Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Muslimah Media Watch

Home
Muslim
Religion News
Hijab-Gate, Literally

Hijab-Gate, Literally

Last updated on: March 3, 2010 at 12:00 am by Lara Alamad

Hijab-Gate, Literally 2010-03-03T00:00:37-04:00 Lara Alamad

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

There are certain stories newspapers here in the U.K. love. Anything that can be classed as “a waste of taxpayer’s money” is guaranteed to find its way into print, even more so if it involves something “frivolous” like artwork. And, as has been noticed previously at MMW, the media also has a fascination with Muslim women’s clothing.

So if there is a story that combines both these fixations, it’s bound to generate a lot of print.

A mock-up of how the Hijab Gate will look. Image via Daily Express website.

Tower Hamlets Council has recently put forward a proposal to build two “Hijab Gates” (pictured at left) at either end of Brick Lane (also known as “Banglatown”). The gates will cost £1.85 million to build, all of which will come from public funds. “Hijab-gate,” anyone?*

In such difficult economic times, it is expected that such expenditure be questioned. However, looking at the media reports, it would appear that money isn’t the biggest issue. Even the aesthetics of the design are not the main cause of controversy.

What is really causing consternation is the choice of Muslim symbol, even in an area with a sizable Muslim population. The Daily Express thunders that such plans are “Pandering to Islam.” Note the usage of the word Islam rather than Muslims–all the better to give the impression of a monolithic entity.

But Tower Hamlets Council is quoted in this piece and others as stating that the headscarf is not solely a Muslim garment but one worn by many different communities.
Next we hear from broadcaster John Nicolson. He is in the piece to supply the other trope much beloved by journalists, that of Muslims being given/seeking preferential treatment to other religious groups:

“They’d never dream of crucifix-inspired gates, nor should they, so why an arch that is Islamic and representing a specifically conservative form of Islam?”

Actually, a pedantic person could claim that the so-called “Hijab Gates” look more like the bandanas worn by some Plymouth Brethren women, but that’s not nearly as juicy as a “Muslims try to take over everything, everywhere” story.

On to the Daily Mail, with includes the phrase “waste of taxpayer’s money” within the headline. It also accuses the project of being “culturally insensitive.” However from the article itself, it’s not actually clear who the project is insensitive to. Firstly, we have the modern artist Tracy Emin decrying that taxpayer’s money could be better spent, which is ironic considering, that she recently proclaimed she would move to France if U.K. tax levels increased.

Next, some criticism of the hijab as a public sculpture, according to local artist Brad Lochore, using a hijab is giving a wrong sign because it means “repression and domination” and “territorialization for one minority group.”

Any chance of a Muslim point of view? No, instead we hear from local resident and chair of Save Britain’s Heritage, Will Palin, who claims the Hijab Gates are unrepresentative of the area’s diversity.

The Daily Telegraph piece probes the issues of cultural insensitivity further. The writer, James Hall, declares that it is wrong for a symbol so closely associated with Bangladeshi Muslims to be used, because Brick Lane is more than just curry houses (inferring that all Bangladeshis can produce is food). To him, hipster vintage shops and locations associated with East End gangsters are far more interesting and worthy of cultural celebration.

All three of these newspapers could be described as politically and socially conservative. Would a more left wing newspaper provide a more nuanced approach? Would it actually bother interviewing any Muslims?

Well, yes it did, but it didn’t actually bother naming them. Tracy Emin, John Nicolson and Will Palin are all quoted and named in The Guardian’s piece, as is Sammy Minzly, a bagel shop owner. The two Muslim women interviewed, both of whom are critical of the plan, describing it as pushing a stereotypical version of Islam and creating tension. They are referred to as “a local Muslim woman” and “Another, a headscarf wearer.”

To not even name the Muslim women just smacks of a lazy Appeal to Melanin, rather then any real concern for what Muslims think. The mere use of the terminology “a headscarf wearer” is so dehumanizing, it is unbelievable that a supposedly politically correct publication could think of using it.

So far I’ve discussed what has been said in all four articles. However, the real issues is not the words on the page, but what they imply, which is that Muslim symbols and public displays of Muslim identity are bad and provocative, even in an area with a large Muslim population. Muslims can provide some background color in the name of diversity and cook nice food for others to eat, but move out of those boundaries and howls of protest will ensue. Muslims cannot celebrate their culture without being accused of imposing it on others. Muslims and Muslim culture can never been seen as positive or even benign—we’re always portrayed as a threat to the established order.

*Editor’s Note: For readers not familiar with 1970s U.S. political history, “-gate” is a suffix used to denote a political scandal. Its use originated with the Watergate scandal during the Nixon administration.

Previous Post

March 2, 2010

She's (not) a Super Freak

Next Post

March 4, 2010 Fashion Statements

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Advertisements Art/Theater Books/Magazines Cinema Comics/Cartoons Culture/Society Events Fashion Film Friday Links Merchandise/Commodities MMW Announcements MMW Highlights Music/Radio News Photography Politics Profile Ramadan 2012 Ramadan 2013 Ramadan 2014 Ramadan 2015 Roundtable Satire Social Media Sports Technology/Science Television Uncategorized Video Web

Select a Month November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does 2 Peter say will come like a thief?

Select your answer to see how you score.

The end Judgment The Spirit The day of the Lord