Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Messy Inspirations

Home
Catholic
“Mark” and Mary for Mother’s Day

“Mark” and Mary for Mother’s Day

Last updated on: May 10, 2020 at 5:29 pm by Fellow Dying Inmate

“Mark” and Mary for Mother’s Day 2020-05-10T17:29:54-04:00 Fellow Dying Inmate

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Mark and Mary

Image by Dorothée QUENNESSON from Pixabay

“Mark,” the earliest Gospel, does not present a flattering picture of Jesus’ biological family and mother.

“Mark” doesn’t give us a nice, Mother’s Day image of Mary, the mother of Jesus (please see yesterday’s post about Mary). Indeed, the Markan portrayal of Jesus’ entire natural family can be quite shocking to Catholic Christians! Dated at around 70 CE, this is the earliest document we have that features Mary (Mark 6:3).

Forty years pass since the death and resurrection and not a word about Mary was written! And the first chance someone gets to write about her isn’t pretty. Watch below…

Jesus in “Mark”

The author called “Mark” reports Jesus’ death, presenting him as a perfect Mediterranean male. Jesus in “Mark” behaves as a real Mediterranean hero, dying honorably (Mark 15:25-39). Jesus in “Mark” always is presented with manly honor, marked for death right from the beginning of his ministry.

Early in the Gospel of “Mark,” powerful forces becomes enemies of Jesus (Pharisees and Herodians). They want Jesus dead (Mark 3:6). Therefore, what does Jesus’ mother and biological family resolve to do? They agree with the scribes (Mark 3:22) and declare him crazy (Mark 3:21), equivalent to being possessed. Why?

Shaming Enemies Earns You a Death Sentence

From the very beginning of Mark’s storyline and throughout the entire Gospel, the Markan Jesus pisses off powerful people. Repeatedly this Galilean peasant and master of the insult publicly humiliates influential and deadly enemies. To be shamed in public is worse than death in the Mediterranean world where honor is valued above all else.

What happens in the biblical world to someone who shames another and fails to make appropriate amends? It is assured that either that offended person himself (yes, that’s deliberate gender usage) or his avenger was honor-driven to kill the offender. Therefore, in this cultural world of honor and shame, the offender (Jesus) is as good as dead! Consequently, his fate is sealed.

Unless, and only unless, Jesus’ family declares him being out of his mind. Scholar John Pilch says that’s the only escape in this world from the death sentence Jesus actively sought out for himself. But such a declaration comes at a hefty price! Because now Jesus’ family have to keep him housebound—he can never again leave, find work, act publicly, marry or anything a normal Israelite male would do. But, hey!—at least he’d be alive, right? Although many would prefer death to such a “life.”

This is what the mother of Jesus and his kin are trying to do with him in “Mark.” Because they wish to save him and stop him. After all, he is embarrassing them. And humiliating them. And endangering their social position through his antics and scandal. So positively, they attempt to save him; negatively, they become an obstacle to him. Their efforts are thwarted regardless (Mark 14:1-2).

Negative Portrayal

Folks, this doesn’t place Jesus’ mother and biological kin in a good light. No matter how you spin their desire to see Jesus safe, reading the whole of the Gospel called “Mark” we realize that Jesus’ mission was backed by God, empowered by God, and God-willed. Any attempt to stop Jesus’ ministry, even to save him, is against the will of God and the work of Satan (Mark 8:31-33). Given that, can you honestly say that the Markan portrayal of the Mother of Jesus is positive?

Certainly Mark 3:20-35 presents a most unflattering picture of Jesus’ village family. If this Gospel were the only one, we would never have known a richly evolved Mariology or any of our favorite Marian devotions. Mary is presented so negatively in “Mark.” Look at how the author fortifies the negative portrayal by Jesus’ complaint in Mark 6:4—

Jesus said to them, “A prophet is not without honor except in his native place and among his own kin and in his own house.”

That bit about “in his own house” is damning, folks.

Mariology Impossible with Only “Mark”

According to “Mark,” both she and Jesus’ biological kin from Nazareth are depicted as outsiders, rejected in favor of Jesus’ new fictive kin, the Jesus Movement (Mark 3:31-35). They obstruct Jesus, the son of God (Mark 1:1, 11, 24; 9:7). Mariology is impossible with this document alone.

We have a vast treasury of Marian beliefs and practices. It didn’t come from “Mark” alone. Tomorrow, we will explore how this evolved as we go forward in the evolution of the New Testament and Gospels…

Previous Post

May 10, 2020

Seeing the Invisible God

Next Post

May 11, 2020 Techniques to See God

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who saw the vision of the valley of dry bones?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Ezekiel Isaiah Jeremiah Daniel

Support this
Column