Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Mercy Not Sacrifice

Home
About
My Book
Archives
More
- Theology
- Culture
- Politics
- Sermons
- Bible
- Devotions
- Daily Office
- Podcast

Home
Progressive Christian
Why I Don’t Believe in Punching Nazis

Why I Don’t Believe in Punching Nazis

Last updated on: August 23, 2017 at 8:23 am by Morgan Guyton

Why I Don’t Believe in Punching Nazis 2017-08-23T08:23:34-05:00 Morgan Guyton

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

First of all, I have not yet participated in a protest where Antifa was present. I know that there’s an impossibly entangled mess of spin and truth about what Antifa has actually done. So the purpose of this post is not to critique actions I haven’t witnessed so much as offer my own reflections about when and how physical confrontation seems acceptable to me in street protest. Whatever has or hasn’t actually happened, I am unequivocally against engaging in acts of violence for the sole purpose of intimidation, even against Nazis.

I am strategically and religiously nonviolent, but I am not an ideological pacifist, meaning that I will never take up arms or engage in physical violence myself but I do not categorically condemn armed insurrection in all circumstances. In totalitarian contexts, armed insurrection seems justified to me. While I have much to criticize about Fidel Castro and Daniel Ortega, I do not see their armed insurrections to overthrow Fulgencio Bautista and Anastasio Somoza as innately immoral. Though Castro and Ortega ended up becoming dictators to different degrees, I’m not convinced that armed insurrection always inevitably has that result. Frantz Fanon writes quite persuasively in Wretched of the Earth that colonialism almost always requires armed insurrection to overthrow it.

The problem is that the line between acceptable and unacceptable militarism is never as clean as privileged people like me would like it to be. The default line Western culture likes to draw is to say that killing civilians is terrorism while killing military opponents in combat is valid, which works when you’re talking about two conventional militaries fighting each other, a scenario that rarely if ever happens anymore.

So if a fascist mob of civilians is armed with shields and bats, do they constitute a military target? What if they all have AR-15’s? When do they stop being civilians? Is preemptive strike legitimate or only self-defense? At what point are we actually in a civil war situation where protesters aren’t actually planning protest rallies but paramilitary engagements? We need to wrestle with these questions because the line between protest and insurrection is starting to get erased. Do we want to be supporting actions that escalate violence to the level of full-on civil war? That has stopped being a tinfoil hat kind of question to ask.

Given the disturbing evolution of our political landscape, I feel responsible for loudly advocating nonviolence in the street except in the case of self-defense. If someone with a baseball bat is charging at you or a vulnerable person you can protect, then I think it’s okay to intervene as forcefully as necessary. If a mob of racists is trying to gang-beat a black person to death (which they tried to do in Charlottesville), it seems reasonable to block their path and engage them in hand to hand combat. However, I am completely opposed to the idea of intimidating fascists through preemptive physical violence for both moral and strategic reasons. And I’m extremely concerned that intimidation is being normalized as a legitimate reason for violence.

Martyrdom is very attractive to disenchanted young men. That lesson ought to be awfully clear from the past three decades of Islamic terrorism in the Middle East. It may seem morally righteous to be cavalier about punching Nazis, but anyone with any degree of knowledge about human psychology could tell you that it’s stupid and dangerous to try to physically overpower a movement whose identity is parasitically dependent upon perceived persecution.

What scares the hell out of me is the thought of a rapidly spreading, hyper-masculine game of public Fight Club in which white men deal with their demons by beating the shit out of each other and eventually by spraying bullets into opposing crowds. No, I’m not saying that there’s an alt-left and alt-right that are mirror images of one another, but I don’t want to see toxic masculinity metastasize unchecked within antifascist protest culture (if that’s what’s happening) because of misplaced defensiveness that is being transplanted from other debates. I fear that physical violence may attract fascists rather than repel them by providing a means for existentially ruined men to go out in a blaze of glory.

It is critically important that we remain capable of non-binary conversations. Right now, too much discourse is being reduced to pro- and anti-. We figure out the one right line to retweet on our side and every other possible nuance is total betrayal. To say Black Lives Matter is a terrorist organization because some random black person set a gas station on fire is completely different from saying that white antifascist protesters shouldn’t punch Nazis unprovoked because it’s wrong and increases the danger for everyone. The first statement is wicked, cynical propaganda; the second is part of necessary movement dialogue that should not be drowned out with dismissive viral tweets.

Because of the postmodern tendency to use every debate to categorically invalidate the other side, the reflex of progressives is to treat any critique of anti-fascist tactics as just another form of “whataboutism” or #ManySides. But movements that have lost the space to self-critique and disagree internally have become totalitarian whether they’re fighting for beautiful ideals or not. I’m not saying that’s where we are; I’m saying that we have to speak up to avoid becoming that away.

So please let’s not allow violence for the sake of intimidation to become normalized as politically legitimate, regardless of who the recipient is. If violence becomes normalized, then it will be normalized for all parties, and we will be swept into a horror whose end I can’t even imagine. After surviving torture and brutality in Siberian prison camps, the Russian writer Alexander Solzhenitsyn said that “the battle-line between good and evil runs through the heart of every man.” It’s not my fault that the fascists are gaining strength in our country, but it’s my responsibility to resist them strategically and prayerfully, fully aware of my own capacity for evil.

If there are folks in the antifascist movement who feel like I’ve misunderstood what’s going on or have a different perspective to share, I’d love to hear it.

Check out my book How Jesus Saves the World From Us!

Our campus ministry NOLA Wesley has now reached $948 in monthly pledges. Help us make it to $1000 before Monday!

Previous Post

August 17, 2017

The week I stopped hating white evangelical men

Next Post

August 24, 2017 A conversation with my son about the difference between history and historiography

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Advent Beauty Will Save the World Bible Big Picture: Ephesians Bloggers Book Christian salvation and the Beautitudes Culture Daily Office Danceable Homiletics Deadly Sins Deep Roots: Genesis Devotions Dominican Republic May 2011 El Principio Misericordia (The Mercy Principle) Five verses God tattooed on my heart Fundraising FutureGospel Good Biblical Words Henri Nouwen Interview Jennings' Christian Imagination Jesus inside the beltway Jesus Is My Candidate Jesus vs the Pharisees Jesus vs. Plato Journey to Eternity Looking Back on 2012 Love Actually Monday Merton Monday Merton Music Occupy the manger On Earth As It Is In Heaven Original Sin Podcast Poetry Politics Prayer Psalm 119 Radical Jesus 101 Reviews Sermon on the Mount Sermons Spanish Bible study Special Series Spiritual but not religious Synchroblog Theology Things that made me think Thomas a Kempis Ugliness Into Beauty Uncategorized Viaje Dominicano 2013 Walking in the Valley (Lent) Welcome: It's More than a Mat Wild Goose 2013 Wrestling

Select a Month March 2022 January 2022 December 2021 September 2021 April 2021 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What did Jesus feed to the 5,000 people?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Bread and fish Cake and wine Fruit and cheese Chicken and rice