Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Mercy Not Sacrifice

Home
About
My Book
Archives
More
- Theology
- Culture
- Politics
- Sermons
- Bible
- Devotions
- Daily Office
- Podcast

Home
Progressive Christian
Resolutions Don’t Erase White Supremacy

Resolutions Don’t Erase White Supremacy

Last updated on: June 19, 2017 at 10:36 am by Morgan Guyton

Resolutions Don’t Erase White Supremacy 2017-06-19T10:36:23-05:00 Morgan Guyton

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

SBC President Steve Gaines and his wife Donna

It’s a measure of how morally depraved the church has become that a Southern Baptist Convention resolution condemning overt racism and fascism is considered a major victory. The “alt-right” presents conservative evangelicalism with an easy target, but white supremacy is a lot bigger than the alt-right and pretending that it has been addressed by condemning the alt-right will only serve to perpetuate it. White supremacy is thoroughly embedded in every aspect of a theology that has been distorted for the past five centuries by the need to justify colonialism, genocide, and slavery in Jesus’ name.

The mistake that Al Mohler and his Southern Baptist buddies make is assuming that white supremacy is fully encompassed in a sense of “racial superiority,” as though the modern racial distinctions of white and black are analogous to ethnic distinctions like Athenians and Spartans or French and English. But that’s not the way race functions. White identity is built upon the myth of a universal humanity which transcends cultural particularity.

White people are not people who belong to a particular culture, but people who have successfully assimilated into the imaginary universal humanity. What makes people of color “inferior” under white supremacy is not a comparison between their culture and another culture, but rather their inability to assimilate into the universal “colorblind” humanity of whiteness. So the logic of universal humanity that Al Mohler uses to condemn “racial superiority” is actually the logic that underwrites white supremacy.

It is the idea that “born again” Christians no longer have distinct cultural identities that creates a racial hierarchy; the racial superiority of whiteness is its lack of cultural particularity. The original hierarchy was between the “new humanity” (European Christians) whose baptism into Christ put them above culture and ethnicity and the “old humanity” (heathens in Africa, the Americas, and Asia) who needed to be rescued from their cultures in order to be saved. The brutality of European colonialism was justified as the Christianization of heathen cultures throughout the world. And indeed the most honest conservative evangelicals today are those like Doug Wilson who recognize that their theology compels them to call slavery an eternally beneficial necessary evil for evangelizing African people.

One of the most important early colonial theologians Juan Gines de Sepulveda used the Great Commission as the basis for justifying the Christian Spanish king’s divinely appointed authority to enslave the natives of the Americas. The infamous Catholic doctrine of discovery established by the papal bull Romanus Pontifex is likewise based on a sense that God has appointed European conquistadors to create a “single divine fold” of humanity by conquering the “infidels”:

The Roman pontiff, successor of the key-bearer of the heavenly kingdom and vicar of Jesus Christ, contemplating with a father’s mind all the several climes of the world and the characteristics of all the nations dwelling in them and seeking and desiring the salvation of all, wholesomely ordains and disposes upon careful deliberation those things which he sees will be agreeable to the Divine Majesty and by which he may bring the sheep entrusted to him by God into the single divine fold, and may acquire for them the reward of eternal felicity, and obtain pardon for their souls. This we believe will more certainly come to pass, through the aid of the Lord, if we bestow suitable favors and special graces on those Catholic kings and princes, who, like athletes and intrepid champions of the Christian faith, as we know by the evidence of facts, not only restrain the savage excesses of the Saracens and of other infidels, enemies of the Christian name, but also for the defense and increase of the faith vanquish them and their kingdoms and habitations.

If the “single divine fold” of humanity consists in generic, equally sinful individuals whose cultural context and social location are irrelevant, then it makes sense for white supremacist theology to cultivate a generic, ahistorical account of Christian salvation. Instead of the collective healing and restoration proclaimed by Mary’s Magnificat, Jesus’ first sermon in Nazareth, and throughout Paul’s epistles, the generic individualist salvation of white supremacy consists in Jesus convincing God not to torture some people forever provided they are officially “justified” by “accepting him as Lord and savior.”

The critical move that white supremacist theology makes in order to erase its own sin is to turn sin into a set of abstract individualized demerits against God which must be “paid back” by Jesus’ blood rather than a demonic, oppressive ordering of humanity which Jesus’ movement of cross-bearing martyrs is established to destroy. There are no plaintiffs in the heavenly courtroom of white supremacist Christianity, only generic, equally sinful defendants. There is no restoration, only retribution. It is a theology forged by the need to erase history. Rather than bringing us into solidarity with the crucified, Jesus’ cross functions as a giant eraser.

In such a theology, Jesus’ cross is an abstract, ahistorical formula that applies mathematically to the generic sin of ahistorical everymen rather than being the disempowerment of Roman imperial terror by the nonviolent love of a Jewish messiah. Only a theology that had already erased the terror of the cross and made it into an abstraction could produce a movement that used a burning cross as the symbol of its racist terror. The cross had to be emptied of its bloody brown messiah before it could be appropriated as the self-justifying stamp of white terrorism. You don’t have to burn a cross to be a white supremacist; you just have to wipe the blood off and use it as an eraser.

It’s all good and well to condemn alt-right terrorist ideology and indeed we all should, but that’s like plucking leaves off of a hideous weed whose roots extend miles beneath the surface of our garden. Until white evangelical theology is decolonized, it will continue to produce white supremacy however vehemently it condemns it.

Check out my book How Jesus Saves the World From Us: 12 Antidotes To Toxic Christianity!

Please help us reach our goal of 100 monthly patrons for our inclusive, justice-seeking campus ministry NOLA Wesley!

Previous Post

June 12, 2017

When Bishop Harvey flipped the script on bold imagination

Next Post

June 16, 2017 No, Alcoholism and Homosexuality are Not Analogous

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Advent Beauty Will Save the World Bible Big Picture: Ephesians Bloggers Book Christian salvation and the Beautitudes Culture Daily Office Danceable Homiletics Deadly Sins Deep Roots: Genesis Devotions Dominican Republic May 2011 El Principio Misericordia (The Mercy Principle) Five verses God tattooed on my heart Fundraising FutureGospel Good Biblical Words Henri Nouwen Interview Jennings' Christian Imagination Jesus inside the beltway Jesus Is My Candidate Jesus vs the Pharisees Jesus vs. Plato Journey to Eternity Looking Back on 2012 Love Actually Monday Merton Monday Merton Music Occupy the manger On Earth As It Is In Heaven Original Sin Podcast Poetry Politics Prayer Psalm 119 Radical Jesus 101 Reviews Sermon on the Mount Sermons Spanish Bible study Special Series Spiritual but not religious Synchroblog Theology Things that made me think Thomas a Kempis Ugliness Into Beauty Uncategorized Viaje Dominicano 2013 Walking in the Valley (Lent) Welcome: It's More than a Mat Wild Goose 2013 Wrestling

Select a Month March 2022 January 2022 December 2021 September 2021 April 2021 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Where did David hide from Saul for many years?

Select your answer to see how you score.

The wilderness Philistine camp Jerusalem Jericho