Justice in #Ferguson

Last updated on: December 8, 2014 at 10:36 am by Greg Forster

Justice in #Ferguson 2014-12-05T14:40:22-05:00 Greg Forster

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

(Originally published in September 2014 at the KPN Resources blog.)

I recently was asked a truly startling question while giving a talk on the church and economics. It was a question that shows how some efforts to speak out for justice can actually undermine justice. If we misidentify the source of injustice, we will not only fail to fight it, but may actually become its unwitting accomplices.

I had argued that in spite of the serious challenges it creates, the entrepreneurial economy is on balance a good thing for both our spiritual and material well-being. Compared with what came before, the economy produced by the Industrial Revolution does a better job of honoring the dignity of the ordinary worker and teaching people to love their neighbors across cultural boundaries. That’s because the Industrial Revolution itself was catalyzed by the church’s influence on culture and institutions.

Someone asked how I would respond to the charge that my view amounts to “colonialism” because “the people in Ferguson, Mo., and places like that aren’t able to participate in this economic system you’re describing.” Communities like Ferguson certainly do represent a deep challenge for those of us who are concerned about justice and economic flourishing. I’ll say something about that in a moment. But first, let’s stop and think about what this person was saying.

His comment is very revealing. The view he asked me to respond to was not centered on opposition to particular injustices that might be preventing the people of Ferguson from flourishing economically. Extending rights and dignity to the poor so they could participate in the economy the way others do was precisely what I had been advocating in my talk. Yet this person rejected what I was offering; he proposed that fighting for the rights of the poor to work and become self-supporting participants in the modern, entrepreneurial economy was “colonialism.”

How does this person think about the human beings who live in Ferguson? He isn’t thinking about the people of Ferguson as image-bearers who are capable of doing work that adds value to their community. If he did, he wouldn’t say that treating them as such image-bearers is “colonialism.” He – or at least the hypothetical person whose view he was asking me to respond to – is thinking of them as helpless dependents who cannot have agency in their own lives, cannot be stewards of the world alongside people like you and me.

This way of thinking about people who are materially impoverished is the starting point for almost all forms of economic injustice. It is the buried assumption in our culture that contributes to almost all of the problems our poor neighbors face. It is the reason that so many of the church’s efforts to help the poor are ineffective and even harmful. It is the primary obstacle to the emergence of more constructive approaches. And it is slowly moving us toward a permanent two-tiered society.

There do appear to be real injustices happening in Ferguson. The criminal justice statistics and other indicators do not paint a picture of a police and court system that is going after genuine criminals while safeguarding the peaceful public. There is at least some evidence suggesting that public institutions may not be governing in the interests of the community, but seeking to maximize the amount of money they can extort from people through abusive practices. The conduct of the Ferguson police since the shooting has not inspired confidence, either.

Joining with the poor to fight for their economic rights – their right to work, own, buy and sell, save up, and build something for themselves without having it stripped away by the powerful – is almost always one of the most important things we can do. But it is not the only thing. Churches can become engines of job creation, bringing together the entrepreneurs, workers, investors, and other constituencies needed to form new businesses.

Now the question is: which church is going to do these things? The church that thinks the people of Ferguson are not capable of participating in the entrepreneurial economy, are not capable of serving alongside us as stewards of the world, are not capable of achieving all that the opportunities of the modern world have to offer them? Or the church that thinks they are?

It is precisely because, and only because, the church believes that the people of Ferguson are capable of participating in the entrepreneurial economy that the church will care about their rights. Once we start thinking of the poor as dependents who cannot support themselves, we become unconscious but very real allies of their oppressors. This person’s question could almost have been invented in a laboratory to demonstrate the danger of thinking about justice as something that rich white people steward on behalf of poor black people, rather than something we all create together as responsible stewards in community.

Previous Post

December 8, 2014

WEEKLY ROUNDUP: More news to challenge and encourage about faith and work

Next Post

December 8, 2014 First Sunday of Advent: a poem

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Art Audio posts Bible and Work Book Review Books Budgeting Calling Common Good Community Development Conferences Discipleship Economics Entrepreneurship Ethics Faith and Family Faith and the Marketplace Faith and the Workplace faith and work History of Work and Vocation Leadership Local Church Meaning New Blogger News Prayer Relationships Seminaries Theology of Work Uncategorized Video posts Vocation Worship Resources

Select a Month April 2026 October 2025 September 2025 July 2025 April 2025 January 2025 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 May 2024 March 2024 February 2024 December 2023 November 2023 August 2023 July 2023 April 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 May 2022 April 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 June 2021 May 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 January 2020 December 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 April 2018 March 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who had a vision of a great sheet filled with unclean animals?

Select your answer to see how you score.

John Paul Peter Stephen