Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

monkeymind

AMONG THE SNAKES & DRAGONS: Mind Bubbles on North American Zen Lives in the Twenty-First Century

Last updated on: April 18, 2021 at 9:25 pm   by James Ford

AMONG THE SNAKES & DRAGONS: Mind Bubbles on North American Zen Lives in the Twenty-First Century 2021-04-18T21:25:07-07:00 James Ford

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

 

 

AMONG THE SNAKES & DRAGONS
Mind Bubbles on North American Zen Lives in the Twenty-First Century

(A bit of a mess. A draft. To be worked on…)

James Ishmael Ford

“Ordinary people and saints live together. Dragons and snakes all mixed up.”

From the Blue Cliff Record, Case 35

Among the various maybes and possibilities of history is the suggestion that possibly a Chinese expedition including five Buddhist monks led by the Bhikshu Hui Shen touched at points along the California coast sometime before the fifth century of our common accounting. It’s unlikely, but I do enjoy thinking maybe, possibly.

The first truly reasonable assumption for Zen or Chan people actually here in North America would among the Chinese immigrants who came in the middle of the Nineteenth century. Gold Mountain as California was known in China, and indeed the whole Western coast was briefly a dream of possibilities for East Asians. Once here they created places of worship. And while mostly ad hoc, they must have had officiants and keepers of these places whether formal or informal. Sadly, we don’t really know much about the details. Still, what were originally called “joss houses” by the European descent folk absolutely existed. And it is no leap to assume these were places where people of the intimate way no doubt gathered.

Japanese immigrants would create perhaps  the first unambiguously Zen communities here in North America. In 1922, after establishing a temple in Hawaii, the Reverend Hosen Isobe established a Soto Zen temple in Los Angeles. A couple of years later he founded another temple in San Francisco. Others would follow.

And here it is important to note a divide almost immediately happening.

Part of the sadness for the Buddhist sanghas in the West, like for their Christian counterparts, are the fairly harsh lines between ethnic communities from East and West. So, it is relatively rare to see someone of European or African descent in the communities originally gathered to support Japanese or Korean immigrants and their children, and now grandchildren. And similarly, not a lot of crossover from the birthright communities into the European descent or, now just beginning, African American led communities.

(As a quick aside, I’m also noticing how birthright and convert are to some degree becoming outdated terms. as increasingly there are people of European descent who were born into Buddhist identified families. Although it still seems at this time the larger majority of the European American majority communities were raised in non-Buddhist families.)

Half a century ago Dr Martin Luther King, Jr observed Sunday morning as the most segregated hour in America. The divides at our religious moments continue. And it has turned out to be no different for Buddhists. For the self-reflecting person this reveals one more aspect of what we currently call white supremacy. That we see similar harsh divides between the dominant ethnicity and various minorities in other cultures is pretty cold comfort.

Perhaps it’s impossible to separate out a religious community from a larger cultural identity. I participate in a Japanese descent congregation with historic Zen connections, but is organized more as a church. I vividly recall one coffee hour when an old member talked about how in the past people tried to make them “more Western,” banning some traditional marginally Buddhist Japanese holidays that were part of the church calendar. “We fixed that,” he said. I couldn’t help thinking he was eying me as a potential part of a hypothetical future attempt at taking over and the bad things that could follow.

Whatever the deeper truth of that particular incident, these divides certainly have been playing out within the importation of Buddhism to the West. For me this apparently unconscious repeating of ancient tribal-like patterns is harsh and sobering. Especially as in North America we live in cultures that rhetorically see themselves as expressly not based in where our ancestors came from. I’ve tasted just a bit of what that othering can look like when finding myself among Japanese Zen priests. And I hate, hate, how it happens to practitioners of Asian descent in our European dominant groups.

