Was Jesus a socialist? More from #ActonU

Last updated on: August 5, 2015 at 1:35 pm by Edwin Woodruff Tait

Was Jesus a socialist? More from #ActonU 2015-08-05T13:35:32-05:00 Edwin Woodruff Tait

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

A lot depends, of course, on just how “free market economics” is articulated and in what social and moral context it is placed. Jennifer Roback Morse’s “foundational” talk emphasized that at Acton, free market economics is ordered by Christian virtue. She had critical words for the idea that the consumer is always right and that the market should never be regulated by any standard beyond itself. For instance, she raised the question whether it ought to be legal to buy and sell babies in a free market.

Morse is heavily involved in activism on family, marriage, and sexual morality issues, and understands any form of surrogate parenting, buying sperm, etc., to be effectively a form of child-selling. (At least that’s my impression.) And this example illustrates a broader point–that people at Acton are typically most willing to endorse limits on capitalism when they conflict with social conservatism. Morse, due to her activism in these areas, is particularly sensitive to the ways in which a totally free market can undermine the family and traditional morality, but it’s a theme I heard more than once.

On the other hand, Lawrence Reed’s lecture on Austrian economics and Jeffrey Tucker’s on technology displayed a much more optimistic and much less restrained attitude to the market. Tucker, for instance, spoke of the market as a “wise teacher” at whose feet we should sit. Reed, president of the Foundation for Economic Education, handed out a booklet he had written called “Rendering unto Caesar: Was Jesus a Socialist?”

This pamphlet makes the standard right-libertarian argument that “redistributive” taxation is theft and that Jesus would favor only voluntary means of helping the poor. Its arguments strike me as unconvincing attacks on straw men and don’t deal with the fundamental questions. For instance, Reed says that Jesus’ statement “render to Caesar” assumes private property and leaves open the question of what belongs to Caesar. But the coin Jesus was showed presumably belonged to one of the Jews Jesus was talking to. Jesus seems to assume that the coin belongs to Caesar just because it is a coin. Now that may well be a simplistic way to read the story, but Reed’s booklet doesn’t move the conversation deeper than that.

The lecture itself was a helpful introduction to “Austrian” economics. In particular, Reed stressed that the Austrian school is “methodologically individualistic.” That is to say, Austrians focus on how individuals make economic decisions rather than on large population blocs or abstract market forces. One of the other attendees asked whether this implied a radical philosophical individualism of the sort ascribed to Ayn Rand, and Reed responded that it did not. I didn’t think, though, that he addressed the question in much depth.

Again, the split between methodological and philosophical individualism reminds me of the split between methodological and philosophical naturalism in discussions of evolution. The problem I have with “methodological individualism,” as I understand it, is that it actually dehumanizes people by reducing them to “rational” incentive maximizers, actually gutting them of what makes them persons. Or in other words, I don’t see how you can study people economically as individuals, because individuals do all kinds of weird things for weird reasons. But it is quite possible that I misunderstand what Austrian economics means by “methodological individualism.”

Furthermore, I’m quite aware that not everyone at Acton would sign on to Austrian economics, or would be as hostile to any kind of state intervention in the market as Reed and Tucker are. After all, at least this year, it was Morse and not Reed or Tucker who gave the foundational lecture on economics. One of the things that I appreciate about Acton is its diversity of perspective. But I’m still seeking further understanding of just how the different approaches relate to each other, and particularly how the connection of economic thought and Christian faith is handled. More on this last point in the next post!

Edwin Woodruff Tait is a freelance writer, farmer, and consulting editor for Christian History magazine. He blogs at Ithilien and tweets as @Amandil3. (Extra points if you get the Tolkien reference.)

Previous Post

June 25, 2015

10 Steps Toward Becoming a Culturally Engaged Church

Next Post

June 27, 2015 But what about sin? more from #ActonU

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Art Audio posts Bible and Work Book Review Books Budgeting Calling Common Good Community Development Conferences Discipleship Economics Entrepreneurship Ethics Faith and Family Faith and the Marketplace Faith and the Workplace faith and work History of Work and Vocation Leadership Local Church Meaning New Blogger News Prayer Relationships Seminaries Theology of Work Uncategorized Video posts Vocation Worship Resources

Select a Month April 2026 October 2025 September 2025 July 2025 April 2025 January 2025 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 May 2024 March 2024 February 2024 December 2023 November 2023 August 2023 July 2023 April 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 May 2022 April 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 June 2021 May 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 January 2020 December 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 April 2018 March 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What is the main theme of the Parable of the Two Sons?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Honesty is best Repentance is easy Obedience is proved by actions Firstborns are favored