learning. Me too. Along side the bravado is a real person of the way. So, I continued on to learn from him in his new book. With as we all do when reading anything worth reading engaging in a dialogue.

The book sets the stage a bit more fully with a brief account of how he came to be the person writing this book. I’ve read versions of this before, and this is Brad at his most mature confessional style. It was inviting and echoes much of the attraction many of us who like Brad Warner’s work over the years.

Then he opens the door toward the Advaita, or as he correctly say neo-Advaita that will be part of the dialogue of the book. He also summarized the teachings of his primary teacher Gudo Nishijima, which is critical for anyone trying to understand Warner’s school of Zen. There are several, and as noted he has a tendency to present his view as normative.

Warner then outlines the Eightfold Path teaching with constant reference to personal behavior, to our individual ethics. It’s good. At this point in my life old territory. But, he opened angles and it was worth the read.

It’s critical for anyone hoping to understand Zen’s take on the nondual to have some sense of the Heart Sutra, and Warner does a good job welcoming us into that ancient text. He also offers one of my favorite chapters in the book, a reflection on makyo, which was published in Tricycle.

With this he turns to the precepts as understood in Japanese Zen.

But as he says it was his original intention to write about ethics, and after giving the precepts their due, he turns back to that world view thing, the idea of nonduality, and its invitations. Warner’s foundation is Dogen’s Zen. And a very good foundation it is. He has spent a great deal of his life studying and reflecting on those teachings as pointers in his own practice and his developed view of how things are.

I really liked that. It’s informed, it’s well written, it points to what I believe in my bones to be true. Presented from different enough of an angle for me to stretch and learn. I’m grateful.

He then turns to neo-Vedanta. An area I know little about, but which has long intrigued me. In my own quest for challenges, corrections, and invitations into the deeper aspects of Zen, I’ve personally turned mostly to Christian mystics. (As a small aside there’s another book with nearly the same title the Other Side of Emptiness that might be worth a read for anyone interested in what one might find out of nonduality when approached from the Christian mystical perspective.) Here I see what wealth there is to be found in India’s great response to Buddhism.

Somewhere about sixty percent of the way maybe a bit more through he offers an extensive quote from the old Anglo-American trickster teacher Alan Watts. In that kind of wonderful coincidence some make meaningful, I’ve been thinking a lot of Watt’s line about the universe being God playing peek-a-boo with itself. I’d been trying to recall the exact line, when I found it here in Warner’s book. Turns out the quote comes from the Book on the Taboo against Knowing Who You Are, which I read maybe fifty years ago, fifty years and change in all likelihood. As it turns out the image was hide and seek rather than peek-a-boo.

“…when God plays hide and pretends that he is you and I, he does it so well that it takes him a long time to remember where and how he hid himself…”

For Watts and Warner and, well, me, this is not the God of Abraham. At least not the God of Abraham most people think of when they say the word. The path of peek-a-boo, of hide and seek, for Watt’s noticing this is a call into sacred play. I think this is much of how Brad Warner sees the intimate matter, himself. Not normative Zen Buddhism, but authentic. As I said I’ve been thinking about this perspective a lot of late, myself. It has a ring of truth to it in my life. Although this God absolutely should not be taken as kittens and puppies. Recalling Arjuna’s confrontation with the destroyer of universes is important. Or, maybe Job’s.

Brad Warner’s concluding paragraph is called the Human Project. I take it as his best attempt at describing where this mysterious path we share in part has taken him.

My take on this book? Brad Warner is a serious life long practitioner of the Zen way. And over the many years he has come to something attractive, and I believe useful. As to this book? As a straight-forward introduction to Zen ethics I think there are better books. As a straight-forward exploration of nondualism, I think one is better off with Nonduality: In Buddhism and Beyond by David Loy.

I think he misses the part about social ill pretty much completely. A shadow of the modernist approach to Zen is a kind of reductionism. It actually can go in two ways. One is to forget it is a spiritual project. The other is to forget it isn’t really a self-improvement project, either. Brad’s Zen is ultimately, at least as I find he presents it, a profoundly personal project.

I noticed this especially in his understanding of karma. It’s all personal. Part of the reason it is abhorrent to blame the victim as we see in a reductionist and totally personal understanding of causality, is that cause and effect does not stop at one’s skin. Cause and effect is vast, and we have agency over only a part of the part we usefully call “me.” The thing Brad noted at the very beginning doesn’t really exist.

It’s messy. And Warner is certainly correct when he wrote of the great mess,

“You can’t make fix the economy, heal the natural environment, undo centuries of human abuse and neglect….But you can make a little difference. So make a little difference!“

I largely agree. And I think the mess of our awakening into our radical interdependence calls for at least a bit more attention to what that little difference might look like for someone walking the Zen way. Especially in our time and place where most of us reading Warner’s book or this review live in more or less democratic cultures with, in my view, an obligation of citizenship being involvement.

Finding the path that embraces the inward look is critical. But in my experience it also needs that hand reaching out. These days serious reflections on where the balance is are important. In my view.