I find it all an invitation into humility. One I fail at constantly, but constantly aspire to. Frankly, what we fail at constantly, but into which we’re constantly invited. We’ve had some success in addressing gender equity, although it still is a work I progress. That has only worked because we all pay attention, and we all try to open our hearts. What we’re about in this project is too important for us to not confront our failings. Noticing this lacuna in my, and I suspect many people’s understanding of this tradition and its communities, invites further examination about the nature of religious communities, writ large. Although as I see it, for us specifically. Fortunately, there are those doing that hard work right now.

And this particular reflection is focused. It isn’t even concerned with Buddhism writ large in the West. But rather this is a consideration of the establishment of Zen communities, lineages, and training centers in North America. And what is happening as these communities emerge.

While, as I said, I have an ongoing relationship with a Japanese American community in Long Beach, for which I am deeply grateful; my principal participation continues to be among the emergent largely Western born and culturally European rooted communities.  I should add it includes people of Asian descent, as well as increasingly people identifiable as Latinx and African-Americans. The lines demarcating this emergent pheneomenon is not hard, in fact sometimes the juiciest areas are where the divisions are in fact not so clear. That said there is something emerging.

And it has history. It has a story. And that story of this emerging community of practice can be outlined briefly.

In the years before the Second World War a handful of Zen teachers began to work with Westerners. Among them the Soto missionary Soyu Matsuoka, the lay Rinzai master Sokei-an, and the priest Nyogen Senzaki, a disciple of the renowned Rinzai master Soyen Shaku who himself visited America to participate in the 1893 World Parliament of Religions in Chicago.

Probably the most important thing for reaching the non-Asian community during these years were the writings of D. T. Suzuki, another disciple of Soyen Shaku, a lay Rinzai practitioner and scholar who wrote compellingly of something called Zen enlightenment. A British admirer, Alan Watts, took Suzuki’s writings and ran with it. Sokei-an’s America widow Ruth Fuller Sasaki would immigrate to Japan, ordain, and then lead a translation team who would join in the project begun by Suzuki in providing an increasing wealth of Zen materials in English. The Beats picked up the rhetoric, and Zen, and enlightenment, and koans, especially the sound of one hand clapping became a part of the intellectual counterculture.

In the 1950s and early 1960s a number of personalities central to the establishment of Zen as practice began to take their place here. Shunryu Suzuki representing Soto Zen, Rinzai priests Joshu Sasaki and Eido Shimano settled in America. Before the 1960s were over Hsuan Hua would bring Chinese Chan, while Thich Thein An and Thich Nhat Hanh brought Vietnamese Thien. Philip Kapleau, Robert Aitken, and Richard Baker would become the first Americans of European descent to be acknowledged as teachers. It wouldn’t be until 1972 that the Korean master Seung Sahn arrived, but his peripatetic nature quickly assuring a version of Korean Son would also become a widely available option. In the same year the Rinzai priest Sogen Omori established a training temple in Hawaii. Finally in 2007 the Korean Taego priest Jongmae Park initiated a domestic training program for North Americans and Europeans.

Some of these would not make significant inroads among converts. For instance, while the Venerable Hsuan Hua’s community is extensive, but only counts a handful of non-Chinese descent people. Although while this is largely true of the mission of the Venerable Sheng Yen, his dharma transmission to several lay heirs is becoming increasingly significant in our shaping North American and Western Zen.

That less direct influence can also be said of the Korean Jogye based communities in the West, although it should be noted the other Korean Zen organization, the Taego Order is now aggressive in attempting to bridge the gap between East and West.

I need to mark out Thich Nhat Hanh’s Interbeing Order here. It is large. He personally is terribly influential on the shape of the dharma in the West. But the organization he founded is also manifesting in sufficiently different ways than the other Zen-identified communities that I believe it should be studied either on its own or as part of the much larger manifestation of Buddhism come west.

As I write these words it’s the beginning of Spring in the year 2021. What I’ve come to think of as the “great die off” is beginning. The first generation of convert Zen practitioners and teachers, my generation are rapidly aging. Within two decades a goodly majority of us will have died. A decade after that, perhaps two or three extremely aged teachers will still be around to tell of the heady days when it all began. Maybe not even those two or three.

