Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Muslimah Media Watch

Home
Muslim
Religion News
Unveiled: Hollywood’s Orientalist Fantasy

Unveiled: Hollywood’s Orientalist Fantasy

Last updated on: December 8, 2011 at 11:34 pm by Muslimah Media Watch

Unveiled: Hollywood’s Orientalist Fantasy 2011-12-08T23:34:11-04:00 Muslimah Media Watch

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Guess what? Hollywood is making a film with a female Muslim protagonist! Yes, that’s right. A female Muslim protagonist. The main character in the film is a Muslim woman. For the first time. And what is the name of the film, you may ask? Guess. Just take a quick guess. What’s that? Did you say the word ‘veil’? Very close! It’s called Unveiled. Is that a surprise? Well, the fact that the film’s main character is a Muslim woman may be, but the name, not so much, considering the main character is a Muslim woman.

As the projected release date of the film is December of 2009, information on the film is scant. From what I’ve been able to gather from a few sites, it seems the main character is a Middle Eastern woman, who, after finding her life in danger, takes on the identity of a dead friend and leaves the Middle East for the U.S. That’s the most thorough synopsis I’ve been able to find. From a few other sites, I’ve also gathered that the film is part thriller, part psychological drama, part film noir, and that the reason she leaves the Middle East is to meet an American lover, who she has along with two husbands.

The film is directed by Bill Bannerman, Clint Eastwood’s assistant director on many films, but for whom Unveiled will be his directorial debut. In Bannerman’s own words, the film’s description:

“Behind the dark burqa lies a sexy, manipulative victim who is dangerous, as well as in grave danger.”

So many things wrong with that quote. Let’s break it down.

1. Burqa? I thought she was Middle Eastern. Women in the Middle East don’t wear the burqa. South Asian/Afghan women do. So culturally inappropriate.

2. A sexy woman victim behind the ‘burqa’ takes us back to the Orientalist fantasy. The ‘other’ being created first by placing her inside a foreign garment. The ‘other’ then being exoticised to titillate the Western eye (or other body parts). The ‘other’ being a helpless victim whom the Western viewer of the film will feel the need to rescue, because only he/she can.

3. Dangerous – in this world of hostility toward Muslims, do we still need to portray Muslims as dangerous?

So who is the actress who will play the Middle Eastern protagonist? Hindi film actress Mallika Sherawat, (pictured left), Hindi cinema’s sex symbol. Why did Bannerman choose her? Because he wanted someone from the Middle East or South Asia who could “understand the character of a Muslim woman from the Middle East and lend a degree of authenticity in terms of accent, body language, knowledge of customs among other features.”

Middle Eastern and South Asian cultures are very different and not everyone in those cultures is Muslim. Not everyone can understand the Muslim “culture”, authentically. Especially when there is no one Muslim culture. Bannerman, by saying that he needed someone who already understood the Muslim “culture,” is conflating many issues into one. He is first assuming there is one Muslim culture. Then he is assuming that all cultures in the East are the same. Then he is saying that if someone is from the East, somewhere, they will all understand and know each other. What he seems to be saying is if you’re from “over there” you must all be the same. Middle East, South Asia, Muslim, or non, you’re all the same. You all have the same culture. After all, that is why an Indian woman would have knowledge of Middle Eastern culture.

Interestingly, Mallika was made to wear a burqa in her audition. I’m not sure how this would effect the way she performed. Also, not sure what to make of this, other than the culturally inaccurate use of the burqa in this film. Or perhaps a veil fetish, discussed below. Anyhow…

What does Mallika think of the film?

“It’s a fantastic story – part thriller, part psychological drama, part film noir… It was so fast paced and exciting and so well written, I couldn’t put it down for a second,” said Mallika.

“And the icing on the cake was that it’s a story from the point of view of a woman — a woman who has relationships with three men from different continents, and she goes from an ultra-traditional Muslim environment to an ultra-liberal Western one. This is a script I could never say no to,” she added.

Additionally, she has said

“She is not a shadow behind the burqa and she is very sexy.”

The assumption again is that a woman in a burqa is nothing but a shadow, a mere silhouette of who she really is. Additionally, all this allusion to the sexiness of the character alludes to a veil fetish of sorts, something which Asra Nomani explains well. Even more so with the choice of Mallika to play the Muslim woman. A woman known for her provocative clothing and scenes, (as her pictures attest to – not all safe-for-work) adds additional titillation as one knows that a sexy and alluring body exists under that burqa. I cannot help but wonder if this was a conscious choice on the part of Bannerman. Even though most Western audiences would not be familiar with her initially, that may not be for long.

Without having seen the film, it is honestly difficult to place this comment. We do not know how the ultra-traditional Muslim environment will be portrayed nor do we know how the ultra-liberal Western one will play out on screen. We do not know how the two will be contrasted. However, I’m still going to make some educated guesses. From this tagline – “Silenced by Tradition…Deadly by Choice” – it would seem that the ultra-traditional Muslim, and might I add, Eastern, environment will be portrayed as silencing and thus oppressive. An environment in which women are not supposed to be individual people who are able to voice their opinion or choose their own life. This will be depicted as the average and normal environment for all Muslim women. It will be shown as the common situation for ALL Muslim women. All Eastern/Muslim/traditional values will be shown as oppressive and suffocating. The Muslim body will be oppressed and denied, longing for something better, something Western. The West, in contrast, will be shown as liberating; one in which people are free to choose their own life. It will be shown as a beacon of opportunities to those poor disadvantaged Eastern folk. The West will be a place to express oneself as one wishes. The Western body will be one of saviour. It is in the West that the Muslim woman will be able to unveil her oppressive Eastern identity and reveal her sexy and exotic Eastern body, for the pleasure of the Western eye. But that’s just my guess.

We’ll see when the film is released. Expect a full critique then.

Previous Post

September 16, 2008

Shabana Azmi plays Devil's advocate

Next Post

September 19, 2008 Friday Links -- September 19, 2008

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Advertisements Art/Theater Books/Magazines Cinema Comics/Cartoons Culture/Society Events Fashion Film Friday Links Merchandise/Commodities MMW Announcements MMW Highlights Music/Radio News Photography Politics Profile Ramadan 2012 Ramadan 2013 Ramadan 2014 Ramadan 2015 Roundtable Satire Social Media Sports Technology/Science Television Uncategorized Video Web

Select a Month November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What year was the King James Bible first published?

Select your answer to see how you score.

1701 1517 1611 1492