Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Careers, Workplace and Religion
The year of jubilee

The year of jubilee

Last updated on: March 26, 2015 at 12:39 pm by Oikonomia Network

The year of jubilee 2015-03-24T13:35:14-05:00 Oikonomia Network

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

By Keith Reeves

Note: This article is the first of a three-part series on economic production and Jubilee in the Old and New Testaments. Stay tuned for the other two!

Jubilee is often proclaimed as a time when debts are forgiven and land is redistributed so everyone can begin again with a fresh start. I have personally heard sermons to that effect, and one does not need to dig too deeply on the Internet to find this view expressed. But is that what the biblical Jubilee is about? Or have we been reading our modern notions of ownership and redistribution backward into an ancient economy where these categories simply don’t apply?

The Jubilee is commanded in Leviticus 25, and it is commanded in a way that might seem baffling to us. The critical directive comes in verse 13: “In this year of jubilee you shall return, every one of you, to your property.” People are not commanded to give their property away; in God’s eyes, no change of ownership over the land seems to occur. Rather, people are commanded to return to land that is already, in God’s eyes, “your own.”

We need to back up and examine what it meant to own property in ancient Israel. The story of the land begins with God’s promise to Abraham. In Genesis 12:1-3 we read: “Now the LORD said to Abram, ‘Go from your country and your kindred and your father’s house to the land that I will show you. I will make of you a great nation, and I will bless you, and make your name great, so that you will be a blessing. I will bless those who bless you, and the one who curses you I will curse; and in you all the families of the earth shall be blessed.’” God’s promise to Abraham drives the entire narrative of Genesis and the fulfillment of that promise is a major theme throughout the Pentateuch and the historical books.

God promises Abraham three things: property, progeny, and prosperity. This blessing is not for Abraham alone; he is blessed so he can be a blessing to the nations. In response to God’s promise, Abraham does something radical. Genesis 12:4 tells us that Abraham “went.” He leaves his people and begins his journey to the promised land. The journey is fraught with difficulties, and at times it appears the promise will not be fulfilled.

Eventually, the people do settle in the land, but very soon there is famine and they are forced to make a trek to Egypt. The time in Egypt ends up being hundreds of years. Though the people are prosperous for a time, soon the harsh realities of being aliens in a foreign land afflict them. They call out to God for deliverance. And through miraculous deeds of power, by the hand of Moses, the descendants of Abraham are delivered from Egypt – only to wander in the wilderness for a period of 40 years.

The books of Joshua and Judges detail their transition into the land. Sometimes it is dramatic, sometimes it is gradual, but eventually the people have established their presence in the land. In some way, they can call it their own.

This transition, or conquest, is described as “inheriting the land.” The word “inherit” (ירשׁ) is used repeatedly in Deuteronomy, where Moses instructs the people about what will happen, and in Joshua and Judges, where the events themselves are narrated. In this article I will translate ירשׁ as “inherit” but it is also translated as “occupy,” “dispossess,” and “drive out” in various Bible translations.

The idea of inheritance reinforces the concept that the land is God’s gift. It is his to give to the people. It also reinforces the familial nature of the relationship between Israel and their God. This is not some business transaction; this is family.

The land was fundamental to Israel’s economic life and to the Israelites’ very identity. According to Numbers 26:52-56, initial allotments were made by lot according to size of the tribe. Larger tribes received larger inheritances, and smaller tribes received smaller inheritances. The tribe of Levi was the only tribe that did not receive an allotment of land; they were to guard and serve in the temple rather than farm the land. Their inheritance was to be the tithes and offerings brought by the other tribes to support them.

Even though the land is originally allotted to the tribes, they do not actually own it. Within the tribe there are smaller groups or clans, and within the clans there is an even more local family unit called the “father’s house.” This unit is headed by the “father,” the oldest living patriarch of the family. Children, grandchildren, and great grandchildren are all under the authority of the father.

The father’s house is the essential economic and social unit of ancient Israel. It is in the father’s house where land is maintained and owned. The whole economic system is designed around this central feature, and that means the nature of land ownership is different from anything we are familiar with in the modern world.

