Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Buddhist
Whose Facts? A Buddhist Response to Climate Skeptics

Whose Facts? A Buddhist Response to Climate Skeptics

Last updated on: November 1, 2011 at 3:05 pm by James Ford

Whose Facts? A Buddhist Response to Climate Skeptics 2011-11-01T15:05:11-07:00 James Ford

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

One day during meditation, I was contemplating global warming…. With some anguish, I asked Nature this question: ‘Nature, do you think we can rely on you?’ I asked the question because I know that Nature is intelligent, she knows how to react, sometimes violently, to re-establish balance. And I heard the answer in the form of another question: ‘Can I rely on you?’ The question was being put back to me: can Nature rely on humans? And after long, deep breathing, I said ‘Yes, you can mostly rely on me.’ And then I heard Nature’s answer, ‘Yes, you can also mostly rely on me.’ That was a very deep conversation I had with Nature.

This should not be a mere verbal declaration. It should be a deep commitment from everyone, so that Nature can respond in kind. With collective insight we can reconcile with and heal our planet. Each of us can do something in our own daily lives to contribute, to ensure that a future is possible for the next generation.

Thich Nhat Hanh in his Art of Power

The late American senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan once observed how “Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.” It appears he was wrong. For me one of the more distressing problems facing us as human beings at the beginning of the twenty-first century by our common reckoning is how we continue to argue the fact of global warming. For many reasons a substantial part of the American population resists the scientific consensus that our planet is warming at a distressing rate and that it is chiefly caused by human activity.

There are legitimate challenges to the solutions offered by those who have called the world’s attention to this crisis. Many of these solutions offered are draconian while in a world with so many moving parts and therefore of potentially wildly unintended consequences, that no one can guarantee satisfactory, from our human standpoint, outcomes. At the same time making our way through this thicket is very important, critical actually, and requires considerable attention from our scientists and our policy makers. And, I suggest, from the rest of us.

But, that is not where the conversation and challenges tend to lay. Instead we’re still arguing the fact of global warming. Opponents, and there are many of them, attack the science, sometimes aligning with fringe views, sometimes attacking the scientists themselves. For instance the feeding frenzy in some blogging circles and in right wing publications following the revelation of leaked emails to and from scientists associated with the University of East Anglia’s Climate Research Unit late in 2009.

The hostility of the scientists to “climate skeptics” and their unwillingness to cooperate with them, which the emails revealed was much ballyhooed and cited as evidence of falsification of the actual science. However the exoneration of the science itself published by outside investigators in 2010 received considerably less publicity. And, not surprisingly, no reflection from those same bloggers, other than an occasional appeal to conspiracy. And now what blow back from these same sources that will come of the recent allegations that former Vice-president Al Gore groped a masseuse seems fairly obvious: more evidence of falsifying science for those who want such.

I don’t like speculating on the motivations of any individual who chooses to stand as a climate skeptic. But it is necessary to reflect at least a little on the whys of climate skepticism and as I’ll explore the justifications on purely scientific grounds are sufficiently shaky that it seems necessary to look instead to motive. Of course there have to be a few who have actual scientific questions. And I don’t want to minimize this critical function of investigation into the matters of our physical universe. Questioning is the nature of science itself, after all. But those competent to judge this and offer contrary views are in fact very few. And fewer still of those who have the larger picture do argue the facts.

Of those who stand in opposition to the claims of global warming it appears the much larger number resist the science on religious grounds, unwilling to acknowledge human beings as being a part of nature and resisting any assertions that assume we do. Others resist the economic consequences to a wholehearted acceptance of the problem, which can be formidable. But, again, rather than move to that difficult question clutch at any denial of the problem.

And still others, I suspect, fear the power it would take to engage the problem. This resistance to a strong center is an honest stance our American political scene. But, too often, in defense of this smaller government stance, some will go to the same fringe scientists and the same attacks on mainstream scientists used by those who resist modernity and science itself.

The net effect of each of these different groups working against public acknowledgment of the ecological trend and the catastrophe we are facing, and particularly that they have a strong place in the American Republican party means that a serious conversation about how to deal with the issue of global warming at our American governmental level is extraordinarily difficult. Possibly, that conversation is impossible.

But, it need not be. There are voices to be heard coming from many sources that can help us realign our view of our place in the world. Christians and Jews are increasingly offering spiritual views that can help us face the matter at hand. And, of course, there is a Buddhist view. Well, no doubt, several. But, in general there is a way to help us address that first question of fact on the ground, of where we stand in relationship to the world, and how we need to respond to the science that is crying out to all of us of impending disaster.

Thich Nhat Hanh says “We are here to awaken from the illusion of our separateness.” I would unpack that a bit. We are here. And there is no where else to go. We must work out our lives here. And then there is that illusion thing. An unfortunate aspect of our astonishing mental abilities, as I see it a side effect of awareness and the ability to separate and assess is an abiding sense of separation and with it that sense of alienation which Buddhism addresses. The illusion is that we are substantially separate, rather than a perspective within something larger. Whether we are “called” to another view is an open question. Although I would say call doesn’t have to imply a being in the sense of a deity. And in that larger connected sense I do feel we are called out of this sense of separateness.

There is another view, and it is accessible to our human consciousness and it is critical to healing that sense of separateness and alienation, which is a wound in our being, individually and collectively.

And that is we are one.

We are one family. That family is all humans, but it is also every living thing on this planet, and it is the planet itself.

One thing.

Of course this one thing includes all sorts of differences. For one it calls for decisions and actions. We support this, we do not that. To do this calls for reason and acceptance we’re part of the whole thing.

Another point is how we arise out of various conditions. And when those conditions change we will pass away. So, a very important point is that we all will die. Nothing we do will prevent death coming eventually, for the good, the bad, and everything in between. The sun rises on all of us. And it sets on all of us.

Sobering, but a necessary corrective to many possible choices that would follow believing we have some sort of escape.

And, at the very same time that good news: here we are one thing.

And I think there is a deep call, ah that call thing again, for us to see into the many ways in which we are connected.

One of which is our ecological connection. In fact one way of looking at a Buddhist view is an ecological consciousness.

We are intertwined, completely, inseparably. And which is understood in many ways, but one critical way is that we are all joined in the natural world and need to look at things from that perspective. The best gift of the human mind to that perspective, I suggest, is the scientific method. Not the only way of seeing, but critical. And as a Buddhist, I see not accepting the gift of scientific method as part of the bag of tricks of being human inconceivable.

That is a fact we deny at our peril.

And, so, I hope anyone who sees the wisdom of Buddhism will eschew the denial of the basic science as presented by overwhelming scientific consensus and acknowledge the fact of global warming and that it is largely caused by us.

Then we can sort out what are the best ways of engaging the crisis.

What to do is an open question. I think there is much to worry about, and there are consequences to all decisions.

Now, among the Buddhist responses that make the most sense to me are those found at Ecological Buddhism: A Buddhist Response to Global Warming.

But, right at the beginning, what we need is to see the fact on the ground.

We are intertwined as one thing.

And that one thing is in considerable danger.

And we need to act.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

July 11, 2010

Agnes on the Relative Merits of Received Wisdoms

Next Post

July 13, 2010 Turn, turn, turn...

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category A Christmas Carol Abolitionist African-American Ahmadiyya Alan Watts Aldous Huxley Allen Ginsberg Amedkar Jayanti American politics American Zen Anaheim Zen Sangha Anglican Annie Besant April Fool Armageddon Art and Religion artificial intellegence Atheist Awakening B R Ambedkar Barlaam & Josaphat Beatnik Between Bhagavad Gita Bible biography birthday bodhisattva Bodhisattva Precepts Book burning Book of Common Prayer Book of Mormon Brahmo Samaj Buddha Buddhism Buddhist Buddhist Lord's Prayer Butterflies Calendars cartoons cat ChatGPT Chicken Tortilla Soup choices Christian atheism Christian mysticism Christian origins Christian Science Christian Zen Christianity Christianity and Buddhism christmas Christmas Truce Christopher Isherwood Church of Later Day Saints Cinco de Mayo circus covenant critical thinking culture D. T. Suzuki Dalit Buddhism Daniel Defoe Desert Fathers and Mothers dharma talk Dogen Donald Trump Dongshan's Five Ranks Dorothy Day dream Duty Easter ecology Edwin Arnold emptiness Empty Moon Zen Network Episcopal Church Eternal Now Ethics evolution existentialism Faith fantasy Fathers Day film film review fire Five Ranks Folk music food Form and emptiness Four Seals Francis of Assisi Francis Xavier Free thinker friendship George MacDonald Gerald Heard Glenn Taylor Webb God Good Friday Gospel of Gospel of Mark Gospel of Thomas grace Graduate Theological Unioin Graduate Theological Union Guanyin H R Blyth Hakuin Ekaku Hanamatsuri Hanukkah Harada Yasutani Zen Heart Sutra Henry David Thoreau Hermann Hesse Hinduism History and Religion history of religion Holy Spirit home Hospitality Icon Ides of March Isaac Newton Islam Islamic mysticism Jack Kerouac James Luther Adams Jiddu Krishnamurti Joan of Arc Johannes Gutenberg John Donne joke Judaism justice karma kensho King James Bible koan Koun Yamada Kyoto School Lewis Carrol Liberal Christianity Liberal Religion Life Plan Community Liminal literature Literature and Religion Liturgy Lord's Prayer Love Mahatma Gandhi Mahayana Martin Luther King Jr Mary Baker Eddy Mary Magdelene Mary Oliver Mayflower Compact Meditation memories memory metaphor money money and religioin Mormons Mother's Day movie review mysticism mythic Neighborhood Unitarian Universalist Church New Thought Nichiren Buddhism Nonduality not knowing Omar Khayyam Pacific School of Religion pagan Palm Sunday Passover peace Pentecost perennialism Phantastes Philip Kapleau philosophy Pilgrimage poetry Poetry and Religion politics Prayer Precepts Printing Press prophecy prophetic spirituality psychology Pure Land Queer religion queering religion Quietism Ram Mohan Roy rebirth recipe Relationships and religion religion religion and history Religious syncretism Resistance Retirement Retreat review Rissho Kosei Kai Ritual Robert Aitken Roshi Robert Ingersoll Rohatsu Romani religion Rosie the Riveter saints samadhi SanboZen Sangha Satyagraha science science and reigion science and religion science fiction seminary sermon Sesshin Sex and Religion Shinran Sikh Sikh tradition silence Social Justice Socially Engaged Buddhism Society and religion Soto Zen soul spiritual community spiritual practice Spirituality Sufism Suicide superstition Taoism Television Teresa of Avila Thanksgiving theological schools Theosophy Thomas Merton Time Transcendentalism Transcendentalist Trinitarian Trinity Uncategorized unitarian Unitarian Christianity Unitarian Universalist Universalism Vajrayana Vedanta Walking war Willa Cather William Ellery Channing wisdom women and religion women in religion World Teacher Writing zazen Zen Zen Center Zen inspired retriement zen meditation Zen Precepts Zen women

Select a Month September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who threw Daniel into the lion’s den?

Select your answer to see how you score.

King Saul King Darius Pharaoh King Nebuchadnezzar