There are now some substantial Zen communities. The San Francisco Zen complex is perhaps the largest. Significant training centers exist around the country. There are literally hundreds of small centers. There are several training monasteries. And many teachers. There are three trans-lineage institutions for teachers, the Soto Zen Buddhist Association, the American Zen Teachers Association, and the Lay Zen Teachers Association.

Our teachers include monastics, priests, householders, men, women, and people who live variously within the fluidity of human sexuality. I have been particularly proud of how we’ve faced sexuality, and issues of gender. Again, nowhere near a done deal. But, there have been mind boggling changes in a few decades; and it shows us a way forward. And should give us hope.

Our communities tend to identify largely with the American progressive camp. I suspect largely because interest in religions outside of one’s birth communities comes with some of the freedoms that accompany higher education and higher income levels. Certainly, the demographics of the North American Zen communities show well educated people who at least began in the middle and upper middle classes. Again, for those who notice the demographics, class and access to Zen training for those not financially privileged joins the issues of race among the problematic issues of this emergent movement.

One of the most interesting things I’ve seen as I look at Zen as it is forming in the West is how there is no hard divide between a larger community of believers and a smaller professional class. When people speak of Zen ad their relationship to it, they almost always use the term “practice,” saying they are “Zen practitioners.” Not believers. Often, not even Buddhists. Practitioners. I will return to this later in this reflection.

There are no reliable numbers that I know of for this community. But, based on my observations, I’d hazard here in America, people of European, African, and Asian descent specifically committed to Zen and its disciplines as defined as North American Zen probably number between ten to fifteen thousand people. Those ten to fifteen thousand people are gathered into communities of practice and depth all across the country, although there is a weighting toward the West and East coasts. Almost all are small. Possibly with only one or two exceptions, all are very precarious.

And. Of course, there’s the die off coming. As small as our numbers are I believe there are enough younger people here and continuing to come in to pretty much assure there will continue to be a Zen presence. I suspect it will be dicey, but I am pretty sure something will continue.

What isn’t really clear is out of the plethora of Zen practices that are flowering, which are the ones that will survive? I look at the San Francisco Zen Center complex, with its three anchoring institutions, the City Center, Green Gulch, and its rural training temple Tassajara, as well as its various branches gathered as “Branching Streams,” and there is no doubt younger people are attracted and are committing to the rigors of their requirements, which include a five year residency. The other major institutions, the White Plum and the Kwan Um, while they have different expectations for their members, there remain serious commitments to practice.

The other two major lineages the White Plum, a Japanese derived lineage that is rooted in the Soto school but is heavily marked by the transmission of a reformed koan curriculum has at least as many participants as Branching Streams. However, while there is a historic home temple, the Zen Center of Los Angeles, the individual sub lineages are wildly diverse and the closer one looks the harder it is to see what holds it together beyond the lineage itself and perhaps a lingering admiration for its founder’s charismatic and visionary first successor among the converts, Bernie Glassman. The Kwan Um also has a center training temple in Cumberland, Rhode Island. It has a more centralized training program, but it has mutated from its founder’s vision of a combined monastic and householder leadership, becoming almost exclusively a lay organization.

I think I have to add in the rapidly growing Taego order as an organization that may have sticking power. And then there is the Soto Zen Buddhist Association. It sees its mission as providing a center for the various Soto lineages now represented in North America and to some degree elsewhere in the metaphorical west. Although it may be tested in the coming years with the development of a possible institution more closely under the control of the Soto Zen mission in North America.

Early in my Zen life, when I was a monastic at Shasta Abbey, a new monk joined our community. The buzz was how he was a fully transmitted Obaku priest, which we were given to understand was a subbranch of the Rinzai schools. As the weeks unfolded it came out that he had just made up these ordinations. While he was the first fraudulent teacher I would meet, over the years there have been many individuals some I’ve known personally, others I’ve just read of, who have decided the best route to teaching authority was simply to make up one’s authorizations.

