We’re Just In It for the Money

Last updated on: August 4, 2022 at 8:17 pm by Jennifer Woodruff Tait

We’re Just In It for the Money 2022-08-04T20:17:47-05:00 Jennifer Woodruff Tait

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Long ago, I was a college student (here.)

We had an humanities program called Presidential Scholars. (We all, from the greatest to the smallest, called it “PreSchool” as a nickname, which leads me to occasionally make alarming statements to my husband now such as “When I was reading Nietzsche in preschool….”) It was everything you’d want such an honors program to be, or at least would have wanted it to be in the late 1980s. It was a two-year sequence of courses, all team-taught, organized not by chronology or discipline but around the great questions of life as considered by the Western canon (let me add that this canon was very broadly conceived and by no means all dead white guys). In our junior year, we capped it off with a course about a non-Western culture (Japan in my year – I first read the Tale of Genji there.)

The courses on “Suffering, Death, and Endurance” and “Community and Covenant” in particular changed my life. But they were all marvelous. We put Socrates and Stephen Hawking in conversation with each other. I read Elie Wiesel, Hildegard of Bingen, Alice Walker, Benedict’s Rule – life-changing encounters, each one. I am not exaggerating to say that my last three decades of life have been unutterably different because of those classes.

But. (You knew there was a but.)

This humanities program was not an opt-in for those who might choose to go through this liberal arts education on steroids. Everyone who got the highest level of scholarship offers from the school was enrolled in the course – whether they were in humanities or scientific fields. English majors, biology majors, pre-med, music performance, theater, Spanish, psychology, geology – it did not matter. Augie has always been a school that was clear about its liberal arts mission, and so here was an attempt to truly infuse liberal arts thinking throughout the curriculum and bring different disciplines in contact with each other. Right. Right?

Well, two of my classmates – my memory says they were a psychology and pre-pharmacy major, but memory may be faulty – decided it would be funny to get a shirt printed that said exactly what they thought of this idea: “We’re Just In It for the Money.” (This was the late 1980s. It was a lot harder to get messages printed on shirts. You had to really want to.) Humanities are all well and good, but scholarships are the tickets to degrees and careers, right? (See photos.)

They printed them off, sold them inexpensively to all of us, and got in profound trouble. A few years after I graduated, Augie decoupled the scholarships from the humanities program. You can still get a Presidential Scholarship at Augie, but no one makes you think about Benedict’s Rule while you do.

Today I pulled the shirt out of the closet (I’m a historian, I have my 34-year-old shirts nicely preserved), put it on, remembered this, and thought of an excellent recent blog post by Chris Gehrz, the Pietist Schoolman, about St. Mary’s University in Minnesota phasing out its liberal arts majors while still saying it was a liberal arts school. (I also thought of the memorable moment 12 years ago when my husband was a professor at Huntington University and I posted on Facebook: If I hear one more tour guide come in the door downstairs and begin their spiel: “This is Loew-Brenn Hall. Huntington is a liberal arts college. In this building we have religion, history, English, psychology, social work, and education,” I swear I’m going to lean over the balcony and ask them if they’ve ever heard the term “social science.” But I digress).

Now, despite the failure of this noble experiment, Augie is and remains a liberal arts school. Unlike St. Mary’s, it has not cut its liberal arts majors. (You can even major in Scandinavian studies. Long story.) In all honesty, the alums I keep in touch with, or see on Zoom events, or get interviewed in the alumni magazine, appear to have thought deeply about the questions of life Gehrz proposes – even if they are geologists or accountants or pharmacists or psychologists. All stories are complicated. So is this one.

I guess that’s my point, actually. The contemplation of the great questions of life and the need to make a living are intertwined in inexplicably complicated ways. Always have been. Making a living does not mean making a killing, though the two get mixed up a lot; and the liberal arts shouldn’t just be a privilege of the elite, but they often have been. What all of this means is twofold. First, we badly need to solve the problem of the divorce between ends and means in education – a problem that didn’t arise overnight. And secondly, doing so will be a lot harder than we think.

Images: Unsplash, and me.

General Christian

Education and Religion

Business, Finance and Religion

Previous Post

July 17, 2022

Zumba Epiphany

Next Post

September 5, 2022 From His Own Fullness All He Takes Away

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Art Audio posts Bible and Work Book Review Books Budgeting Calling Common Good Community Development Conferences Discipleship Economics Entrepreneurship Ethics Faith and Family Faith and the Marketplace Faith and the Workplace faith and work History of Work and Vocation Leadership Local Church Meaning New Blogger News Prayer Relationships Seminaries Theology of Work Uncategorized Video posts Vocation Worship Resources

Select a Month April 2026 October 2025 September 2025 July 2025 April 2025 January 2025 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 May 2024 March 2024 February 2024 December 2023 November 2023 August 2023 July 2023 April 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 May 2022 April 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 June 2021 May 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 January 2020 December 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 April 2018 March 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

True or False: Daniel interpreted King Nebuchadnezzar's dream about a statue made of different metals.

Select your answer to see how you score.

TRUE FALSE