Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Mercy Not Sacrifice

Home
About
My Book
Archives
More
- Theology
- Culture
- Politics
- Sermons
- Bible
- Devotions
- Daily Office
- Podcast

Home
Progressive Christian
Hats off to the Hatmakers for taking up their cross

Hats off to the Hatmakers for taking up their cross

Last updated on: November 2, 2016 at 8:00 am by Morgan Guyton

Hats off to the Hatmakers for taking up their cross 2016-11-01T21:15:26-05:00 Morgan Guyton

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

brandonhatmaker.wordpress.com

Jen Hatmaker is a tremendously popular author among evangelical Christian women. She and her husband Brandon lead a church together in Austin. In a recent interview, Jen said that she thought same-sex marriage could be holy. And predictably she was skewered with the white-hot wrath of toxic Christians like Matt Walsh. After all the attacks on Jen, Brandon wrote a longer rationale on Facebook for their shift in views. Their humble, faithful witness amidst a barrage of attacks seems like a clear illustration of what Jesus means when he says to take up your cross. So I thought I would share an excerpt of what Brandon wrote with some of my reflections.

We’ve seen so much pain among the LGBTQ community: Suicidal teenagers. Divided families. Split churches. So. Much. Pain.

That said, Jen and I have attempted in the past several years simply to lead the church to a better posture towards the LGBTQ community. Although we held a traditional view at the time, we have always felt convicted to lead with a concern for those on the outside who might feel hopeless, more than we have with a concern for our inside critics.

Because of this, we have been consistently criticized, challenged, pressed, bullied, and pushed to make a clear stance on where we land on the topic. As the criticism grew louder, more demanding, and more confusing to those we partner with, serve with, represent, and love, we felt obligated to take a new and hard look inward to be able to explain our position with love.

In doing so, we realized that while we had heard sermons listing homosexuality as a clear sin, and we had read all the verses referenced, that we had personally neglected to do the hard work of faithfully studying the scriptures as we typically would.

The biggest complaint I have about the homosexuality debate is that because it’s a litmus test issue for evangelical identity, there simply is not the same level of honest wrestling with the anti-gay clobber passages that we bring to every other scripture. With every other scripture, we acknowledge that some scholars think it means X while others think it means Y. And we recognize that there’s often a gap between the strictly exegetical meaning and the uniquely contextual meaning that the Spirit brings into each of our personal journeys. The exegetical background helps us find our way to what the Spirit is saying, but the Spirit speaks uniquely into our lives. Only with the clobber passages is there only one possible interpretation that you must cling to with white knuckles because otherwise your fellow evangelicals will question your “orthodoxy” and vote you off the island.

Every verse in the Bible that is used to condemn a “homosexual” act is written in the context of rape, prostitution, idolatry, pederasty, military dominance, an affair, or adultery. It was always a destructive act. It was always a sin committed against a person. And each type of sexual interaction listed was an abuse of God’s gift of sex and completely against His dream for marriage to be a lifelong commitment of two individuals increasingly and completely giving themselves to one another as Christ did for the church.

But not one of these scriptures was written in the context of marriage or civil union (which simply did not exist at this time). Each act mentioned in the Bible was sin, no doubt. In context, we believe the same today. Just like heterosexual sex outside of marriage is sin for obvious reasons, whether consensual or not, we still believe homosexual sex outside of marriage is a sin.

I don’t care how many thousands of pages Robert Gagnon writes against homosexuality and whether he thinks he can prove that there were monogamous same-sex relationships in ancient Roman culture. That doesn’t change the plain meaning of the text in Romans 1, where people who exchange natural sex for “unnatural” (whatever that means) are as a result filled with envy, wrath, and dozens of other toxic fruits of sin. In Romans 1, the sin is clearly measured by its fruit. That’s the plain logical flow of the passage. If a same-sex marriage does not result in envy, wrath, and the other toxic fruits of Romans 1, then it’s not what Paul was talking about. What Paul makes clear throughout the arc of his teaching is that sin is bad because it creates toxic fruit, not because it violates taboo.

I honestly don’t think 1 Corinthians 6:9 or 1 Timothy 1:10 count as clobber passages because the correct translation of arsenokotai and malakoi simply cannot be established, no matter how conclusively Gagnon claims to have done so. If you think those words actually mean gay people, that means you’re putting gay people in the same category as slave traders, murderers, perjurers, and thieves. Not just in the sense that “we’re all sinners.” Paul has compiled lists of uniquely socially destructive sins. It makes sense to include temple prostitutes and their clientele among that list, which is a perfectly plausible meaning for those two words. Ruling out the possibility of that meaning belies an ideological agenda that makes objective interpretation impossible.

We did some heavy lifting. But we didn’t do it and I didn’t write this to try and change YOUR mind. That is the work of the Holy Spirit.

But I did write this to challenge each of you who have neglected the hard work of study, reading, discussion, and prayer to invite the Spirit to lead you. Don’t study to be right, study to find the truth. You have nothing to fear, trust that God will lead you. But wherever you land, don’t be ignorant and uninformed about it.

Being informed invites the Spirit to lead, reduces our defensiveness, and gives us the confidence to love better.

If you’ve decided you know what God’s going to say before he opens his mouth, then you cannot listen to the Holy Spirit. The Holy Spirit does not move and teach according to our ideological binaries. She simply draws us into deeper love and understanding. She demolishes our caricatures. She makes our encounter with scripture thoroughly personal. I cannot hide behind “objectivity” when the Holy Spirit is involved, because every verse calls me out and shows me how to be a more faithful disciple.

What the gay marriage debate has exposed more than anything else about the church is the way that ideology has functioned as a substitute for discipleship in toxic Christianity. Whether you agree with the Hatmakers about queer people, I hope you will accept their invitation to stop being defensive and love better.

Check out my book How Jesus Saves the World From Us!

Subscribe to our podcast Crackers and Grape Juice!

Support our campus ministry NOLA Wesley!

Previous Post

November 1, 2016

How do we make it safe to say "I'm not okay"?

Next Post

November 3, 2016 If Donald Trump wins, I will blame toxic Christianity and here's why

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Advent Beauty Will Save the World Bible Big Picture: Ephesians Bloggers Book Christian salvation and the Beautitudes Culture Daily Office Danceable Homiletics Deadly Sins Deep Roots: Genesis Devotions Dominican Republic May 2011 El Principio Misericordia (The Mercy Principle) Five verses God tattooed on my heart Fundraising FutureGospel Good Biblical Words Henri Nouwen Interview Jennings' Christian Imagination Jesus inside the beltway Jesus Is My Candidate Jesus vs the Pharisees Jesus vs. Plato Journey to Eternity Looking Back on 2012 Love Actually Monday Merton Monday Merton Music Occupy the manger On Earth As It Is In Heaven Original Sin Podcast Poetry Politics Prayer Psalm 119 Radical Jesus 101 Reviews Sermon on the Mount Sermons Spanish Bible study Special Series Spiritual but not religious Synchroblog Theology Things that made me think Thomas a Kempis Ugliness Into Beauty Uncategorized Viaje Dominicano 2013 Walking in the Valley (Lent) Welcome: It's More than a Mat Wild Goose 2013 Wrestling

Select a Month March 2022 January 2022 December 2021 September 2021 April 2021 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which prophet called bears out of the woods to attack boys who mocked him?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Elijah Elisha Isaiah Samuel