As the years have progressed there have been fewer and fewer of these people who just make it all up. Sadly, I believe, because getting a “real” authorization has become very, very easy. For many years I was involved in the conversation about minimum standards within the Soto branches of our convert Zen communities. There tended to be three camps. There were those who wished to carry over the expectations of the Japanese Sotoshu. There were those who felt there needed to be substantial reforms to address the unique conditions here in the West and specifically North America. And there were those who felt dharma transmission was all that was required.

There is much to reflect on with the tradition of dharma transmission. And tied in with that: awakening. For dharma transmission I think the facts of its history and its various applications here in the West, we need to approach the matter with more humility, and caution. And we need constantly remind ourselves of the centrality of awakening. What awakening is, what it is not, and how our lives are actually expressions of some wild, fierce, terrible, endlessly lovely intimacy.

But these things that lapse into poetry need to manifest in prose.

The largest contingent among our emergent North American Zen are the various Soto lineages. The questions of alignment with the Sotoshu and its historic expectations have created fractures in the North American Soto community, and currently seems to be leading to the creation of a body that is directly under the control of the Japanese church in addition to the Soto Zen Buddhist Association, which was created with the encouragement of the Sotoshu to create a dialogue partner. Hard to say what will come of this.

The “we only need dharma transmission camp” has been the primary source of teachers with extremely limited formation. And there are a lot of them. They often gravitate to the inter webs. And their teachings tend to reflect a lot of reading if not a lot of practice, and often less actual encounter with the fundamental matters of the heart. Lots of right and wrong, not a lot of invitation into intimacy.

What is complicated is that some of them actually are wise and some among the wise seem able to guide others. I’ve been dragged grudgingly into acknowledging this fact. And, as I am no longer actively involved with those trying to create formal standards, I personally am able to just appreciate the complex fact on the ground, without having to try and help create institutional guidelines to allow for acknowledging these people.

There will always be those more concerned with titles. There will always be snakes with the dragons. Always. All that noted, I suspect for some time to come the backbone of our North American Zen will continue to be those attempting to adapt as closely as possible the patterns we’ve inherited, including expecting monastic experience as central to formation. But, also, there is very much a growing edge, seeking rigor in formation, but acknowledging we are no longer primarily a monastic movement. And seeing this seeking ways to continue to find depth in our paths without necessitating going into a monastery.

Not long ago I posted a query on social media at several sites devoted to Zen practice asking about what formation experiences were expected, the necessary if not sufficient conditions in forming priests and teachers. The information I gleaned was too disparate to be part of any quantitative reflection. But I did notice how some very significant contemporary Western Zen teachers in their years of formation and practice, did not have that significant monastic experience. And I suspect this is going to continue to be a significant element of our forming North American Zen community.

In Japanese Zen one who leads first spends time in the monastery, usually between one and three years, and usually then trundles off to the family temple and a life as a parish minister. Some stay and dig in. Among those some small number will be recognized as masters of the way. In Soto “dharma transmission” is bestowed around the time one assumes pastoral duties and the home temple. Mastery is usually associated with the title “shiki.” A shiki is the person allowed to lead a training monastery. Rinzai does not conflate that priestly authorization allowing one to lead that home temple with dharma transmission, instead reserving it for those who become shiki within their school.

In China and Korea there was no direct connection between ordination as a monk or nun and dharma transmission, although almost all who received dharma transmission were monastics. The Taego order holds several transmission lines, but its North American branch does not appear to transmit one. (I am pursuing this thread and welcome any clarifications) With the interesting footnote that in Europe a Kwan Um Zen master has crossed over to the Taego, bring Seung Sanhn’s transmission into the community. Although my point here, is that with or without formal transmission, the Taego seems as authentic as Soto, or, for that matter, Rinzai communities here.

