#GodWhoSends: The Struggle With Defining Missional

Last updated on: September 10, 2012 at 12:40 pm by Steve Knight

#GodWhoSends: The Struggle With Defining Missional 2012-09-10T09:45:23-03:00 Steve Knight

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

In his seminal book God Who Sends: A Fresh Quest for Biblical Mission, Dr. Francis M. DuBose describes the challenge he saw in defining “mission”:

“Why the need for a fresh quest? The simple answer, which is profound in its implication, is that we do not have an accepted definition of mission. …

“A major problem in defining mission stems from the fact that, except for a few instances in the Revised Standard Version, the word mission does not appear in our English Bible. Mission means sending. This is the dictionary meaning and the usually recognized definition by mission writers. However, most missiologists in their writings and the Christian community in its general speech do not use the term sending in common reference to the idea which we usually mean, imply, or assume by the use of the term mission or its plural form missions. …

“Theological studies which address themselves in some way to the meaning of mission suffer mostly from the lack of a hermeneutic. They have not established clear principles of interpretation in arriving at their concepts. … The Scriptures are used, sometimes extensively. However, the approach has been essentially proof texting without a clear, consistent hermeneutic. …

“Closely related to the theological problem in defining mission is the administrational problem. Indeed, a part of the theological problem is the lack of a clear biblical theology of mission administration. … When we confuse theological and administrational concepts or when we use biblical terms to convey nonbiblical concepts of administration, we cannot hope for a clear biblical understanding of mission.

“The problem of definition is not simply a theoretical one, the concern only of scholars of mission and mission administrators. It is one which pervades the life of the churches even where there is usually a strong positive feeling about the missionary enterprise. In such circles there is often a strong mystique of mission but not usually a clear understanding of idea of mission. (sic)”

What do you think? Is it encouraging or discouraging to realize that this problem of definition goes quite far back? I guess for me it is actually somewhat encouraging, because the fact that we’re still struggling with it comes then as no real surprise. Reading back over Dr. DuBose’s thinking may be helpful in unraveling the twists and turns in defining missional for our time. I’ll keep you posted …

Post your thoughts/reflections in the comments and/or tweet them using the hashtag #GodWhoSends

Previous Post

September 10, 2012

Missional Monday: Wild Goose West Recap, New Brian McLaren Book Bows, Parish Collective Rocks

Next Post

September 11, 2012 9/11 and the Emerging Missional Church

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Books Definitions Events Funding Funny History Mainline denominations Missional Mondays Networks Offers Startups Tech Theology Video Youth-Young Adult Ministry

Select a Month January 2014 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 June 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What did the Israelites worship while Moses was on Mount Sinai?

Select your answer to see how you score.

A golden calf A statue of Moses The ark A bronze snake