Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Coming down to Earth

Home
Catholic
Papal Humility

Papal Humility

Last updated on: July 15, 2015 at 1:00 am by Michael Novak

Papal Humility 2015-07-14T20:40:01-05:00 Michael Novak

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

On his way from Paraguay back to Rome recently, Pope Francis showed signs of personal humility, directly in front of the world’s press, that must be unrivaled in papal history.

By Benhur Arcayan/Malatinszky (cropping) [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons

Three times in the short interview of sixty-five minutes, Francis confessed that in his public teaching, especially on economics, he had not spoken well, or not fully, or else had done so with a considerable lack of knowledge, or with an inward resistance to dealing with economics.

He thanked reporters for pressing him on neglecting the middle class in his remarks. So much on the poor, one reporter said, so much on the rich. Why so little on the middle class?

The pope admitted he had been wrong on this, and that he would study the question and think about it more, and would try to improve in the future. He thanked the reporter for pointing out this fault in his public teaching so far.

During my years in Rome, I have observed four popes rather closely. All gave evidence of knowing their limitations and recognizing their ignorance about many things in this world. But I know of none who has been so frank about his personal limitations, his finite knowledge. I can’t remember anybody almost pleadingly ask for more help, more questions, more dialogue.

Pope John Paul II introduced eight or nine new ideas into Catholic social thought, from areas in which he had confronted his own lack of direct experience and then thought more fully about the things he didn’t know.

For example, in one encyclical, he claimed that “labor” is always superior to “capital,” because labor is always about humans, but capital is always about things – things like money, investments, machinery, equipment, factories. But by the time of a later encyclical, he began to stress the right to personal initiative and creativity, and to emphasize the acquisition of knowledge and know-how and new discoveries. In other words, he began to grasp the role of “human capital.”

This insight allowed John Paul II to generate a much more down-to-earth view of how wealth is created, and indeed, of the most important form of wealth: that which is rooted in human knowledge and habits.

Another example is when he began to speak of the economic need that is prior to the distribution of wealth, namely, the creation of new wealth. When more wealth is created, there is more to pass around to all: ‘‘A rising tide can lift all boats.”

Further still, John Paul II recognized the importance of “moral ecology,” that is, the widespread practice of good habits, the social power in ennobling stories and music that enriches the mind and soul, and the common desire of many to become better than they now are.

When families and individuals live within an upward-thrusting social milieu, it is much easier for them to grow in virtue and grace.

In a decadent culture, one that constantly lowers its moral standards and moral expectations, it is much harder for the young to swim against the tide and to defend themselves against the filth.

The moral ethos of cultures does rise and fall. There is a public ecology to the personal moral life.

“John Paul II 1980 cropped” by Fels_Papst.JPG: Nikolaus von Nathusiusderivative work: JJ Georges – This file was derived from: Fels Papst.JPG: . Licensed under Public Domain via Wikimedia Commons.

When John Paul II became pope, his chief adult experience had been lived under National Socialism and then under the economic socialism of the Soviets. He had very little prior experience of a free polity in a free economy.

Particularly in worldly matters such as politics, and especially in economics, every pope has had to be stretched beyond his personal experience to learn about the experience of others. Each has also had to learn new patterns of vision for interpreting economic realities more truly and realistically.

It is wonderful to see that our current pope, “Good Pope Francis,” is so willing to embark on the learning curve, and in frank and humble dialogue with so many different cultures.

Previous Post

July 8, 2015

Blue Environmentalism - Part Three

Next Post

July 22, 2015 Pope Francis Asked for Help on Economics

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Abortion America Art Ave Maria Beauty Bible Caritas Christian unity Dark night of the soul Democratic capitalism Economics Ecumenism Environment Eucharist Family Football Francis Golden Rule Human rights Inequality Iraq War John Paul II Just war Leo XIII Liberty Liturgy Love March for Life Marriage Moral ecology New Testament Old Testament Politics Poverty Prayer Shakespeare Spirituality Sports St. John of the Cross Subjectivity Tradition Travels Trinity Uncategorized

Select a Month August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does "I AM WHO I AM" mean in Hebrew?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Adonai Yahweh Elohim Jehovah-Jireh