But the bottom line is the assumption that some form of monasticism is what actual Zen practitioners do. Chinese versions are different than Japanese. There is no parish priest option, as in Japan. One’s practice is monastic. Or, for some, householder. The Kwan Um school was founded to be both monastic and lay. Over the years the monastic option has largely fallen away, leaving an organization where the majority of its teachers are householders.

And with that, returning to that idea of enlightened householders. The foundational literature of Zen is full of examples of enlightened lay practitioners. Some even receive dharma transmission. Always a minority, but from close to the beginning always an actual real option.

In truth all Asian cultures most householders don’t have formal practices. Instead, a believer embraces a life marked by devotion, and support of the “professional” practitioners sometimes as a practice, sometimes as a way of accumulating merit, and more likely mostly some combination.

That noted, there have always been those householders. And some have been practitioners.

And. So. Here they are. Here we are. Many making Zen and the intimate way a central part of lives that also have a significant experience within the world. Working. Marrying. Raising children. To one degree or another, a normative assumption of being a Zen person is being a Zen practitioner. And here we find that somewhere between ten and fifteen thousand people.

What this new category of spiritual practitioner is, doesn’t have a good name. Lay suggests not serious. It also implies professionals and those who consume their services. The new baseline for this convert community is the assumption everyone is a practitioner. Everyone sits with an ideal of regularity. Everyone wants, if possible, to sit in retreat even if it is for seven or five or three or one or even half days.

It is out of this milieu, this context of practice some are called into leadership. Insight is acknowledged, and traditional marks of spiritual care are expected by the community and are acknowledged within the rites of transmission.

A while back I had an opportunity to visit Bhutan. I know next to nothing about the Vajrayana and its variants. But through past good karma or flat out undeserved good fortune, there I was. And there I learned about what they called gomchen. These are people who do not take monastic vows, and stay in or close to community, but who are seen as fulfilling several sacred functions for the larger community. I kind of like it. And it covers both those who’ve ordained but live in the world and sometimes folk who’ve never formally ordained but are part still very much part of this third place between monastic and householder. I suspect there is something useful for us in our emerging North American Zen in this.

And it is something of how we’re approaching the matter. The primacy of sitting intimacy, and koan, the wild dance with precept, and allowing additional wisdoms to seep into the matter marks our way out.

I envision something blessed in this North American Zen, this Western Zen, this Third Way Zen. It is messy. It welcomes the snakes and the dragons. It is sometimes resplendent, more often it’s a bit shabby. It is always about awakening, the finding of a place that does not deny but invites us beyond the many differences and the one.

A calling to all hungry hearts. Ordinary people. And saints.

Our part of the intimate way.

