Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Careers, Workplace and Religion
Is there really enough to go around for everybody? #ActonU

Is there really enough to go around for everybody? #ActonU

Last updated on: August 5, 2015 at 1:35 pm by Edwin Woodruff Tait

Is there really enough to go around for everybody? #ActonU 2015-08-05T13:35:33-05:00 Edwin Woodruff Tait

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

More of our “correspondent on the spot” at Acton University! Follow the Twitter feed from the conference here and read his first three posts here:

By Edwin Woodruff Tait

The third lecture of the day, Jennifer Roback Morse’s presentation of economic theory, moved into territory with which I’m less familiar than with the philosophical and political issues discussed by Gregg and Miller. One of the many reasons I jumped at the opportunity to attend Acton University was that I am very ignorant of economic matters and need to remedy that. Morse’s presentation was, like those of her colleagues, both substantive and entertaining. In fact, she probably had the most engaging style of any of the foundation presenters, though that’s a hard call because they were all very good. According to Morse, the basic principles of economics are that

There is a truth to be discovered
There is such a thing as human nature; and
People respond predictably to incentives.

She suggested that the first two principles are accepted by orthodox Christians and by economists, but not by most others in our society. Hence, at this level there is a basic affinity between Christianity and economic theory. I’m not sure about this myself, and I think that the third principle demonstrates the problems with her claim. Doesn’t the view that people respond predictably to incentives threaten the Christian doctrine of free will? (Well, unless you go with Jonathan Edwards’ doctrine of the will–and I’m going to go out on a limb and say that I don’t think Edwards is entirely orthodox on that point.)

Isn’t the “human nature” posited by economics something fundamentally mechanistic and soulless, a rational maximizing of benefits and minimizing of costs that leaves little room for what makes human behavior interesting and (sometimes) beautiful?

Morse then proceeded to a basic definition of capitalism, citing John Paul II’s distinction in Centesimus Annus between capitalism as a basically free economy founded on voluntary exchange, and capitalism as a free economy unconstrained by a “juridical” framework based on moral principles. In other words, from Morse’s perspective the capitalism worth defending is not unregulated capitalism but a capitalism set firmly within a moral framework, with plenty of room for governmental and other limits when those are clearly necessary to the common good.

Morse drove home this distinction by suggesting that whereas Acton had originally been founded in opposition to liberation theology, in recent years Ayn-Rand-style libertarianism has become an equal threat. She thus positioned Acton’s ideology as the “golden mean” between leftism and Randian libertarianism. I found her willingness to call out “the threat from the right” refreshing and cheering. The “Acton synthesis,” as she presents it, is “the basic market framework, constrained and limited by Christian virtue.” That’s a formula I can support, even if I might have some different ideas about what that “constraining and limiting” should look like.

Based on this core definition, she then raised three questions:

Does the scale of enterprise matter, in and of itself?
Do we care about inequality per se? Is defending the weak a better principle?
Suppose we agree that the government has some role to play in creating the juridical framework Pope St. John Paul describes. How can we marry our good intentions with sound policy?

I think these are all excellent questions. My tentative answers at this point would be

The bigger the scale of the enterprise, generally the more room there is for abuse. So it matters, but that’s not to say that large-scale enterprises (or large political entities) are inherently bad. Just that our willingness to be critical and ask tough questions about an institution should increase in proportion to its scale.
Yes, I think defending the weak is a better way to put it. But I don’t think this is an either/or. Inequality, in the senses in which I’ve seen people complain about it, is very much about an inequality of power in one way or another. Hence, to defend the weak is to be concerned about inequality.
This one I’m very much still working on, and have much to learn from the speakers at Acton University.

Morse then distinguished helpfully between two different ways of looking at economics. The definition most often presented in introductory courses is that economics is the study of scarcity–how to allocate scarce resources in the face of infinite demands. But, she suggested, an alternative way to look at it is as the study of exchange of all kinds. (This was one of several times so far that something a speaker has said has reminded me of Charles Williams’ wonderful poem “Bors to Elaine: On the King’s Coins”–”money is a medium of exchange.”)

The rest of Morse’s talk was a summary of the basic principles that govern the free market. I’ll just mention a few points I found illuminating. One was the importance of “non-monetary costs.” The obvious basic principle of free exchange is that the buyer will have an incentive to pay as little as possible and the seller to get as much as possible. But Morse pointed out that this calculation includes more than just money. It includes, for instance, “opportunity cost”–what the participants could be doing other than buying or selling. (This has been a serious consideration for me this summer in deciding whether or not to take my produce to a farmers’ market. I could probably make enough to cover the basic fees charged by the markets in my area and still make a modest profit. But attendance at a farmers’ market would wipe out my Saturday morning and early afternoon, and/or another day in the week as well depending on which market I was attending. And that is a more serious deterrent than the financial overhead involved.)

Click for more on possible problems with free-market economics!

Previous Post

June 18, 2015

“Don’t immanentize the eschaton," or whether we might need utopias after all #ActonU

Next Post

June 18, 2015 Co-Workers Are Not Projects: Evangelizing in the Workplace

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Art Audio posts Bible and Work Book Review Books Budgeting Calling Common Good Community Development Conferences Discipleship Economics Entrepreneurship Ethics Faith and Family Faith and the Marketplace Faith and the Workplace faith and work History of Work and Vocation Leadership Local Church Meaning New Blogger News Prayer Relationships Seminaries Theology of Work Uncategorized Video posts Vocation Worship Resources

Select a Month April 2026 October 2025 September 2025 July 2025 April 2025 January 2025 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 May 2024 March 2024 February 2024 December 2023 November 2023 August 2023 July 2023 April 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 May 2022 April 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 June 2021 May 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 January 2020 December 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 April 2018 March 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

How many people were saved from Sodom?

Select your answer to see how you score.

6 4 3 5