Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Mercy Not Sacrifice

Home
About
My Book
Archives
More
- Theology
- Culture
- Politics
- Sermons
- Bible
- Devotions
- Daily Office
- Podcast

Home
Progressive Christian
The Selective Inerrancy of Romans 13 for American Patriots

The Selective Inerrancy of Romans 13 for American Patriots

Last updated on: August 11, 2017 at 11:06 am by Morgan Guyton

The Selective Inerrancy of Romans 13 for American Patriots 2017-08-11T11:06:30-05:00 Morgan Guyton

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

“Bible with Cross Shadow,” David Campbell, Flickr C.C.

The signers of the Declaration of Independence were not biblical inerrantists. If they had been, they would have had to contend with Romans 13:1 which says “all authorities that exist have been instituted by God.” And they would have been forced to frame the grievances of their Declaration to justify their disobedience of Romans 13.

For John Calvin and his inerrantist minions, there was only one reason that rebelling against an established government was permissible: if obeying God required disobeying the established government. This was of course the polemical ground upon which Calvin built his argument for rebelling against the Roman Catholic Church. But this argument is nowhere to be found in the many grievances the English colonists list against King George III as justification for their rebellion. Their argument was a deist, rationalist argument. God was only relevant to them as a figurehead who endowed the rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

Does this mean that the American Revolution was biblically unjustifiable? John Wesley certainly believed so. He wrote a pamphlet denouncing it, entitled “A Calm Address to Our American Colonies,” where he says:

Ten times over, in different words, you “profess yourselves to be contending for liberty.” But it is a vain, empty profession: unless you mean by that threadbare word, a liberty from obeying your rightful sovereign, and from keeping the fundamental laws of your country. And this undoubtedly it is, which the confederated colonies are now contending for.

Not just the rebellion of the American colonies, but even the development of European democracy as such was a rebellion against Romans 13. Ask any of the Catholic kings of Europe or their many theologians who polemicized in favor of divinely appointed monarchy. I’ve read some of their biblically supported arguments against democracy. But that doesn’t stop white Christian oligarchs today who love their biblical inerrancy and their 18th century founding fathers about equally from using Romans 13 to denounce any protest against injustice by authority figures.

What’s so ironic is that Paul wrote Romans 13 primarily to tell the early Christians to pay their taxes (Romans 13:6-7). That’s his main point. But now the Christians who love to talk about authority and obedience (as long as they’re the authorities to be obeyed) have decided that they hate paying their taxes to the government since the civil rights movement compelled the government to serve people who aren’t white. Conservatism is not opposed to centralized power by nature. For most of history in most societies, it has been monarchical. Only in the racial environment of the United States could “conservatism” have taken the opportunistically libertarian shape it has during the past four decades of backlash against the civil rights movement.

That’s why the Tea Party is perfectly compatible with Romans 13, while Black Lives Matter is not. Because it’s unimaginable for the authority of our nation’s first black president to be “instituted by God,” but any white man with a badge and a gun is an “authority who must not be resisted” (Romans 13:2). A black president who quotes scripture cogently is a secret Muslim. A white president who proudly declares his lack of need for God’s mercy is the Cyrus who has come to save the poor persecuted white Christians.

So what do I think of Romans 13? It is probably the passage that I would come closest to throwing out of the canon, to be honest. I hope the apostle Paul knelt before Philando Castile when he arrived in heaven to beg his forgiveness for having written, “Do you wish to have no fear of the authority? Then do what is good, and you will receive its approval; for it is God’s servant for your good” (Romans 13:3-4). Maybe it works that way for white people just like it worked that way for Roman citizens like Paul back in the day. But it didn’t work that way for Castile, who did exactly what he was instructed to do and got murdered by a cop anyway.

What I absolutely agree with is the place where Paul ends up in Romans 13:7: “Pay to all what is due them—taxes to whom taxes are due, revenue to whom revenue is due, respect to whom respect is due, honor to whom honor is due.” Christians need to be people of honor and integrity in our interactions with all the people and institutions of the world, however corrupt they may be. We cannot segregate ourselves into gated communities of privilege who wash our hands of the common good.

But the other thing I need to add is that what Christian authority looks like is Jesus dying helplessly on the cross. It is on the cross that Jesus has the authority God chooses. In the book of Revelation, it is a slaughtered lamb before whom the multitudes prostrate themselves. By representing himself to us in this way, God confers his authority upon those whom we marginalize and crucify. Romans 13 was written by and for the persecuted. It was not written to people who are in power as a means of validating their power. So the best way for Christians who have power and privilege today to honor Romans 13 is to prostrate ourselves before those who are being crucified and marginalized in our world.

Check out my book How Jesus Saves the World From Us!

Please help our campus ministry empower marginalized college students by becoming a monthly patron!

Previous Post

July 3, 2017

When God Won't Let Me Go Off On The Evangelicals

Next Post

July 9, 2017 Five twitter theology feeds: the gospel, hyervigilant moralism, law and order, God's glory, Good Samaritan

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Advent Beauty Will Save the World Bible Big Picture: Ephesians Bloggers Book Christian salvation and the Beautitudes Culture Daily Office Danceable Homiletics Deadly Sins Deep Roots: Genesis Devotions Dominican Republic May 2011 El Principio Misericordia (The Mercy Principle) Five verses God tattooed on my heart Fundraising FutureGospel Good Biblical Words Henri Nouwen Interview Jennings' Christian Imagination Jesus inside the beltway Jesus Is My Candidate Jesus vs the Pharisees Jesus vs. Plato Journey to Eternity Looking Back on 2012 Love Actually Monday Merton Monday Merton Music Occupy the manger On Earth As It Is In Heaven Original Sin Podcast Poetry Politics Prayer Psalm 119 Radical Jesus 101 Reviews Sermon on the Mount Sermons Spanish Bible study Special Series Spiritual but not religious Synchroblog Theology Things that made me think Thomas a Kempis Ugliness Into Beauty Uncategorized Viaje Dominicano 2013 Walking in the Valley (Lent) Welcome: It's More than a Mat Wild Goose 2013 Wrestling

Select a Month March 2022 January 2022 December 2021 September 2021 April 2021 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

How many disciples did Jesus have?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Seven Twelve Twenty Ten