Uncategorized

Previous Post



April 16, 2021

The Zen Priest Considers the Secrets of the Religious and the Spiritual

Next Post



April 19, 2021 Poetry & the Beginner's Mind


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category A Christmas Carol Abolitionist African-American Ahmadiyya Alan Watts Aldous Huxley Allen Ginsberg Amedkar Jayanti American politics American Zen Anaheim Zen Sangha Anglican Annie Besant April Fool Armageddon Art and Religion artificial intellegence Atheist Awakening B R Ambedkar Barlaam & Josaphat Beatnik Between Bhagavad Gita Bible biography birthday bodhisattva Bodhisattva Precepts Book burning Book of Common Prayer Book of Mormon Brahmo Samaj Buddha Buddhism Buddhist Buddhist Lord's Prayer Butterflies Calendars cartoons cat ChatGPT Chicken Tortilla Soup choices Christian atheism Christian mysticism Christian origins Christian Science Christian Zen Christianity Christianity and Buddhism christmas Christmas Truce Christopher Isherwood Church of Later Day Saints Cinco de Mayo circus covenant critical thinking culture D. T. Suzuki Dalit Buddhism Daniel Defoe Desert Fathers and Mothers dharma talk Dogen Donald Trump Dongshan's Five Ranks Dorothy Day dream Duty Easter ecology Edwin Arnold emptiness Empty Moon Zen Network Episcopal Church Eternal Now Ethics evolution existentialism Faith fantasy Fathers Day film film review fire Five Ranks Folk music food Form and emptiness Four Seals Francis of Assisi Francis Xavier Free thinker friendship George MacDonald Gerald Heard Glenn Taylor Webb God Good Friday Gospel of Gospel of Mark Gospel of Thomas grace Graduate Theological Unioin Graduate Theological Union Guanyin H R Blyth Hakuin Ekaku Hanamatsuri Hanukkah Harada Yasutani Zen Heart Sutra Henry David Thoreau Hermann Hesse Hinduism History and Religion history of religion Holy Spirit home Hospitality Icon Ides of March Isaac Newton Islam Islamic mysticism Jack Kerouac James Luther Adams Jiddu Krishnamurti Joan of Arc Johannes Gutenberg John Donne joke Judaism justice karma kensho King James Bible koan Koun Yamada Kyoto School Lewis Carrol Liberal Christianity Liberal Religion Life Plan Community Liminal literature Literature and Religion Liturgy Lord's Prayer Love Mahatma Gandhi Mahayana Martin Luther King Jr Mary Baker Eddy Mary Magdelene Mary Oliver Mayflower Compact Meditation memories memory metaphor money money and religioin Mormons Mother's Day movie review mysticism mythic Neighborhood Unitarian Universalist Church New Thought Nichiren Buddhism Nonduality not knowing Omar Khayyam Pacific School of Religion pagan Palm Sunday Passover peace Pentecost perennialism Phantastes Philip Kapleau philosophy Pilgrimage poetry Poetry and Religion politics Prayer Precepts Printing Press prophecy prophetic spirituality psychology Pure Land Queer religion queering religion Quietism Ram Mohan Roy rebirth recipe Relationships and religion religion religion and history Religious syncretism Resistance Retirement Retreat review Rissho Kosei Kai Ritual Robert Aitken Roshi Robert Ingersoll Rohatsu Romani religion Rosie the Riveter saints samadhi SanboZen Sangha Satyagraha science science and reigion science and religion science fiction seminary sermon Sesshin Sex and Religion Shinran Sikh Sikh tradition silence Social Justice Socially Engaged Buddhism Society and religion Soto Zen soul spiritual community spiritual practice Spirituality Sufism Suicide superstition Taoism Television Teresa of Avila Thanksgiving theological schools Theosophy Thomas Merton Time Transcendentalism Transcendentalist Trinitarian Trinity Uncategorized unitarian Unitarian Christianity Unitarian Universalist Universalism Vajrayana Vedanta Walking war Willa Cather William Ellery Channing wisdom women and religion women in religion World Teacher Writing zazen Zen Zen Center Zen inspired retriement zen meditation Zen Precepts Zen women

Select a Month September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does Revelation say about anyone who adds to the words of the prophecy?

Select your answer to see how you score.

God will add to them the plagues described in this scroll They will be cursed They will be judged They will lose their salvation

Related posts from Monkey Mind

Family

Zen and the Sayings of Jesus

Monkey Mind

Family

Which Is the True Qian? A Koan About...

Monkey Mind

Family

Zen in the Christian Desert

Monkey Mind

Family

Jesuit Zen Roshis, a Roster

Monkey Mind

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Buddhist

'You Can See Everything': A Film Without a...

If you're looking to find the hero in the strange and riveting...

Westminister Abbey-- Part Two

One can get either depressed or impressed by walking around on the...

Theodore Dwight Weld: Evangelical Poster Boy to Drop...

Last time I discussed the spiritual crisis that engulfed Angelina Grimké in...

Jesus and the Law of Moses: An Interview...

It is my pleasure to interview Paul Sloan on his recent book,...

How Does Ặnāvâ Connect Katie Zacharia & Georgia?

This weekend, the big news has been the sudden departure of Trump’s...

The Woman We Remember by Her Wound

Śūrpaṇakhā Had a Heart Desire, humiliation, and the woman behind a turning...

view all Buddhist blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube