Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Buddhist
How to Have a Good Next Life

How to Have a Good Next Life

Last updated on: November 1, 2011 at 3:14 pm by James Ford

How to Have a Good Next Life 2011-11-01T15:14:19-07:00 James Ford

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

HOW TO HAVE A GOOD NEXT LIFE
Seven Resolutions for a New Year

James Ishmael Ford

30 December 2007
First Unitarian Society
West Newton, Massachusetts

Text

Christ has no body now but yours, No hands, no feet, on earth but yours. Yours are the eyes through which He looks Compassion on this world Yours are the feet With which He walks to do good. Your are the hands With which He blesses all the world Yours are the hands, yours are the feet. Yours are the eyes, you are His body. Christ has no body now but yours, No hands, no feet on earth but yours Yours are the eyes, through which He Looks compassion on the world. Christ has no body now on earth but yours.

Teresa of Avila

With all the grace worthy of George Orwell’s dystopian fantasies, this year the State Administration for Religious Affairs of the People’s Republic of China issued Order No. 5 which outlines the procedures Tibetan Buddhists must follow if they want to have a tulku, that is a reincarnated lama, officially recognized. Not to put too fine a point on it this means if you want to reincarnate in China you need a government permit. Among the more cynical there is a suspicion the Chinese government is mostly concerned with how and where the Dalai Lama may choose to reincarnate upon his death, and who will control the new incarnation’s, how shall we call it, education.

For me this comes to mind in the context of the turning year. In two days 2007 is gone and 2008 is born. On the one hand this time is an accident of history, an arbitrary moment distinguished from any other moment by capricious fate through the calculations of clerics many, many years ago, based upon what frankly was bad data. That said, there is another hand: this is a time marked in our hearts, whatever its origins, which speaks to something true.

Here we are, faced with the great archetype of change. The only event more dramatic for the imagination is death itself. At this time of year I, for one, find it difficult not to think of birth and death and what next, whether there are bureaucratic forms to fill out (which must be evidence of a hell), or something else, all sorts of something else’s. My imagination is on fire. Here, now, all those stories of ancient times, of death and renewal bubble just beneath the surface. Here our ancestors whispered the stories of what might come next to their children. In time those children did the same with theirs. Down to us. In some cultures the stories are of heaven and hell. In others the stories are of continuous rebirths. Most all the stories speak to our connections, of how our past and our future are joined, meeting right here in this moment.

I’m particularly taken with that image of Janus; the god of passages, with his two faces looking back and forward at the same time, and the richness that conveys. Herman Hesse, a hero of my youth wrote of this experience, I feel, in his novel Siddhartha when he described how at a special moment the protagonist of the story “saw all these forms and faces in a thousand relationships become newly born. Each one was mortal, a passionate, painful example of all that is transitory. Yet none of them died, they only changed, were always reborn, continually had a new face: only time stood between one face and another.” I suggest we are each of us invited at this time to see this for ourselves.

Now I’m not terribly taken with literal visions of rebirth into some new place. The brain science, as I’m aware of it, doesn’t give me much hope for our personalities separating from our bodies. However, there is an invitation here, I feel. Along with the question of a creator God, the question of what happens after death ultimately belongs to the realm of “I don’t know.” Everyone’s opinion on this subject is an opinion. Perhaps the Chinese government will be diligent about this as temples apply for approval of their new tulkus. But, here’s a more important point. I want to suggest this not knowing itself is something most intimate. I suggest confronting the reality of death in its literal sense with relentless honesty takes us to a magical realm, a most amazing place, pregnant with dream and possibility. I’ll return to this for a bit, later.

And there’s another sense of this encounter that is equally important for us. What I find more important for our purposes today, what I find most important to think about, is whatever else might be true, how we also really are reborn with every breath. The multiplicities of who we are are constantly being revealed in new and mysterious ways. We are the children of change. Therefore, perhaps, most important, is to notice how our choices in this moment will indeed result in who we will be in the next. And with each New Year, our ancestors call us to reflect on this and what it can mean. This is something wonderful. I find this opportunity to change simply miraculous.

Which brings me to the idea of New Year’s resolutions, and how important they can be in helping us shape our next lives within this life. This, right here, is a moment in time where we are invited to stop and reflect and to commit to the shaping of new life, of new possibility.
In this context I find it helpful to reflect on various moral codes like the biblical Ten Commandments and the Buddhist Five Precepts. I believe they are best attempts of our ancestors to describe how to facilitate the best next life. I find how as I consider the calls to a moral life given by our ancestors I, and maybe we can inform a healthy and holy life for the future. Now the process demands attention and some critical assessments. We need to factor for time and place. We need to recall how things get mixed up, and some assumptions such as “purity codes” need to be weighed carefully and not swallowed whole. But by applying a “liberal” perspective, critical and engaged while at the same time open and welcoming, I think we can find much of value.

As an example today I’d like to reflect a little on a code you might not be familiar with, which I find reveals the whole thing, including deep wisdom and the need for careful parsing. While rummaging around the Web I came across a number of references to something called the Seven Laws of Noah or the Noahide code or covenant or commandments. They’re a set of rules for life put together, near as I can tell by Talmudic scholars inspired by Genesis, chapter nine, verses four through seventeen. I won’t quote the text here other than to note it took some serious creativity to find these seven laws in that bit of scripture. However tenuous their origins what the rabbis came up with as the rules written on our human hearts I find pretty compelling. In Jewish tradition they’re the rules God gives following the flood, and are considered the basic rules for all of humanity of whatever or no religious perspective, who wish to find the true rhythms of the human heart and a harmonious life in this world.

It turns out they are very popular with the Chabad movement and you can find several websites addressing the subject. It also turns out they’re of concern to the conspiracy minded, some of whom think they’re going to be the basis for the New World Order’s legal structures with a subtext of how the Noahide commandment against idolatry is intended to get rid of Christianity. I find it fascinating what knots the human heart can tie itself into when in the thrall of greed, hatred or various certainties.

The code is actually very interesting, and I believe, helpful for us to contemplate as we consider how to meet the New Year. I’ve found the ordering a bit different in different lists, but that doesn’t appear to be very important. They are in their more literalist form six don’ts, “don’t worship idols,” “don’t murder,” “don’t steal,” “don’t commit adultery,” “don’t blaspheme,” “don’t eat the flesh of living animals,” and one positive injunction “create a judicial system.”

If they’re worked a bit with that liberal heart, imaginatively, critically and creatively engaged, I think they can be amazingly useful. And they’ve become the basis for my New Year’s Resolutions. Perhaps you’ll find them helpful pointers, as well. Let me try to unpack them a bit and see if you wouldn’t agree.

First “don’t worship idols.” Personally, I don’t feel the need to destroy holy pictures or tear down statues. Frankly, I like our stained glass windows, and the angels here in the sanctuary that I understand my predecessor Gerry Krick liked to call the “flight crew.” I think of them and other sacred images in the sense that Orthodox Christians understand icons, as windows to heaven. I think this commandment is about something else. I find this a profound spiritual challenge to question all authority, a call to that profound “don’t know” I spoke of earlier. I suspect a good rule of thumb is to always question whether I’m making something into the supreme God of all. At the core of this the authority I’m most wary of is the one called “me.” This, I feel, is a call to the depths of the “don’t know.” So my first New Year’s resolution is to question all authority, particularly mine.

Second is “don’t murder.” Now that’s a bit easier, but only if we use the more narrow definition of don’t do any unlawful killing of fellow human beings. But what if the meaning of this commandment is more radical, more spiritual; is don’t kill? That makes it impossible and calls me to account for every step I take, for every bite of food I eat. My commitment this year, my second New Year’s Resolution, is to see how my very life depends upon the destruction of other forms of life. I suspect this is a call to caution, to hesitation, to gratitude.

Third is “do not steal.” What are the boundaries of my life? Really? What is mine and what is yours? Is this, as some political philosophies would have it, to mean “don’t tax me, what is mine is mine?” Or, does it have another sense of respect for boundaries however tenuous and passing they may be, and holding things with love and respect? Is it a call to respect for everything within its passingness? Well, that’s what I commit to try and do this year as my third New Year’s Resolution.

Fourth is “do not commit adultery.” Good enough. It is, of course, important to honor our covenants with each other. But here I feel a deeper possibility of creative engagement as well, where this is really about understanding who we are as sexual beings, seeing that our very sexuality is heaven-sent, and that honoring who we are as we are is essential to our living holy lives. And that project is my fourth New Year’s resolution.

Fifth, “don’t blaspheme.” As a modern what does this mean? Does it mean eliminating “god” and “damn” from conventional conversation? Perhaps. That would be an interesting spiritual discipline for those of us brought up after the Second World War where potty mouth has become the coin of the realm. But, again, I think a liberal perspective is particularly useful. What would it be like if I only spoke with respect for the world and all within it? Could I even do that? As I think of our current Federal government, I see how hard this would be for me. But, again, for the sake of my next life this next year, I’m going to explore this as my fifth New Year’s resolution.

Sixth, that “not eating the flesh of living animals.” I don’t really think this means I shouldn’t eat raw oysters, although it might. Still, I think the liberal and deeper meaning is a call to respect the life of the world, to hold up the natural world as heaven itself, and to act as if that statement were the truest true. Now that’s an interesting discipline I’m going to try and hold myself to as my sixth New Year’s resolution.

And last, number seven, the literal form is “establish a judicial system.” The other rules are framed negatively, even though it’s pretty obvious what their positive attributes are. This one says flat out: do something. It seems so obvious to me that this is a call to work for justice. What a lovely thing. Here the rubber hits the road, here the ideal and the actual join like that proverbial box and its lid. Here we find completion, the meeting of heaven and earth, and without a doubt rebirth into the Western paradise. And that work is my seventh resolution.

Well, those are my New Year’s resolutions. What about you? Where do you hope to be reborn this coming year? Where will your choices, thoughts and actions take you? By the bye, you don’t need a government permit to do any of this. The choice really is in your own hands. And that, my friends, is something I find to be good news, really good news.

Amen.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

December 29, 2007

A Gentle Reminder

Next Post

December 30, 2007 Charlie Wilson's War

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category A Christmas Carol Abolitionist African-American Ahmadiyya Alan Watts Aldous Huxley Allen Ginsberg Amedkar Jayanti American politics American Zen Anaheim Zen Sangha Anglican Annie Besant April Fool Armageddon Art and Religion artificial intellegence Atheist Awakening B R Ambedkar Barlaam & Josaphat Beatnik Between Bhagavad Gita Bible biography birthday bodhisattva Bodhisattva Precepts Book burning Book of Common Prayer Book of Mormon Brahmo Samaj Buddha Buddhism Buddhist Buddhist Lord's Prayer Butterflies Calendars cartoons cat ChatGPT Chicken Tortilla Soup choices Christian atheism Christian mysticism Christian origins Christian Science Christian Zen Christianity Christianity and Buddhism christmas Christmas Truce Christopher Isherwood Church of Later Day Saints Cinco de Mayo circus covenant critical thinking culture D. T. Suzuki Dalit Buddhism Daniel Defoe Desert Fathers and Mothers dharma talk Dogen Donald Trump Dongshan's Five Ranks Dorothy Day dream Duty Easter ecology Edwin Arnold emptiness Empty Moon Zen Network Episcopal Church Eternal Now Ethics evolution existentialism Faith fantasy Fathers Day film film review fire Five Ranks Folk music food Form and emptiness Four Seals Francis of Assisi Francis Xavier Free thinker friendship George MacDonald Gerald Heard Glenn Taylor Webb God Good Friday Gospel of Gospel of Mark Gospel of Thomas grace Graduate Theological Unioin Graduate Theological Union Guanyin H R Blyth Hakuin Ekaku Hanamatsuri Hanukkah Harada Yasutani Zen Heart Sutra Henry David Thoreau Hermann Hesse Hinduism History and Religion history of religion Holy Spirit home Hospitality Icon Ides of March Isaac Newton Islam Islamic mysticism Jack Kerouac James Luther Adams Jiddu Krishnamurti Joan of Arc Johannes Gutenberg John Donne joke Judaism justice karma kensho King James Bible koan Koun Yamada Kyoto School Lewis Carrol Liberal Christianity Liberal Religion Life Plan Community Liminal literature Literature and Religion Liturgy Lord's Prayer Love Mahatma Gandhi Mahayana Martin Luther King Jr Mary Baker Eddy Mary Magdelene Mary Oliver Mayflower Compact Meditation memories memory metaphor money money and religioin Mormons Mother's Day movie review mysticism mythic Neighborhood Unitarian Universalist Church New Thought Nichiren Buddhism Nonduality not knowing Omar Khayyam Pacific School of Religion pagan Palm Sunday Passover peace Pentecost perennialism Phantastes Philip Kapleau philosophy Pilgrimage poetry Poetry and Religion politics Prayer Precepts Printing Press prophecy prophetic spirituality psychology Pure Land Queer religion queering religion Quietism Ram Mohan Roy rebirth recipe Relationships and religion religion religion and history Religious syncretism Resistance Retirement Retreat review Rissho Kosei Kai Ritual Robert Aitken Roshi Robert Ingersoll Rohatsu Romani religion Rosie the Riveter saints samadhi SanboZen Sangha Satyagraha science science and reigion science and religion science fiction seminary sermon Sesshin Sex and Religion Shinran Sikh Sikh tradition silence Social Justice Socially Engaged Buddhism Society and religion Soto Zen soul spiritual community spiritual practice Spirituality Sufism Suicide superstition Taoism Television Teresa of Avila Thanksgiving theological schools Theosophy Thomas Merton Time Transcendentalism Transcendentalist Trinitarian Trinity Uncategorized unitarian Unitarian Christianity Unitarian Universalist Universalism Vajrayana Vedanta Walking war Willa Cather William Ellery Channing wisdom women and religion women in religion World Teacher Writing zazen Zen Zen Center Zen inspired retriement zen meditation Zen Precepts Zen women

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who warned "the tongue is a fire"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

John James Peter Paul