I find the book a bit of a hot mess. It might have best been two books. Although as I noticed it’s more than helpful that Zen’s nonduality and the precepts are seen as co-arising. And he very much attends to the personal aspects of this co-arising. Which I found helpful for me. And thought will be helpful for others.

I do wish the book had an index.

What The Other Side of Nothing Is, in my view, is an honest and soul-searching personal confession of Zen Buddhism as an expression of the human encounter called nonduality, with some good words on practice, and some helpful reflections on rubber hitting the road stuff as regards individual behaviors in this messy world.

It’s a good book.

(Oh, and Brad. Regarding your conclusion. Right back atcha!)

I recommend it.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

August 3, 2022

A Feast for Zen's Layman Pang

Next Post

August 6, 2022 The Zen Minister's New Working Definition for the word Religion

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category A Christmas Carol Abolitionist African-American Ahmadiyya Alan Watts Aldous Huxley Allen Ginsberg Amedkar Jayanti American politics American Zen Anaheim Zen Sangha Anglican Annie Besant April Fool Armageddon Art and Religion artificial intellegence Atheist Awakening B R Ambedkar Barlaam & Josaphat Beatnik Between Bhagavad Gita Bible biography birthday bodhisattva Bodhisattva Precepts Book burning Book of Common Prayer Book of Mormon Brahmo Samaj Buddha Buddhism Buddhist Buddhist Lord's Prayer Butterflies Calendars cartoons cat ChatGPT Chicken Tortilla Soup choices Christian atheism Christian mysticism Christian origins Christian Science Christian Zen Christianity Christianity and Buddhism christmas Christmas Truce Christopher Isherwood Church of Later Day Saints Cinco de Mayo circus covenant critical thinking culture D. T. Suzuki Dalit Buddhism Daniel Defoe Desert Fathers and Mothers dharma talk Dogen Donald Trump Dongshan's Five Ranks Dorothy Day dream Duty Easter ecology Edwin Arnold emptiness Empty Moon Zen Network Episcopal Church Eternal Now Ethics evolution existentialism Faith fantasy Fathers Day film film review fire Five Ranks Folk music food Form and emptiness Four Seals Francis of Assisi Francis Xavier Free thinker friendship George MacDonald Gerald Heard Glenn Taylor Webb God Good Friday Gospel of Gospel of Mark Gospel of Thomas grace Graduate Theological Unioin Graduate Theological Union Guanyin H R Blyth Hakuin Ekaku Hanamatsuri Hanukkah Harada Yasutani Zen Heart Sutra Henry David Thoreau Hermann Hesse Hinduism History and Religion history of religion Holy Spirit home Hospitality Icon Ides of March Isaac Newton Islam Islamic mysticism Jack Kerouac James Luther Adams Jiddu Krishnamurti Joan of Arc Johannes Gutenberg John Donne joke Judaism justice karma kensho King James Bible koan Koun Yamada Kyoto School Lewis Carrol Liberal Christianity Liberal Religion Life Plan Community Liminal literature Literature and Religion Liturgy Lord's Prayer Love Mahatma Gandhi Mahayana Martin Luther King Jr Mary Baker Eddy Mary Magdelene Mary Oliver Mayflower Compact Meditation memories memory metaphor money money and religioin Mormons Mother's Day movie review mysticism mythic Neighborhood Unitarian Universalist Church New Thought Nichiren Buddhism Nonduality not knowing Omar Khayyam Pacific School of Religion pagan Palm Sunday Passover peace Pentecost perennialism Phantastes Philip Kapleau philosophy Pilgrimage poetry Poetry and Religion politics Prayer Precepts Printing Press prophecy prophetic spirituality psychology Pure Land Queer religion queering religion Quietism Ram Mohan Roy rebirth recipe Relationships and religion religion religion and history Religious syncretism Resistance Retirement Retreat review Rissho Kosei Kai Ritual Robert Aitken Roshi Robert Ingersoll Rohatsu Romani religion Rosie the Riveter saints samadhi SanboZen Sangha Satyagraha science science and reigion science and religion science fiction seminary sermon Sesshin Sex and Religion Shinran Sikh Sikh tradition silence Social Justice Socially Engaged Buddhism Society and religion Soto Zen soul spiritual community spiritual practice Spirituality Sufism Suicide superstition Taoism Television Teresa of Avila Thanksgiving theological schools Theosophy Thomas Merton Time Transcendentalism Transcendentalist Trinitarian Trinity Uncategorized unitarian Unitarian Christianity Unitarian Universalist Universalism Vajrayana Vedanta Walking war Willa Cather William Ellery Channing wisdom women and religion women in religion World Teacher Writing zazen Zen Zen Center Zen inspired retriement zen meditation Zen Precepts Zen women

Select a Month September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What happened when the Philistines captured the Ark of the Covenant?

Select your answer to see how you score.

The sun stood still The Jordan parted Dagon's idol fell Fire rained from heaven