The father cannot sell the land of the house. His heirs always have a claim to it. In Leviticus 25:23 we read: “The land shall not be sold in perpetuity, for the land is mine; with me you are but aliens and tenants.” The father can give some land away, but such a gift is valid only during his own lifetime; then the land returns to the house. Land was never to be permanently sold.

All the various laws governing land are designed to keep the land in the family – in the father’s house. If a family gets into financial trouble, the father can “sell” a piece of land. In reality, however, this purported “sale” functions more like a long-term lease. The value of the property must be computed based on the number of years until the next Jubilee, at which point the original family returns to its own (“your own,” verse 13) land. Ownership of the land was never really transferred.

To divide the land of a father’s house essentially destroys it. When a head of household dies, the land is divided among the heirs. When this happens, the divided father’s house ceases to operate as a father’s house; responsibilities that had rested with it now revert to the clan. This includes such things as holding sacrificial meals, taking vengeance, redeeming family members, and – of course – redeeming family land so it would stay in the clan.

The Jubilee year, then, is not designed to redistribute property. It is designed to keep land permanently in the hands of its original holders, the father’s houses. The economic system of ancient Israel is based on the primacy of these houses, and the Jubilee preserves that primacy.

This is not to say that the Old Testament makes no provision for the poor. Far from it! The well-being of the poor is a central concern throughout the scriptures. But large-scale, systematic redistribution of property is not envisioned as the solution.

Because land can never truly be sold in the economic system of ancient Israel, those who are not part of the original group of landed families cannot acquire it. Land was, of course, the basis of economic production in the agrarian economy of ancient Israel. So provision was made for the landless. Leviticus 19:9–10 states:

When you reap the harvest of your land, you shall not reap to the very edges of your field, or gather the gleanings of your harvest. You shall not strip your vineyard bare, or gather the fallen grapes of your vineyard; you shall leave them for the poor and the alien: I am the LORD your God.

The provision made for those in economic need is not a redistribution of property. It is the opportunity to work – to support themselves through their own efforts – that is provided. In the zero-sum world of a land-based economy, the land owners must refrain from making full economic use of their own land in order to ensure that everyone has the opportunity to work. But it is work, not property, that is “redistributed” by this requirement. And this work then provides the wealth creation that will in turn support, in the context of household and clan relationships, those who are unable to work.

In a modern, entrepreneurial economy, wealth is created in a wide variety of ways. Agriculture plays a very small role in wealth production. We can be thankful that today, there is no need to impose restrictions on one person’s economic use of his own property in order to provide opportunity to others.

To the contrary, we can best expand opportunity to the poor by protecting property owners’ rights to make full use of their property. Books like “The Mystery of Capital” and “The Locust Effect” have emphasized that the poor benefit disproportionately from such protections. In the second article in this series, we will look at how this critical difference between the ancient and modern economies can inform our reading of the New Testament.

Keith Reeves is professor of biblical studies at Azusa Pacific University. This post originally appeared at the Oikonomia Network. Image: ON.

Previous Post

March 25, 2015

I once was found but now am lost?

Next Post

March 28, 2015 Moving the pastor out of the center: #5 in a series

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Art Audio posts Bible and Work Book Review Books Budgeting Calling Common Good Community Development Conferences Discipleship Economics Entrepreneurship Ethics Faith and Family Faith and the Marketplace Faith and the Workplace faith and work History of Work and Vocation Leadership Local Church Meaning New Blogger News Prayer Relationships Seminaries Theology of Work Uncategorized Video posts Vocation Worship Resources

Select a Month April 2026 October 2025 September 2025 July 2025 April 2025 January 2025 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 May 2024 March 2024 February 2024 December 2023 November 2023 August 2023 July 2023 April 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 May 2022 April 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 June 2021 May 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 January 2020 December 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 April 2018 March 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What was Elihu’s main argument against Job during Job's test?

Select your answer to see how you score.

That Job had committed a secret sin That Job had abandoned the law That Job didn’t pray enough That Job was self-righteous