A conversation with my son about the difference between history and historiography

Last updated on: August 24, 2017 at 8:00 am by Morgan Guyton

A conversation with my son about the difference between history and historiography 2017-08-23T22:44:03-05:00 Morgan Guyton

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

My older son and I have been having some conversations during the past year about the confederate monuments. When New Orleans was taking down the monuments here this spring, he had some concerns about history being erased. So I explained to him that when we drive past the monuments, we just see ancient historical figures, but when black people drive past them, the message is that racist white people are still in charge of our country. Last week, after Charlottesville happened, we had some more conversation in which we discussed the difference between history and historiography.

History is the complicated mess of whatever actually happened in the past. Which is impossible to represent with perfect justice. Because every time you tell a story, you have to decide which details to include and which to leave out. You have to decide whose perspective is going to be centered and whose perspective is going to be peripheral. Deciding how to tell the story of history is historiography. The most important decision of historiography is who will be the protagonists. The default is usually to tell history from the perspective of the rulers and especially the military leaders as though their decisions, victories, and defeats defined everything for the people who lived around them.

That’s the historiographic decision being made when cities build statues of soldiers on horseback instead of building statues for the doctors, the nurses, the community organizers, the teachers, or the social workers who also could be lifted up as the leaders who cause the most impact in a society. But there’s an even more specific historiography being promoted by statues of Confederate war heroes. In no other country in the world does the losing side of a civil war have so many statues dedicated to its military leaders. There are immensely more Confederate Civil War monuments than there are Union Civil War monuments. Most of them were erected in the early 1900’s during the height of segregation and a season of white terrorism through lynch mobs and the KKK.

The monuments are part of a historiography that’s sometimes termed “The Lost Cause of the Confederacy.” In this telling of the story, the Civil War was fought to defend the “Southern way of life” rather than slavery itself. The “Southern way of life” is an imagined past defined by things like chivalry, honor, family, and sexual purity. When overt racial segregation was no longer socially tenable, the Southern way of life got sublimated into “family values.” Any uncertainty about whether “family values” has a sublimated racial core is put to rest by looking at how “family values” activists elected a proud philanderer who successfully dog-whistled their Southern way of life all the way into the White House.

So as I explained to my son, removing those monuments is not erasing history; it’s erasing white supremacist historiography. It’s time for some honest public reflection on our country’s white supremacist legacy that was simply swept under the rug and sublimated into sexual puritanism after the Civil Rights movement. It is entirely appropriate for the monuments that represent our past to reflect an intentional honesty about our nation’s history. If we want to do justice to our history, there are a whole lot of heroes from our past who aren’t white men and have never received any kind of public honor from the people in power.

As Christians, the model we have for historiography is the Old Testament. Whatever else is true about Israel, there has never been a tribe of people more brutally honest about the moral failings of their leaders. Most of Israel’s kings are cast aside as evil by its historians. Israel’s favorite king is exposed as a murderous adulterer with complete unflinching openness. When Bible-following white Christians are so defensive and deceitful about their ancestor’s sins, it shows that the Bible’s authority is completely selective for them.

Check out my book How Jesus Saves the World From Us!

Please help our campus ministry thrive! Every time somebody pledges to support us, my wife and I are able to focus a little bit more of our time on loving our students.

Previous Post

August 18, 2017

Why I Don't Believe in Punching Nazis

Next Post

August 26, 2017 The Theology That Pardons White Supremacy

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Advent Beauty Will Save the World Bible Big Picture: Ephesians Bloggers Book Christian salvation and the Beautitudes Culture Daily Office Danceable Homiletics Deadly Sins Deep Roots: Genesis Devotions Dominican Republic May 2011 El Principio Misericordia (The Mercy Principle) Five verses God tattooed on my heart Fundraising FutureGospel Good Biblical Words Henri Nouwen Interview Jennings' Christian Imagination Jesus inside the beltway Jesus Is My Candidate Jesus vs the Pharisees Jesus vs. Plato Journey to Eternity Looking Back on 2012 Love Actually Monday Merton Monday Merton Music Occupy the manger On Earth As It Is In Heaven Original Sin Podcast Poetry Politics Prayer Psalm 119 Radical Jesus 101 Reviews Sermon on the Mount Sermons Spanish Bible study Special Series Spiritual but not religious Synchroblog Theology Things that made me think Thomas a Kempis Ugliness Into Beauty Uncategorized Viaje Dominicano 2013 Walking in the Valley (Lent) Welcome: It's More than a Mat Wild Goose 2013 Wrestling

Select a Month March 2022 January 2022 December 2021 September 2021 April 2021 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What was the occupation of Lydia, Paul's first convert in Philippi?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Tentmaker Fisherman Tax collector Dealer in purple cloth